Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   Europe (https://www.fodors.com/community/europe/)
-   -   How many of you leave your kids for a week to travel? (https://www.fodors.com/community/europe/how-many-of-you-leave-your-kids-for-a-week-to-travel-99604/)

anonymous Jan 10th, 2001 10:54 AM

How many of you leave your kids for a week to travel?
 
We have always taken our kids with us on vacation and have never had a vac alone for more than 4 days during nearly 19 years. My husband does not like to leave the kids out and feels we would be selfish to go alone. However, it is very expensive to go to Europe from America during school holidays air-fare wise, isn't it? <BR> <BR>Any of you out there feel as my husband does that it is practically a sin to leave the offspring home for a romatic week alone in Europe? Presently offspring are 11 and 15, a rather awkward time for a babysitter. He believes there is plenty of time in say, 6 or 7 years, when youngest is of age. As you can tell from my tone, I'm not so convinced. But, perhaps he is right that during these parenting years we should not "abondon them".

Ed Jan 10th, 2001 11:01 AM

We've done it, once, when the kids were about that age. Some guilt feelings in doing it, but all worked out fine. Adult sitter is a necessity, at least for us. <BR> <BR>Ed

mom Jan 10th, 2001 11:04 AM

I see nothing wrong with leaving the children for a romantic trip. We have 2 kids, 10 and 2 and try to get away alone at least once a year! this may be a 4 day weekend in the Bahamas and it may be a 14 day trip to europe. I believe that children can learn alot of history and cultue in Europe, we have taken our 10 year old on two separate trips, but i have not taken my two year old. Some may disagree that traveling with a toddler is okay but IMHO its work!!! you are not really abandoning your children when you go away without them, its a chance to recharge your own batteries and they may not appreciate all the things you want to do. do people really think we are terrible because we vacation without our children , I doubt it! In our case my parents live about 6 hours away and do not get to see their grandchildren all the time, it is a treat for both for grandma to come stay with the kids for a week. i don't think however that 11 and 15 year olds would take kindly to a babysitter, but they do need some supervision. perhaps a family member staying at your house would be better or it could be classified as a housesitter rather than babysitter?

mom Jan 10th, 2001 11:04 AM

I see nothing wrong with leaving the children for a romantic trip. We have 2 kids, 10 and 2 and try to get away alone at least once a year! this may be a 4 day weekend in the Bahamas and it may be a 14 day trip to europe. I believe that children can learn alot of history and cultue in Europe, we have taken our 10 year old on two separate trips, but i have not taken my two year old. Some may disagree that traveling with a toddler is okay but IMHO its work!!! you are not really abandoning your children when you go away without them, its a chance to recharge your own batteries and they may not appreciate all the things you want to do. do people really think we are terrible because we vacation without our children , I doubt it! In our case my parents live about 6 hours away and do not get to see their grandchildren all the time, it is a treat for both for grandma to come stay with the kids for a week. i don't think however that 11 and 15 year olds would take kindly to a babysitter, but they do need some supervision. perhaps a family member staying at your house would be better or it could be classified as a housesitter rather than babysitter?

anoyomous Jan 10th, 2001 11:15 AM

Thank-you very much for the response. I hould clarify that I would NEVER leave them alone for a week at their age. For my husband, the issue is leaving them out of the vacation and with a "housesitter" or family member with whom they would be slightly uncomfortable with for a week. Our parents have both passed so there is no grandparent option. In this circumstance, how many of you would take off without them?

bobbie Jan 10th, 2001 11:24 AM

I think you can easily get away now, leaving them perhaps with a teacher from their school 'cause it will only get harder. When they become teenagers, no one will stay with them and you can't leave them alone or the whole town will be partying at your house, whether your children are the "popular" kids or not. Teenagers have a keen sense of a home without parents and descend (sorry...)So enjoy yourselves now, you won't be able to go out for many years.....

Julie Jan 10th, 2001 11:28 AM

I too would feel very guilty leaving my child behind so I take her with me everywhere. However, I must schedule Europe vacations off-season when things are cheaper. She still is free in most hotels and museums and gets a reduced rate on airfare. I think your children are beyond the age for all these cost-savings that I still benefit from. <BR> <BR>However, I am planning on going without her as soon as she is, IMHO, old enough for stay away camp. <BR> <BR>Maybe, you could find a great summer camp for your 11 year old and your 15 year-old could be a junior counselor at the same camp. You could check into camps in other states for a truly enriching experience. <BR>The 15 year-old would be free of charge, maybe even make a little money. Then it wouldn't costs much for the "childcare" , the kids wouldn't feel like they were being baby-sat, and the great experience of going to camp would make your husband not feel like the kids are being left out.

???? Jan 10th, 2001 11:34 AM

i think what this person was referrin gto was that traveling in th off season was cheaper but she couldn't because her children were school age. She either travels in the summer while they are on holiday (much more expensive) or doesn't travel because the kids can't go. <BR> <BR>Your children are old enough to understand tht you need time on your own they are not babies an there is no reason to feel guilty!. Tell the kids the next rip will be with them adn that you will be going to a lot of "boring" places while in europe, they probably woldn't enjoy it anyway. A housesitter is the answer for the kids. Try to make it less uncomfortable by leaving money for the housesitter so that the kids can do extra "fun" things while you're gone. Extra money for the arcade, moives, shopping, lots of eating out etc etc.

Parent Jan 10th, 2001 11:38 AM

I really am against leaving kids at home. I am of the feeling that children are a gift and that it is our privilage to share our lives with them for the time we have with them. It goes by much too fast -- I feel that if your kids want to go with you that you should take them. There may be a time that you are anxious to share time with them and their busy lives may not be able to accomodate you. A romantic weekend is a bit different and may be just as much fun.

anon Jan 10th, 2001 11:42 AM

<BR>Why does your husband feel he's abandoning them? I would be more concerned about how my wife felt. Isn't just as important for you to have couple time and not just be Mommy and Daddy all the time? <BR>How about one of your sisters or brothers? Or do they have a really close friend whose house they could stay at and the parents would look after your child? <BR>I'm sure to get blasted here but I don't see why kids have to go everywhere and why their parents should feel guilty about leaving them behind. <BR> <BR>Tomorrow may never come and the kids may never "be old enough" for you to travel without them. Go now while you can. Both daddy and kids will get over the abandoning. believe me!

badmom? Jan 10th, 2001 11:49 AM

Am I really a bad mother because I see no reason why children shouldn't be left at home? I certainly hope not and I don't even feel guilty doing it! I have a 4 month old son who is the light of my life and I adore him, but i'm still planning on Italy in August for 16 days without him. I also just got back from a long weekend in Vegas over New Year's without him. It just makes me appreciate him even more when I come home! There are certain places tht are jsut inappropriate for small children, 5 cities and a rental in Italy with an 11 month old is one of them. I hope people don't think I'm terrible because i went back to work when my child was 3 weeks old either! You don't have to prove to the world you love your child by spending every inute with them. You should just enjoy yur children and let them know how much you love them

Bil Cliton Jan 10th, 2001 11:52 AM

This could very easily disintegrate into a liberal vs conservative argument. Family values. Suffice it to say, I wonder how well-adjusted these kids are that are left at home while Mommy and Daddy go play. Very selfish.

Julie Jan 10th, 2001 11:53 AM

I can't speak for the author of the question but my guilt is not about leaving my child. It is about my child not experiencing something that she would enjoy. She loves Europe. Many children love going to foreign countries and visiting museums, castles and palaces. <BR> <BR>If your husband feels guilty for this reason, then if he finds something the kids will really love, he'll feel better about the whole situation. <BR> <BR>Staying at home with a sitter and getting extra money for pizza and video games may not be too thrilling for all 11 and 15 year olds. Maybe they would be happier going to camp, horse-back riding, mountain climbing, and white-water rafting. <BR> <BR>Good camps can costs around $500 a week but if one child is free (the 15 year old) it is a lot less expensive than flying both to Europe. Assuming that you are able to go in the summer.

Cindy Jan 10th, 2001 12:02 PM

Anonymous, you raise a really interesting question. My husband works long hours outside the home, so I do almost all of the child care. When he has time for a trip, he insists that the kids come along. He does not see them as often as he would like, and he feels he needs to connect with them on vacation. Personally, I could leave them for over a week and not miss them that much, but I defer to his wishes, bring the kids, and take a break by letting the kids have some time with Dad on the trip. <BR> <BR>Could this be what is bothering your husband? If you've had the time to develop a better relationship with the kids over the years, maybe he feels vacation time is his only time to catch up. If so, maybe hang on a few more years and take the kids along until you two really are on your own. <BR> <BR>Anyway, good luck.

