Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Cruises
Reload this Page >

Does Size Matter?

Search

Does Size Matter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6th, 2008, 11:06 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does Size Matter?

We took a cruise from Buenos Aires to Valparaiso last year and purposefuly chose a large ship to reduce motion (and, thus, seasickness) as we were going to be in some seas famed for roughness. We are considering a cruise in September going from Whittier to Vancouver, or vice versa. How important is the size of the ship on such a cruise (i.e., how rough do the seas get)? Right now looking at a couple of different Princess ships, both over 100,000 tons, and a Holland America ship about 65,000 tons.
Fattony is offline  
Old Jul 6th, 2008, 02:14 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 37,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cruised from Whittier to Vancouver last Sept. We were on a small ship, the Pacific Princess. To give you an idea, it was under 700 passengers. You won't be really out in the open sea at all. There was one day only that I could feel the ship moving and it didn't bother me at all. There were a few people that seemed a bit queasy, but they had to be terrible sensative I think.
crefloors is offline  
Old Jul 11th, 2008, 07:45 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just got off the Holland America cruise from Boston to Montreal. The Maasdam is only 55,000 tons. I thought I was a large ship guy. I was actually afraid I was not going to like the cruise. But ... let me tell you WOW!

Holland America is a "luxury line" and that means that they offer more space per passenger than other lines. So you never feel crowded or cramped. And there is almost everything you can find on a 135,000 ton ship on this small 55,000 ton ship.

Now Holland America does it right, but other ships like some of Royal Caribbean's smaller ships, still cram tons of people on one ship and it is bad, real bad.

As for motion, really it all depends on where your going. Alaska, you going to have some movement. Caribbean, maybe if the weather is bad. In Canada, it felt like we were sailing on glass the entire trip. You would never know your moving unless you looked out the window.
Angelo721 is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2008, 09:09 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only time I have felt motion sickness was on the Grand class ships. I prefer smaller ships.
Cruiseryyc is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2008, 11:19 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really doesn't matter what size your ship is if you have rough seas you will feel movement. Have been to Alaska on Diamond Princess and Rccl(can't think of name but smaller) and both were great. Did transatlantic on VOS and 15 days were smooth as glass. Coral Princess and Serenade of Seas were awesome for Panama Canal. The only time I felt queasy was on Pride of Aloha in Hawaii, even waitress got sick. I don't believe that ship was equipped with stabilizers. So I have cruised on Carnival, RCCL, Princess,NCL and line or size makes no difference. Everyone says that lower decks are better, but DH likes higher and also middle of ship is better. You will feel rough seas if you have 12'-15' swells. You can feel without getting sick, just depends on you.
fosterag is offline  
Old Jul 17th, 2008, 08:14 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We were fortunate enough to get upgraded to the Deluxe Veranda Suite on an Alaska Cruise on HAL's Zaandam. Wow! I could tell that all the stops had been pulled out for us, and it was the first time I really felt what first class travel is all about. The room was twice the size of the standard veranda rooms, and it was great having the room to get together with friends we met onboard as well as the poeple we were traveling with.

However, I really got the feeling that everyone on board that ship had an elegant experience, no matter what room they booked.

We just got some of the extra "perks" like the lounge on our deck and the consierge in the lounge to answer questions and book table reservations and land excursions. It was like having the front desk a few steps from our room.

I'd have to say that we spent more time in our room than we would have if the room were smaller. Would it have been worth the extra $1000 per person? Maybe not, but it was fun while it lasted. I would spend the extra dollars on shore excursion, I believe, rather than book that room.
CruiserJohn is offline  
Old Jul 18th, 2008, 06:42 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't felt the difference between smaller and larger ships.All the cruise ships have good stabalizers. If you're prone to motion sickeness get a cabin that is mid ship and lower deck and you should be fine regardless of the ship size.
newyorkgolfer41 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hoocur
Cruises
5
Nov 23rd, 2015 07:26 PM
rjgdjg
Cruises
26
Feb 24th, 2015 10:47 AM
jacketwatch
Cruises
26
Sep 27th, 2007 03:25 PM
Eileen22
Cruises
6
May 23rd, 2006 03:12 AM
petlover
Cruises
8
Oct 2nd, 2004 01:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -