Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   United States (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/)
-   -   Where in CA? (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/where-in-ca-556130/)

wanderer Sep 3rd, 2005 10:25 AM

Where in CA?
 
My husband and I are planning way ahead for retirement (hey, I'm a financial planner - can't help it), and looking at CA (as well as WA and OR) as a possibility.

We love where we live now, but not the 60" - 100" of snow we get 4-5 months of the year not to mention the below zero temps. We have ruled out the Southeast due to the heat and humidity, and ruled out the interior as we want to stay near the coast.

We'd like to find something comparable in feel to where we live right now - we live on the coast of MA, in a beautiful historic seaport, voted one of the best 100 art towns of America.

There's always some sort of festival going on, and we like that community feel. The population is about 18K (we like this size - not too big, not too small - we would like to stay within 25K), with lots of good restaurants, a live theatre, waterfront park where free concerts are held, great boutiquey shops, good library, other nice towns surrounding, very little crime (other than petty crime), and beautiful Federalist and Victorian architecture.

Our town is on the National Register of Historic Places and our main street has more Federalist homes than any other part of the country. We live within one block of downtown and 2 blocks to the water.

Although we would love to stay where we are and escape for the winter, it is not feasible with a pet, not feasible financially.

A very average home here (3BR/2BA) sells for @550 - 600K. We live in an old home now that's been renovated (1795), but that would not be a requirement. In retirement, we might want something newer. We would, however, like a place with a sense of history (the town itself, and not a subdivision town).

We don't want to move to a place that's great in and of itself, but with nothing else around it, and want to stay withing driving distance of the coast.

We also would like to be close to town so we could walk as we do now to the center of things, and we definitely want a place with a real and vibrant "downtown". Being very close to a good hospital is also key, as my husband has had some heart problems.

We get about 40" of rain here a year, so a rainy "season" is OK with us (sure beats snow) but I think we would be crazed with constant drizzle and little sun. We really would like as close to a 4-season climate as we can get, and nothing really hot (90-100) in the summer. We'd rather have cooler than hotter.

We are recreational skiers, so being within a reasonable driving distance (4 hours) would be nice so that we could ski from time to time.

Of course we plan to visit the areas on our list, but to help in planning as we can't see it all, we'd like to know if we are in the ballpark (close to where we live now) with any of our "picks".

We have so far visited Sonoma and Napa Valleys, and our comparisons are now being made against Sonoma as we fell in love with that town. We also fell in love with St. Helena (too expensive), Yountville (probably too small and remote for retirement although oh so charming), and also loved Calistoga, but housing seemed a bit "iffy" there. We are visiting Mendocino/Ft. Bragg, Nevada City as well as Sonoma again in May. We realize Sonoma is not cheap, but we found some nice retirement communities that would suit us just fine outside of town. We'd give up being walking distance to town, but we realize there will be trade-offs whatever we decide.

Here are our picks:

Sonoma (so far our top pick)

Mendocino/Ft. Bragg (I'm thinking this might be too small and isolated for us and worry about the healthcare)

Eureka/Arcata

San Luis Obispo/Atascadero (I'm thinking this will not be the 4-season climate we are looking for and perhaps busier than we want)

Pismo Beach/Oceano/Arroyo Grande - (Same thoughts as above)

Nevada City

Any insight anyone can provide would be much appreciated.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

wanderer Sep 3rd, 2005 10:27 AM

Possibly also Paso Robles - (again, thinking we would not get the 4-season climate we seek).

wanderer Sep 3rd, 2005 10:31 AM

p.s.s. We also would like to be within reasonable driving distance of a city.

Right now we are 30 miles from Boston, and although we don't go in that much, from time to time we like to go in for the day or a long weekend to see theatre, sporting events, or just hang out. I would think a bigger city also would have specialized and more advanced health care.

rjw_lgb_ca Sep 3rd, 2005 10:39 AM

How about Laguna Beach? It's quite expensive, but it's a gorgeous arts-community town with lots of history, lots of world-famous festivals (Festival of the Arts, Sawdust Festival, Pageant of the Masters), regular Art Walks in downtown galleries, beach, near towns, four hours to skiing, etc.

iamq Sep 3rd, 2005 01:07 PM

You might look into Healdsburg, just north of Santa Rosa. Cute town, great location, probably pretty expensive though. I would also consider the Monterey area. Good luck.