anoyomous Jan 10th, 2001 12:24 PM

Cindy, your thoughts are close to what my situation is however, my husband is home by 6:30 every night, works some over-time, but not much and I work part-time also. But he does LOVE to be with them. However, at this point my son does not want to be seen with us, if you know what I mean. He'd love to go to Europe as he truely appreciates history and culture but would rather wait until graduation and do a summer on his own sans parental butt-ins...11 year old is museum-phobic. 15 year old goes on week long school trip to D.C. next year, but that still leaves 11 year old. My husband does not feel it is right to leave her for seven days. I am glad to know there are a few parents out there who feel the same as he does, 'cause I do see his point, but to tell you the truth, I'm not one of them!

matchmaker Jan 10th, 2001 12:43 PM

Anon, maybe you should leave all those losers at home and hook up with the guy looking for female companionship in Paris.

shocked Jan 10th, 2001 12:56 PM

I'm horrified that anyone would leave a 4-month old behind and go off on a holiday. That child is still and infant and should be breast-fed.

badmom? Jan 10th, 2001 01:07 PM

I'm sorry you are shocked that I left my 4 month old at home. Maybe I should have clarified, I did not go to Las Vegas over New years for just a "holiday", my husband's sister was getting married in Vegas on New year's eve. We went for 3 days and yes we did leave our son at home with my parents. We also plan to still take our trip to Italy in august. We have been planning this trip with another couple for 2 years and I feel our son would be more miserable and uncomfortable being stuck in a rental car for 16 days and changing hotels 5 times, children can't always adjust to these situations and he would probably be better off with my parents or my husband's parents. Please don't be so judgmental and make blanket statements like he "should be breast-fed" This is only your opinion and no I'm not breatfeeding, we are quite fine with the bottle!

annrita Jan 10th, 2001 01:09 PM

Shocked, you are too rude. Don't pay any attention, badmom, shocked is trolling. Anonymous, I think you should check out the thread, Leaving Honey at home. Just put it in the search function and it will come up. Think about it!

rand Jan 10th, 2001 01:11 PM

Well, my parents dumped me in boarding school when I was 11. I can still remember the feeling of abandonment today. But 5 years of boarding school and 10 days are hardly comparable. Anyway I did grow up into a semi-functional adult in spite of it.

honest opinion? Jan 10th, 2001 01:20 PM

When I was 12 years old, my parents left the FOUR of us with my grandparents and went on a week vacation. The youngest was 9 years old. They left with complete peace of mind because: a) they trusted we were old enough to handle the week separation, and 2) they trusted my grandparents. They had a blast and still talk about that trip. By the way, now, when they were hoping to travel to their's hearts conntent, my father is very ill and are unable to do it. Goes to tell you. <BR> <BR>I hate to get personal, but it appears you husband has an issue with intimacy and trust?

lisa Jan 10th, 2001 01:20 PM

I actually think it can send a very healthy message to kids when parents go away on vacations and leave the kids at home (with a sitter). The message is: "Our marriage and time alone together is a priority for us, and we care enough about our relationship to spend time nurturing it and not just being parents." I for one wish my parents had done this when I was growing up. Instead, the message I got was that we (the kids rather than the parents) were the center of the world and family life revolved around us. I actually think it can be harmful when kids get the message that they are the most important priority in the family rather than the marriage between the parents. Kids need to know who is in control, and if parents are always sublimating their own needs and wants in favor of those of the children, the message kids get is that what the kids want, the kids shall receive. The kids are in control, not the parents. Kids who grow up with all the attention, all the time have a rude awakening when they get out into the real world and realize that the rest of the world doesn't care so much about what they want. <BR> <BR>Nineteen years is a long time to wait for a week alone with your husband. As long as you have someone you are comfortable leaving them with, I say go for it.

good-question Jan 10th, 2001 01:30 PM

I am going to get blasted, but here it goes: American women are all "sex-up" in their single years and once they marry, they become way too much MOMMY. No wonder there is so much cheating going on. Marriage is work and couple's time should be as important as time with the kids.

tcc Jan 10th, 2001 01:36 PM

I agree wholeheartedly with what Lisa said. I really don't see this as a huge issue if your kids are teenagers. As long as they are with someone that they trust, then they probably won't see a problem with it either. My mother and I are VERY close and she went off on vacations without me when I was a child and I thought nothing of it, and I'm an only child. We were better for it. She came back relaxed (and with presents for me!) and I was able to learn how to be independent. We all need to have time to ourselves, and I can't believe it's taken you 19 years to even consider taking a vacation without your children (no blame or anything, it's just surprising to me). Go and don't feel guilty. You and your husband will be happy you did!

