Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

New Fung Wah Bus Info

Search

New Fung Wah Bus Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 07:36 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Fung Wah Bus Info

It has been decided that the Fung Wah bus line that runs between NYC and Boston and Washington will be allowed to continue to operate - but under new scrutiny/regulations.

The buses will be mechanically inspected on a regular basis and all of the drivers have to be requalified - that is - prove that they have a valid bus driver's license - and that they can both speak and read basic english.

nytraveler is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 07:40 AM
  #2  
Suerich68
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I suppose they will have to charge more than the $15 (is it?) now to go from NY to Boston or DC.

Did no one ever equate a ridiculously cheap fare with their skimping on the very important details, such as bus maintenance, qualified drivers, etc.?
 
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 07:52 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the Orthodox Jewish buses battling each other in court over this route, it seems like for reliability and safety, one should consider taking the national companies like Peter Pan or Greyhound, even if it costs more.
MikeT is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 08:07 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What evidence do you have that Greyhound is better or safer? Greyhound had an accident in New York on August 28 that killed 5 people. Has a Fung Wah bus ever had a fatal accident?
Anonymous is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 08:09 AM
  #5  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is there a problem with Fung Wah?
 
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 08:37 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Earlier this week, one of the FW buses on a NYC-Boston route took an exit ramp too fast and rolled on its side.
Anonymous is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 08:39 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greyhound is at least satisfying the DOT standards regarding safety and training; no such guarantees with Fung Wah and the other Chinatown bus companies. That's why there is so much controversy.

MikeT is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 09:47 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since the bus line that does a better job of meeting DOT standards has the worse fatality record, perhaps those standards are flawed. Furthermore, after an accident last spring, the DOT asid they would be monitorind FW's training etc. more closely.
Anonymous is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 09:54 AM
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's certainly possible for any company to have a bad driver - or any driver to have an accident.

To say that a company that has routes all over the contry and has been in business for dozens of years has more fatalities than a start up local business is simply apples and oranges.

Fung Wah had had several other incidents in addition to the recent rollover (whihc had serious injuries) in a short period of time - and it hs been found that at lest some of the drivers are not qualified - and neither speak nor read basic english (so how did they get a bus drivers lic?)

It seems to me that the DOT should be watching all of them. But it is worthwhile to note that this one seems to be having more problems.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 09:58 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a way, yes, it is apples and oranges.

But the accident was recent, and local. Thus, that driver's quaifications and errors are relevant since he was drawn from the same Greyhound staff who drive the same route as the FW buses. I have no idea what Greyhound's long-term or nationwide record might be, but I agree that it is irrelevant here.
Anonymous is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2006, 10:09 AM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except that Greyhound does 10 times the number of trips per day on that specific route and has a much longer history. So therefore one wreck with fatalities doesn't mean it is less safe, given the large number of trips you drive.

It's like saying a 16 year old is a safer driver than a 40 year old because during the 24 years of driving, the 40 year old had one accident.
MikeT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nytraveler
United States
6
Sep 7th, 2006 09:12 AM
nerfbert
United States
4
Jun 1st, 2005 08:53 AM
unejam1
United States
6
Mar 9th, 2004 07:20 AM
SallyKate
United States
15
Feb 13th, 2003 02:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -