| Gardyloo |
Mar 6th, 2003 10:06 AM |
I think it's hard to compare these places objectively. Banff and Jasper are the crown jewels in the Canadian National Park system, and they are very highly developed - luxury hotels, paved or improved hiking trails, mountain gondolas, big parking lots near the attractions, tons of restaurants, shops, and cars in Banff and Jasper towns. Also zillions of tourists - the area around Chateau Lake Louise (which is drop-dead gorgeous, BTW) feels like Disneyland on some days. Remember Banff and Jasper are accessible by train, and Calgary is just a short hop in the car from Lake Louise, so lots of weekenders have ready access. The flip side of this development is that there's plenty of variety in accommodations and activities, and the $CDN is fairly week at the moment.<BR><BR>The Kenai Peninsula is another matter. The level of development in Seward or Homer is very scant compared to Banff/Jasper. The distances are great, and because the main part of the peninsula is not in protected status, the level of development and visual "neatness" is nowhere near that of the more manicured Canadian parks. However, the wilderness is pretty close in Alaska, and with minimal effort you can get yourself well and truly away from humans (but remain close to several billion mosquitoes in June.)<BR><BR>The big difference is that the Kenai is a marine environment and Banff/Jasper is continental. You will see elk in Banff, but you will absolutely not see orcas. Both areas have grand mountains (the Rockies more dramatic) and glaciers (better in Alaska). You can take a boat or a plane across Kachemak Bay, or a day trip into the Kenai Fjords National Park and see serious wildlife and wilderness. In Jasper you can take a gondola to it, or sit in a thermal bath with mountain sheep grazing in the parking lot.<BR><BR>Does this help or merely add confusion?
|