Ang Jan 10th, 2001 01:46 PM

I was one of those kids. I'm 24 and married now (no kids yet). <BR> <BR>I have two brothers and my parents took a one to two week trip alone once every year for my entire childhood....and we all turned out just fine! They took us on two trips a year. I know they looked forward to their trip alone. I think those trips they took alone has alot to do with them still being married. They were always soooo happy after they came back. You could just tell. It was something that brought them closer. <BR> <BR>Anyway, we always had a grandparent, cousin or close family friend stay with us until I was old enough to take care of both of my brothers. They would stay at our house so the 3 of us kids could stay on our normal routines with school, practice, etc. I don't think the 3 of us ever minded one bit when they took those trips.

Gayle Jan 10th, 2001 02:07 PM

we go on vacation without our 14 year old. we went to Europe in May 2000. she stayed with her older sister. we are going again in June 2001. We don't have to contend with the hassel of getting her out of school and she wants to go this time.

marilyn Jan 10th, 2001 02:19 PM

Our children are now 18 and 21, so we are the ones wishing they would come with us these days, but when they were younger we often took a week or 3 or 4 days here and there in addition to family trips. We have great family memories from the family trips, but also wonderful memories from the couple ones. Having a good caretaker in place is the key to peace of mind. We always had an after-school sitter who was a trusted and loved college student--my older daughter always said she was "my sister's babysitter and my companion" when queried by her friends. <BR> <BR>Nowadays we can leave them on their own, and I have to disagree with a previous poster who says you can't trust kids not to turn the house into party central. Just another example of the anti-teen and young people sentiment that seems so prevalent!

s Jan 10th, 2001 02:37 PM

I agree whole-heartedly with Lisa, Badmom? (you're not a bad mom! I think it's great!), Anon and others who condone holidays sans children. I can't believe comments like "I'm horrified that anyone would leave a 4-month old behind and go off on a holiday. That child is still and infant and should be breast-fed." How and when you leave your children for a holiday is a personal choice made by caregivers, and no one should judge! Everyone has their own preferences and needs. (Oh, and here's one for Shocked--I stopped breastfeeding at 3 months!) I personally believe parents deserve an annual holiday sans children. And guess what I am a conservative, a stay-at-home mom with strong family values!

mregenstreif Jan 10th, 2001 03:19 PM

We have 2 kids, ages 5 and 2. we've already gone on two europe trips without them. It's critical to get away ALONE with your spouse!.. You re not a bad parent if you do so--the healthier your marrige is, the better you'll be to your kids. Also, you can take 7 to 10 days in europe without them and then spend 10 to 15 days of other vacations with them (and the trips with the kids don't have to be high end in terms of $; quality time is the key). I think this holds true no matter how old your kids are.

shocked Jan 10th, 2001 03:23 PM

hey badmom, you asked if anyone thought you were a bad mother, I replied. If you don't like being judged, don't ask. But how silly of me to think you were still breast-feeding, you clearly stated that you were back at work when your child reached 3 weeks old.

anonymous Jan 10th, 2001 03:38 PM

Shocked, what's your problem? To the rest of the people who responded to my post, I really appreciate your opinions and suggestions!

Questioning Jan 10th, 2001 04:00 PM

I have a black lab and we leave her at the kennel about four weeks a year. The vet says they adjust and really don't mind. She is anxious to leave us (doesn't say goodbye) and is excited to see us. I think it works out great. I think "bad mom" is in the eyes of the beholder. I mean like, get a life. Kids are not the end of it. If you can't give enough to kids in 51 weeks, how will the additional 01.923% change their lives? Probably no where as much as a week for mom and dad to "recharge" and have a relationship. I would recommend Ayn Rand and her concept of the "virtue of selfishness" to anon's husband. Must not like being alone with her and what does that say? Just who is being abandoned? <BR> <BR>The youngest will be eighteen in seven years and since she probably feels suffocated by the *constant* presence of her parents, will probably want to escape and will likely be pregnant, thinking about whether she should go back to work three weeks after delivery. <BR> <BR>Anon's wife will have a real problem - empty nest and no caretaker around - he forgot how since it has been so long. <BR> <BR> Is Anon's wife happy giving up her life or is she thinking about going to France to meet "guy" so she can have a relationship with a "grown-up"? Probably deserves to get away without anybody....... Let him babysit if it is so damned important.