-Bill

Underhill Sep 3rd, 2005 01:46 PM

Try the small town of Mendocino, on the northern California coast.

wanderer Sep 3rd, 2005 01:51 PM

We visited Healdsburg our first visit to CA. Although very special, we found it a bit remote.

I think Laguna Beach is perhaps out of our price range, and does not offer the 4-season climate we are seeking.

We are looking forward to our visit to Mendocino, and look for any info. on the healthcare system there - hospitals, specialists, distance to urgent care/advance care facilities....

mikemo Sep 3rd, 2005 01:59 PM

If you find a place that meets most of or all of your requirements, please do let us know.
M

fehgeddaboudit Sep 3rd, 2005 05:07 PM

Buy now.
Rent it out.
Remodel when you retire and move in.

That's what I'm doing.

crefloors Sep 3rd, 2005 06:35 PM

What about Sebastapole? Fort Bragg can be pretty foggy and damp, Nevada City is a really neat little town, between Sacrament and Reno. It is usually below the snow line so you can get out and go to SAC anytime you want. If there is a lot of snow in the Sierra, it makes Reno hard to get to sometimes. It is also fairly convenient to Lake Tahoe and San Francisco although I think a better weekend trip...too far for a good day trip, but you COULD do either SF or Tahoe as a day trip if you really wanted to. Not my idea of a good time. You can get a fair amount of fog settling in and around Nevada City in the winter time. The town is charming, I love it there. I hope you find the city of your dreams. Good luck.

razzledazzle Sep 3rd, 2005 07:13 PM

Yup, I was thinking Sebastopol, you passed on Petaluma...??? Yeah housing costs are nutz here...yet Petaluma has the history you seek.
Ah, schucks...to be close by
or look at Cotati, Rohnert Park, Windsor
and Cloverdale.
All have loads of festivals, farmer markets, etc.
Gosh I have a Luxury Link deal I would
love to "pass on" for the Stevenswood
Lodge in Mendo if you are tempted it's a great deal at a great place..
R5

tovarich Sep 4th, 2005 03:47 AM

The towns we found interesting during our tours in the States where we would like to live were:
- Santa Barbara, Ca
- Santa Fe and Taos, N. Mexico
- Springdale,; Utah
Paul

wanderer Sep 4th, 2005 05:57 AM

On our recent trips to CA, we checked out:

Petaluma, Sebastapol, Bodega, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Windsor, Cloverdale, Healdsburg, Sonoma, Glen Ellen, Kenwood, Napa, Yountville, Calistoga, St. Helena.

We really liked Petaluma, but it is too big for us.

Sonoma is at the top of our list. St. Helena is on the list also, but only if we win the lottery.

We cannot afford Santa Barbara, and it doesn't have the 4-season climate we are looking for. We also want to stay on the coast, so NM and Utah, although beautiful states, would not fit our criteria. We're pretty set on our list, unless anyone knows of a town we missed that fits what we are looking for. The only one I have read about that we did not include because I think it is too far inland and may be too hot in Summer is Chico. Our criteria in a nutshell:

Driving distance (hour or so) to ocean

Driving distance to skiing (4 hrs or less)

A "real" downtown

A vibrant town with arts and culture

A town between 8K - 25K population

Good restaurants

A sense of history

Nice neighboring towns

Good weather - not constant rain/drizzle nor lots of snow (we don't mind a little snow if it melts quickly)- we want to see the sun (not too hot in summer though)

A town with "real" stores mixed in with the "boutique" stores

Close (hour or so drive) to a major city

Town with a hospital IN the town

Recreational opportunities - farmers markets, festivals, etc.

Can anyone comment on Eureka and Aracata?

wanderer Sep 4th, 2005 06:17 AM

We are also staying in Sutter Creek (also on our list) when we come out in May.

Can anyone fill me in on this town/area?

GP Sep 4th, 2005 06:41 AM

Hi Wanderer

I can comment on Eureka/Arcata. I do not think we meet your needs We meet or exceed #'s 1,4 5,6,7,8,9,12(Both). and 13 Some would say yes to 3 and 10. However it is not for everybody. Up here behind the ever shrinking redwood curtain there is not a lot to do. More so when you compare us with the southern part of northern California. I think this area is the best place to live in all of California, but I am biased. There has been a land boom up here and we are seeing a number of retirees moving in. If you have additional questions post back to this thread I am always lurking around. Good luck in your search.

Have Fun
GP

Song Sep 4th, 2005 09:11 AM

Check out Rancho Bernado, Northeast suburban of San Diego. RB is 25 min. from downtown San Diego, 20 min. from the beach, 45 min. from the desert and 30 min. away from the mountain (If you like snow). Big Bear, 2-3 hrs from here, is a popular ski resorts area for S. Californians. RB is a well planned retirement community town. The weather here is just impeccable. Most of the days are blue sky with warm sunshine. In the evenings, you can enjoy the cool sea breeze.

Five years ago, we sold our high-tech business in Ohio and retired here. We have been throughly enjoy our life here.

nancytwo Sep 4th, 2005 04:09 PM

Comments regarding Sutter Creek, Nevada City etc. These little towns really are lacking in health care you would have to go to Sacramento for any major type illness.

San Luis Obispo has beautiful weather, my daughter went to college there and she wore shorts all year long. She hated to leave the clean air and sunshine when she graduated. Santa Maria is growing and there is a nice over 55 community being built there.

Sonoma is a favorite of mine too, it is getting a little expensive. There are older homes close to the town square need a little TLC that are more affordable.

We settled in Aptos/Seascape area on the Monterey Bay - we look directly across the bay at Monterey and Pacific Grove. We love the weather and walking on the beach. Good luck in your search - as a native Californian who has lived all over I would not go to Mendocino you would find that to remote. It makes a great place for a visit!

LoveItaly Sep 4th, 2005 04:12 PM

I agree with NancyTwo having had family members live in the vicinity of Nevada City etc. If there are health problems that is not the best place to be, as beautifiul as the area is.

dwooddon Sep 4th, 2005 04:51 PM

Can I go outside the box of your question a little bit? Why are you restricting yourself to California?

It seems to me the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe fits much of what you asked for. Most years, the snow is not excessive, you are only a short drive from the Sacramento area and a slightly longer drive to San Francisco, and the tax situation is much more favorable in Nevada than California. If you don't like Tahoe, you might want to look at the Verdi area just west of Reno or the Carson Valley just east of Tahoe and a few thousand feet lower in elevation.

Just a thought.

wanderer Sep 4th, 2005 04:56 PM

Thanks. That's just the info. I'm after - what I won't find out in the tour books, or seeing a place.

Knowing how "liveable" someplace is for us is reallt important.

In my heart, I think we will end up in Sonoma. We just have not found anyplace that we like better - other than where we live.

It feels "comfortable" to us - a mix of "cutsey" shops with stores like paint stores, drugstores, etc.

And who could argue that the surrounding towns are a vacation in themselves. Sonoma seems to meet most of what we are looking for, if not all.

At this point, I'd love to know cons of living there - I'm sure there are some - other than price of homes, of which we are all too well aware...

We are not in a position to buy now - we cannot afford 2 homes - so we can just hope that where we are keeps pace... So far, so good.

Would love to hear from anyone who lives here what the negatives are. We're well aware that no place is perfect.

nancytwo Sep 5th, 2005 07:41 PM

The only negatives that I know of are it can get very hot there. We went to the annual Art and Wine festival held in July several times and it was 103!
Lots of tourists on the weekends but you can work around that. My son in law is from St. Helena and they travel all the back roads to get around.

We have former neighbors who moved to Healdsburg and love it.

