Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   United States (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/)
-   -   SF Hotel - 4Seasons vs W vs ? (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/sf-hotel-4seasons-vs-w-vs-707686/)

golfin May 24th, 2007 08:16 AM

SF Hotel - 4Seasons vs W vs ?
 
You guys were incredibly helpful in my "hip" hotel thread. So, its down to concrete decision time. Weekend in July. Shopping, eating, drinking, sleeping, walking. Mid-40's, love luxury, hate Ritz-style stuffiness, enjoyed the Standard in LA, found the Gansevoort in NY way too pretentiously hip (or maybe we're just old). Money not an issue but value/bang for buck matters. Choices include:

4Seasons - premier - $400
W - "fabulous" (just below suite) $300
Vitale - pano suite - $650
Vitale - dlx waterfront- $330
Palomar - lux king - $330

What do you guys think?

SAB May 24th, 2007 08:53 AM

My 2 cents: In terms of location I would say the Vitale on the Embarcadero. I admit I'm prejudiced in favor of the Embarcadero, I think the City has done a good job of updating the area without turning it into tourist central. In other words, we locals like it and hang out there. The Palomar and W are both right by the convention center, not a bad location but not as interesting as the Embarcadero and definately lots of business travelers. The 4 seasons is on Market Street, which is busy during the day, but somewhat dead at night. Great hotel, but not my idea of a great SF location.

Shanghainese May 24th, 2007 09:02 AM

2nd SAB for the Vitale, get a water-facing room on the upper floors, the location is the best in SF, the hotel is not LA hip but lots of charming guests younger than mid-40s. Don't get the suite if value for the buck matters.

TTess May 24th, 2007 09:38 AM

Reading what YOU prefer, I would go with the Vitale, too.

You might also check out The Hotel Monaco.

ruckus Jun 10th, 2007 06:27 PM

I just stayed at Vitale.... it was absolutely wonderful. Great walking, restaurants, and hotel.... not much for night life although the restaurant/lounge in the hotel was quite lively daily for a couple hours everyday after work.

ruckus Jun 10th, 2007 06:30 PM

Sorry, forgot about "shopping and sleeping". Upscale eats and shopping across the street at the ferry building and 1 block away at embarcadero center. 15 min. walk to Union square for all the high end stores. Stayed for over a week at Vitale and slept great every night.

SFImporter Jun 13th, 2007 07:59 PM

Yay! I'm glad I'm not alone for my enthusiasm for The Embarcadero area. It's so close to easy transportation to get anywhere and the view of the Bay Bridge is really nice.

I have always thought that Union Square is to downtown-ish and we all know what lurks at Fisherman's Wharf.

I like the fact that The Embarcadero is away from the hustle and bustle - but close enough so you can get to the hustle and bustle if you so choose.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:23 PM.