nancy Jan 10th, 2001 04:03 PM

Anon, <BR>Because your children are the age they are, I think going away by yourselves would be fine. <BR>It may be strange for them, but if you feel strongly about it, I bet they would be O.K. <BR> <BR>BUT, my sister and I were (one of those <BR>who were)left at home while very young, and my parents traveled. <BR>This was in the late 1950's and early 1960's. <BR>My parents would go away at least once a year for a 10-14 day trip (sometimes even longer) <BR>We were left with our live-in housekeeper and another woman who was hired specifically to look after us, and make sure the house ran smoothly. <BR>I hated it!! <BR>One of my strongest memories of that time period, was of waiting at the airport for my parents to arrive back home. <BR>My sister and I knew all the stewardess uniforms by sight. <BR>This had such an effect on me that my husband and I have only been away for two overnights, since our children were born, and the oldest is now 13. <BR> <BR>Not all grandparents are an option for childcare , while parents go away. <BR>I could never leave my children with my parents, As much as I love them dearly, they are just not those kind of grandparents. <BR>Just like my grandparents were not at all the babysitting kind either. <BR> <BR>Anyway, to each their own, and each parent must make their own decisions in these matters. <BR> <BR>If you go, have a very good time and don't worry about the children.

Larry Jan 10th, 2001 04:04 PM

Hey, I have a black lab also and they are a lot easier than kids!! I checked with the kennel and they said "NO, they would not take kids under any circumstances!"

m Jan 10th, 2001 06:31 PM

We are leaving in about 2 months to Paris for 5 nights of fun and marriage enrichment........we have 3 children <BR>11, 6, & 3 (in 2 months). My mom will <BR>be coming up from Houston to spend some <BR>great time with her grandchildren (she <BR>sees them at most 2-3 times a year, some <BR>years less) <BR>We feel no guilt. Our kids understand that we are there for them 24-7! They <BR>also, except the younger, understand and <BR>appreciate the fact that we are in need <BR>of a adult break......to rekindle..... <BR>This will be the 1st ALONE break since <BR>our oldest was 1 year.... <BR>You should do what you feel is best in <BR>your heart.....

s Jan 10th, 2001 07:01 PM

To m, <BR> <BR>Good for you! You deserve this getaway! Have a great time! Hope it goes well!

xxxxxx Jan 10th, 2001 07:53 PM

Here's a something that happened to my friend. Her husband would never take any trips without any of their kids. Later it was found out, that his girlfriend didn't approve of him being alone with his wife! He was always making excuses for why one of them should come with them. Not that this is happening to you, but just beaware. of the

mom Jan 11th, 2001 04:56 AM

This has been an interesting discussion. It reminds me of the day care vs. stay at home mom debate. I think it all boils down to this - some people need alone time with their spouse to strengthen their relationship - others find their relationships strong enjoying more family time -- I guess there is no right or wrong here. To each there own. Each family situation is different. <BR> <BR>For myself - I love our family vacations. My child is a wonderful addition to our trips. We leave our dog in the kennel and go. I also chose to work at home instead of placing her in day care - but that's me.

Paige Jan 11th, 2001 05:13 AM

I'm 35 but I clearly remember what it was like being a kid. My parents are divorced and my mom left us with sitters, my dad or other relatives over the years to take business trips, holidays with friends, whatever. It was no big deal. Granted, we didn't like some of the sitters but we got over it. The best scenario was when we stayed with relatives that we liked. That way, we got a little vacation, too. I think the thing is to make sure you still take trips with the kids that they like and if they really want to go where you and hubby are going, plan another trip with them later. Have you asked your kids how they feel about it?

Also Shocked Jan 11th, 2001 05:48 AM

Shocked makes a very good point, people. Mothers should NEVER leave their infants. Nope. Not at all. That mom who went to a family wedding should have taken the infant along, even if it wasn't invited. It might cry during the service, but the only thing that matters is never disrupting the strong maternal bond between mother and child. <BR> <BR>Yes, the child might catch the flu or measles or chicken pox or something else it wasn't yet vaccinated against, but that would only make the mother-child bond impenetrable. Nothing a little Tylenol wouldn't fix. And if the baby got really sick, they probably have good hospitals wherever that mom was going. <BR> <BR>And Shocked, I am glad you dismissed out of hand the notion that a mom could prepare for time away from the baby by using a breast pump. Those machines are for other people. <BR> <BR>Shocked, thanks for letting us know that there is only one decent way to parent.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 PM.