Jean Sep 5th, 2005 08:13 PM

Being a financial planner, you've researched real estate costs in California vs. Oregon vs. Washington, I assume.

I'm California-born and love my beautiful state, but frankly I don't know how people can afford to move here. You mention homes in your current neighborhood sell for 600K, but that isn't going to buy you much anywhere near the ocean in California. (I live in a beach town in L.A. County where an architecturally interesting but not historic 3bed/2bath house would cost you $2+ million. Heck, you can buy mine for $1.25 million without the interesting architecture, but then where would I go?)

And have you researched property taxes? For property purchased for 600K, the first property tax bill would be close to $7,000 (depending on local add-ons) and increases every year thereafter.

Anyway, good luck with your research. My sister-in-law's research caused her to sell her house in the S.F. Bay area and move to Portland. I would've picked Santa Fe.

andiamo Sep 5th, 2005 09:19 PM

Good luck on your quest. I live in SF, and absolutely love Sonoma. From your description of what you are looking for, it sounds perfect. Also, not sure how much time you spent there, but you will find the people are incredibly friendly and welcoming. (Must be all the wine! :)

Just wanted to note, although someone mentioned that it can get quite hot there in the summer, it does not get really humid, it's a dry heat.

The location is fantastic, you are within driving distance (less than an hour) to the ocean, about an hour from San Francisco, you are also in driving distance from Lake Tahoe (scenic, relaxing, and skiing if you're into that), plus, Yosemite is several hours away for a getaway.

Sonoma also has some wonderful spas and hot springs for both body and mind relaxation.

You asked for negatives. Except for a bit of touristy traffic (mostly in the summer/fall on weekends), I honestly can't think of a single thing. It's a beautiful area, close to so many things, warm, wonderful people, great food and wine, gorgeous scenery (it always reminds me of Europe when I travel the back winding roads through the vineyards), and perfect weather.

Best of luck to you and your husband. Hope you find exactly what you are looking for, and that you will be eternally happy in your choice.

Andiamo

acwsf Sep 6th, 2005 11:34 AM

One thing to consider about living in Sonoma, which is by no means a deal-breaker, but is distance to the nearest airport (would love to hear what residents have to add to this). I have colleagues that live in Petaluma and was shocked to hear that it takes them 1.5 hours to get to SFO without traffic. If they are going around rush hour, they allow 3 hours! I was shocked. That to me, is a disadvantage.

Santa Rosa has an airport, but I'm not sure of the types of flights out of there (my assumption is that there are a lot of inter-California flights). If you are going to be going to Boston to visit family you will most likely have to fly out of SFO or Oakland.

My parents have a house in Geyserville, so I'm familiar with the drive to and from SF. I have never done the drive to either the Oakland Airport or SFO, so I don't really know the actual driving time. It's just something to know about, but again, it's not a deal breaker. The area is really lovely and wonderful. Good Luck!

gualalalisa Sep 6th, 2005 12:04 PM

Sadly for us, commercial flights no longer fly out of Santa Rosa - it's now private planes only.

I think Mendocino would be too remote for you - the nearest hospital is in Fort Bragg 10 miles to the north and it's not really a critical care facility.

May I suggest beautiful Ojai? Located about 15 miles inland from Ventura (south of Santa Barbara) it has the art/historical/community vibe you are seeking. To me, it combines small town ambience with convenience to two big cities - Santa Barbara and L.A. I would definitely choose Ojai over Sonoma!

wanderer Sep 6th, 2005 04:32 PM

Ojai is spectacular, I have been there twice. But coming from New England, we really are seeking a "4-season" climate, and I think the area north of SFO suits us a little better in that regard.

The airport drive time does not bother me that much. We know from our visits about the traffic and drive times, and when retired, would be able to plan/adjust much easier.

Our main concern is quality of life - again, the things the tour books can never really quantify - to us that means a vibrant community, friendly people, lots going on, good health care and a nearby hospital, a good library, good weather so that we can enjoy the outdoors, low crime, not being in an "oasis" with nothing else around you, not having to drive out of town to attend to ongoing needs - ie., hardware store, grocery store, etc. (where do people in this area shop for clothes, however??).

I am cognizant of the high cost of living - same as where I am from. We could not afford Sonoma except for a very modest house or one in a retirement community outside of town (a trade-off, but we gain other benefits).

I am a firm believer that you get what you pay for. We live in a great community now, and we pay for doing so. I think Sonoma would be no different. We are certainly checking other areas - WA, OR - but so far nothing has measured up to Sonoma.

Tourist traffic is a given in our area too, so I think we can deal with that. When I first moved to my town, I used to walk downtown and think "why are all these people walking around with cameras?". Then I realized I live in a pretty special place, and these people were all tourists!! I guess you take what you have for granted sometimes.

Hope to hear from more of you on the pros/cons of Sonoma.

For what it's worth, area we are thinking of living is Temelec/Chantarelle/Creekside retirement communities outside of town. If anyone has info. - good or bad - please fill us in.




LoveItaly Sep 6th, 2005 05:08 PM

Hi wanderer, regarding SFO airport there is a commercial bus that goes between SFO and Sonoma. Think it is called the Sonoma Airporter. With the cost of parking at SFO that might be a way to get to and from SFO.

One note, friends lived in Sonoma but eventually moved as they were not happy with the medical care there. But don't know the details but something you would no doubt want to look into.

I have family in Ojai and it is beautiful but to tell you the truth it is more fun to visit there then live there. And Hwy 33 which gets you to Frwy 101 often gets landslides in winter which can really cause a problem.

Sonoma use to have a beautiful shoe store and dress store but the shoe store closed down and I believe the dress store did also. You will no doubt have to go to one of the malls for shopping.

What fun, looking for a new place to live! Enjoy and best wishes to you with your decision.

wanderer Sep 6th, 2005 06:07 PM

LoveItaly -
Would be curious where your friends moved from Sonoma. Health care is an important consideration for us.

LoveItaly Sep 7th, 2005 02:24 AM

Hi wanderer, they moved to a small town outside of Phoenix. Not a choice I would have made. But they are happy there so that is all that is important. They love their house, the desert scenery, their pool etc. and they say that the health care is wonderful. They now have Medicare along with HealthNet which cost something like $80.00 pp monthly for Health Net.

I don't know what age you are at or at least will be when you move. And of course we all know medical plans change year by year. But let me just say that I would sure check into what coverage would be available over and above Medicare. Where I lived until 5 years ago really has nothing to offer except for Kaiser. Where I live now there is a plan that is $95.00 per month with a wonderful medical group and hospital. But again as you know medical insurance plans change and so nothing is written in stone.

wanderer, I am not sure if Sonoma is where you want to be from what I have read. I consider Sonoma an "oasis". You have to leave town for any serious shopping, Santa Rosa or Novato have the malls. I do not even think that Sonoma has a hospital but I am be incorrect on that. I know my friends were always going to Santa Rosa for their stockbroker, health care, shopping, movies etc. or Novato for shopping. They lived in Sonoma but it seemed they were always going out of town for the services and stores that they needed. Sonoma is a beautiful little town but it is not where I would chose to live quite frankly. Don't mean to be negative just sharing my thoughts. Best wishes.

wanderer Sep 7th, 2005 04:07 AM

Thanks. Where we live now does have a hospital, a very small little movie "theatre" (actually a storefront that someone converted that until a few years ago just had folding chairs - very charming), and no heavy duty shopping save a Marshalls and KMart on the fringe of town. So we are used to driving for the mall, bigtime movies, etc.

What I meant by being an "oasis" was a beautiful little town with no other surrounding towns with much to offer, and not even near a big city.

I don't see Sonoma quite that way - it is close to the ocean, skiing, shopping and every town that borders it also is beautiful and offers something. If we wanted to travel further to "vacation" we could easily get to Mendocino, Central Coast, Southern Oregon border, etc. If Sonoma was just smack in the middle of nowhere, we wouldn't consider it. I think much of the draw is the surrounding country, and of course the weather.

