| Ed |
Apr 17th, 2000 06:02 PM |
Concorde has a significant advantage on westbound legs. You'll arrive "before" you leave. (e.g. a 7pm departure LON time will get into NYC around 5pm NYC time.) Take the morning flight and you can be in meeting in Manhattan by early mid-morning. It's a great time maker. <BR> <BR>Flying eastbound has less attraction other than the 'thrill' of supersonic flight. <BR> <BR>Take the morning flight and you do arrive in time for dinner, though your stomach won't think so. Take the afternoon flight and you'll arrive at bedtime, though your body won't think so and you may have a hard time getting to sleep. <BR> <BR>Many experienced travelers with the money (or company) to pay for the Concorde nonetheless fly FC eastbound, Concorde westbound. <BR> <BR>The seating, for what it matters on a three hour flight, is roughly equivalent to tight DC-9 coach seating. And if you're male and over 5'-9" you may find the lavs a bit challenging. <BR> <BR>But the experience is a blast. I remember my first flight, looking up at the instrument dials on the cockpit. "Hmmm," I mused, "1200 miles to go, 62,000 feet, one hour to go." Ho hum. <BR> <BR>"Wait a danged minute! 1200 miles and we'll be there in one hour?" I silently shouted. It slowly sank home ... this is a different way to travel. <BR> <BR>Rome.Switzerland.Bavaria <BR> www.twenj.com <BR>
|