Search

which NYC hotel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17th, 2006, 05:27 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which NYC hotel?

Some friends are visiting next month, and after hearing me talk about my visits to NYC, they want to drive up (I live in Baltimore) and spend one night while they are visiting. And they want ME to make the hotel reservations and plan the itinerary! Perhaps I've boasted too much about my extensive New York knowledge.

I whined to my husband about how our time will be so limited, and it would be such a shame to have to stay in New Jersey (using his free Marriott points) and spend so much time commuting, so he has agreed to give us points to pay for ONE room in Manhatten, but we will have to cover the cost of the second room, which won't be so bad since we will split it four ways.

There are two Marriott Courtyards we're looking at....The Courtyard New York Manhattan/Midtown East at 866 Third Avenue, and the the Courtyard NY Manhatten/Times Square So. at 114 W. 40th Street. Which of these two hotels would be the better choice?

Thanks.
Vicki

vickib2 is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2006, 06:22 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Courtyard in Times Square South is only about 3 years old, if I recollect correctly. It should still have fairly new furnishings.
easywalker is offline  
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 05:59 AM
  #3  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your guests will be more thrilled with the Times Square location.

Also, it is Manhattan not Manhatten.

Have a great time!
 
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:04 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find the Third Avenue location to be better. I'm not a fan of the crowds around Times Square. Both hotels are well located, though, so you can't go wrong in terms of convenience.
doug_stallings is offline  
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:14 AM
  #5  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Doug, no doubt you live in New York so crowds are best avoided. Those of us who live in little towns across America go to New York so we can mingle with the big crowds. We don't want to go to a place and stay in a quiet neighborhood perhaps with treelined streets. Gee, if we wanted that, we'd stay home. We pay the big bucks to go to New York to get what we can't get at home -- noise, lights, crowds, and excitement!!!
As a tourist I'd choose the 40th Street location over the Third Avenue one.
 
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:29 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That part of Third Avenue is hardly tree-lined or residential. But I must admit that I prefer to be a little bit removed from the "action" of Times Square, one of my least favorite parts of town: expensive, mediocre restaurants, huge crowds. Good to visit, not good to stay in, in my opinion.
doug_stallings is offline  
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:42 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree the Third Ave location is better. Not because it's quiet - there are very few places in Manhattan that are quiet - but because it's more civilized.

Times Square is not just busy - it is also quite tacky - filled with cheap tee shirt shops, tons of (very expensive) chain restaurants and millions of flashing lights - most of them to very little purpose.

I understand that people from a small town would want to SEE Times Square - but to stay there - and have to deal every minute of the visit with shoulder to shoulder crowds, having to walk in the street because there's no room on the sidewalk, being pushed aside by troops of teens on group tours - simply is not very pleasant.

Third Avenue is busy enough for anyone in their right senses - with masses of people pouring out of high rise office buildings and apartment houses and the entire street lined with restaurants of all types and boutiques/shops of every variety.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:46 AM
  #8  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Personally, I'd choose the Midtown East location but first time tourists want TIMES SQUARE!!

WooHoo!! Lights!! Vendors!!! The Naked Cowboy!! People!!
 
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:47 AM
  #9  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sure, my point exactly. Most of us are "visiting" not staying.
Didn't mean to imply that Third Avenue was treelined. That was meant to suggest that as short term visitors many of us aren't necessarily looking for the same kind of neighborhood that we'd want to live in -- not that it described that area.

And if like some of us, we are seeing two shows some days and certainly one every night -- it is soooo much more convenient to be near there and travel to other neighborhoods during the day than to try to fight for a taxi to and from Broadway every night and "deal" with the crowds you have to get through even if you are arriving and leaving the area.

It's not unlike here in Florida. I live about 10 blocks from the beach. You couldn't pay me to live right on the beach. Yet I certainly understand why someone coming here for a few days would want to stay right on the beach. Same idea.

 
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:53 AM
  #10  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
By the way -- 6th Avenue and 40th Street is not exactly like standing in the middle of Broadway and 45th!!! Don't be fooled by the name "Times Square" on the hotel. In fact, it's relatively quiet -- perhaps quieter than the traffic of Third Avenue! Yet it allows you to easily walk to and from the shows without having to get a taxi and fight the traffic.
 
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 06:59 AM
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yikes! I'd better learn how to spell Manhattan!

Anyway.... Thanks for your replies. I know I've got to make a decision ASAP. The Courtyard Manhattan/Times Square South is only $229/night, with purchase at least 14 days in advance. What a price! But, for some crazy reason, it costs 15,000 more Marriott points than the Third Avenue location. (How can that be?) So, my husband says if we want a "free" room, we must stay there. A room there is $329, so splitting the cost four ways would make it around $90 each, I guess, with taxes.

But, now I'm wondering if we ought to try the Travel Inn, which has gotten such great reviews, and is only about $188/night (How can that be??) and has free parking. Don't know why I'm bring that option into this...I guess it's the free parking.

*sheesh*
It's hard to be a trip coordinator when you have ADD.

Vicki
vickib2 is offline  
Old Sep 18th, 2006, 07:06 AM
  #12  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, free parking is nothing to sneeze at since you'll be stuck with a car in the big city.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gypsyluce
United States
22
Mar 20th, 2008 05:33 PM
tifany8
United States
19
Oct 22nd, 2007 04:48 AM
Boelie
United States
53
Feb 27th, 2006 05:18 PM
soled
United States
51
Aug 11th, 2003 11:29 AM
dawn
United States
8
May 1st, 2002 03:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -