Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   Australia & the Pacific (https://www.fodors.com/community/australia-and-the-pacific/)
-   -   Qantas cancels AKL-LAX service. (https://www.fodors.com/community/australia-and-the-pacific/qantas-cancels-akl-lax-service-924138/)

Gardyloo Feb 15th, 2012 07:38 PM

Qantas cancels AKL-LAX service.
 
Qantas has announced that it will discontinue its Auckland - Los Angeles nonstop service in May, basically giving Air NZ a monopoly on the route. Oy.

Passengers with existing bookings will presumably be re-routed via Oz, or else (lucky winners) accommodated on Qantas partners Air Pacific (Fiji) or Air Tahiti Nui, with en route stops in those countries.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/loca...to-LA-services

Libretto Feb 15th, 2012 07:52 PM

The new Qantas CEO is determined to further trash the brand and drive it down to the level of a pitiable budget airline. Such a shame to see a great airline (and one of the few in the world still profitable) be destroyed - and yes, I always fly - and pay - for Qantas in preference to any other airline, if possible. It had a great safety record, always very good staff on board, and the food was more bearable than most comparable airline food.

Not so sure about Air NZ, it seems to have gone downhill over the years. The last three times I flew with them (over two years ago) the service was really appalling on board, so much so that I made an official complaint, which is unusual for me. It will be "interesting" to watch developments.....

Susan7 Feb 16th, 2012 01:15 AM

It's sad what's happening to Qantas, I entirely agree with you Libretto.

I hear they are also going to abandon the Sydney-Buenos Aires route, which is one of my favourites.

Poida10 Feb 16th, 2012 07:10 AM

Well, QANTAS has to find the money from somewhere, to pay for the CEO's recently granted obscene payrise.=(
To get a QANTAS flight to most destinations, you have to go via Sydney. I know Melbourne's Mel-HKG=LHR service is finishing up soon. Will Sydney's? I doubt it.

tt7 Feb 16th, 2012 01:05 PM

Ugh ... why is it you can't mention QF without someone making inane comments about trashing the brand or the CEO's pay? As for MEL-HKG-LHR service "finishing up soon", it's only the HKG-LHR portion that is being withdrawn. Once you get to HKG, you can take CX or BA to LHR. Presumably, some people think it makes sense to have 3 members of the same alliance flying HKG-LHR, whereas QF presumably has decided it does not?

mztery Feb 18th, 2012 08:10 AM

I believe that Continental (which will by then be the new United) will start its own LAX-AKL service next year.

Gardyloo Feb 18th, 2012 08:28 AM

I'd be very surprised to see United go head-to-head with partner and fellow Star Alliance Air New Zealand on one of NZ's signature routes.

A year or so ago (pre-merger) Continental announced that one if its first 787 routes would be Houston - Auckland nonstop, but I don't know where that idea now lies within United's digestive system.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 PM.