All of these comments are really helpful for us to sort this out. We can visit and love a place, and of course we would visit many times and rent before we bought, but it is a big move....

wanderer Sep 13th, 2005 02:42 PM

What can anyone tell me about Chico?

cabovacation Sep 13th, 2005 02:53 PM

Chico is probably too much of a State College town for you, as is Davis. Don't overlook two weather conditions in parts of California: fog and heat. Sonoma and Napa get pretty hot.

Maybe rethink Healdsburg. It is not as remote as several of the other towns you are considering.

Pacific Grove is pretty terrific, too, and not that far from San Jose.

The towns close to amenities are often the most expensive, too.

How about Lincoln Hills? Is that area appealing? Very structured, and not my style, but many, many people I know absolutely love it there.

We will all eagerly await your decision.

GrandmaCarol Sep 13th, 2005 06:08 PM

We live in Pleasant Hill / Walnut Creek. It's 30 miles east of SF and have:
Driving distance (hour or so) to ocean

Driving distance to skiing (4 hrs or less)

A "real" downtown

A vibrant town with arts and culture

A town between 8K - 25K population

Good restaurants

A sense of history

Nice neighboring towns

Good weather - no snow

A town with "real" stores mixed in with the "boutique" stores

Close (hour or so drive) to San Francisco

Town with a hospital IN the town

Recreational opportunities - farmers markets, festivals, etc.

iamq Sep 13th, 2005 07:02 PM

I went to school at CSU Chico and lived there for about 6 years. Given your requirements I would say that it would be too hot in the summer for you. Most summer days are in the mid 90s to low 100s. You do get four seasons and a relatively mild winter though. It is a typical college town. The surrounding area is mainly agricultural. It has a cute downtown area with a central square where there are concerts and festivals in the summer.It is a 3 to 4 hour drive to the Bay Area and about a 2 hour drive to Sacratomato. I loved living there and go back every year to visit friends who never left.

-Bill

wanderer Sep 14th, 2005 03:18 AM

We are rethinking Healdsburg, and will visit there again in May when we are out.

How hot does Sonoma get?? Weather.com chart shows up to 90 in July but not above. We get that here, and some waves into the 100s once in awhile - in fact it was 88 degrees Mon night at 8pm. Here's it's the hot "sticky" humid heat though. As long as it isn't 90 - 100 for months on end, I think we could stand it. Sure beats snow.

One thing I should mention, as I've been to Pacific Grove and loved it, and have a friend who lives in Walnut Creek, is that as nice as those two communties are, price IS an issue.

In Sonoma we can find a nice 3br/2ba home in a retirement community (not a mobile home park) for between 500K-600K. I couldn't find anything that price in Pacific Grove, so crossed it off the list.

Cabovacation - where is Lincoln Hills? I know Eureka/Aracata is remote, and we've crossed off our list due to amount of rain and remoteness. We're thinking SLO may not fit either, but still want to see it. It's far from a major city, and doesn't have the change in seasons we hope to find.

GP Sep 14th, 2005 06:47 AM

Hi Wanderer

Thanks for crossing "Eureka/Aracata" off your list. It is very backwater, it rains all the time and the locals are standoffish. You will be much better off somewhere else.

Have Fun
GP

Brasil_Nut Sep 18th, 2005 07:46 AM

My wife wandered into your post after wandering out of bed early this morning
so I'm using her identity. Our first reaction is why in the heck are you moving from what you have? Wanna trade houses?? No, actually we can see the downside of the weather!!

Have you checked into Lake County? I'm a Broker here(30 years) and while Lake Co. may be a little short of all your requirements, it does have a lot to offer. We're just over Mt St Helena from Calistoga; have just had a surge in land planted in wine grapes; total county population of 65,000+; a little over 2 hours to San Francisco or Ft Bragg/Mendocino; 3-3 1/2 hours to Tahoe/Reno and about 2 hours to Sacramento International(all times dependent upon where you actually live in the county--the middle of the county is Clear Lake, the largest natural lake totally within California so you have to go around it). We get our 100-degree days for a week or so at a time but it has been in the 80's all this month. There are a couple of communities in the county that might fit--Lakeport, the county seat, has a nice older downtown; Kelseyville is not a city but has a small downtown area of older buildings and Middletown is the first community after going over St Helena from the Napa Valley and has a cute area of older buildings a couple of blocks long. Is golf an interest? There's a gated community outside of Middletown with a good 18 hole course(Hidden Valley Lake), but it is 2-5 degrees warmer in summer and colder in winter. In fact the hot air balloons that can't go up in the Napa Valley due to fog come to this area during the foggy Napa mornings. We do the major shopping in Santa Rosa.

Lake County has the cleanest air in California and we've seen a surge in property values because our homes are still less expensive than surrounding markets. Clear Lake is probably the oldest lake on the North American continent with evidence of man going back 12,000 years. We are a large retirement area, but we've had many retirees move because of distance restrictions for Kaiser, which is in Santa Rosa - two hospitals here which are smaller. Redbud in the south end is affiliated with Adventist Health and heart procedures are done at St Helena Hospital, also Adventist Health. We have a couple of doctors well known in heart procedures. Lakeport has Sutter Lakeside, associated with Sutter Health. Critical care does send you out of the county though.

Cobb Mountain area does get some snow and is the largest geothermal energy producing area in the world(or was)!

Guess I really rambled!! Regarding Sonoma, sounds like it is hard to beat on your list and based on our few trips there it is understandable. You might check out the Lincoln area because of the new senior community there. At least spend a day driving through Lake County as every place you mention surrounds us!! Highway 20 travels the north shore of Clear Lake as you go from Interstate 5 to Hwy 101 and/or Ft Bragg. Hwy 29 comes up from the Napa Valley through Middletown and up to Lakeport where it ends at Hwy 20. Here's my website if you'd like a little real estate info. http://www.prurealty.com/david.hughes Also try lakecounty.com if you're interested in more research.

Best of luck in your quest. Post if we can tell you more!!

Brasil_Nut and Brasil_Nut II

jtrandolph Sep 18th, 2005 02:03 PM

I grew up in Sonoma. We are retired now and I would go back in a minute except that my husband still has ties to the University where he taught for 30 years.

As for hot summers, yes there can be hot days in Sonoma, but they rarely last for more than two days and then the marine layer comes in from the coast in the mornings and cools things off. However, even on a hot day, it cools off at night and summer evenings can be very pleasant.

Distance from airport. There is an airporter which goes from Petaluma to SFO and is very efficient. The drive to the airport is not too bad, except when there is heavy traffic.

The medical care is good, and it is only 20 miles to Santa Rosa if more specialized medicine would be needed.

The summer tourists are legion, but if that doesn't bother you it should not be a concern.

I would not like to be as far north as Mendocino, since we like to have season tickets to the American Conservatory Theatre in San Francisco and I find it quite isolated.

We live in Santa Cruz. I am not suggesting it because of housing prices, but it does have a University campus and the ocean.

Good luck with your planning.

wanderer Sep 18th, 2005 05:03 PM

Thanks everyone. I think we have ruled out Mendocino due to remoteness, and medical care. Same for San Luis Obispo/Atascadero and Pismo Beach and also due to 2-season rather than 4-season climate. All we are looking forward to see, however.

We still keep going back to Sonoma, as having most of what we want. Nevada City seems cute, but again, quality medical care with specialists seems to be an issue.

We look forward to our trip in May to see more of Sonoma and some of the real estate there. We also will take a second look at Healdsburg on our way down from Mendocino, although we found it a bit "remote" (meaning farther from the things we want to be close to than we really want to be) on our last visit. We are just hoping MA can keep pace with the prices in CA....

LoveItaly Sep 18th, 2005 05:15 PM

Nevada City is a darling place and a wonderful area to visit but the health care is not top notch. I know as I have had family members that have lived in that area. Great for a summer location home etc. but personally I would never live there 365 days a year. Sonoma is much closer to services that you will want or sometime in the future might need. Again wanderer, best wishes to you with your decision.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:37 AM.