Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   United States (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/)
-   -   Napa Valley (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/napa-valley-1087352/)

gaila Feb 21st, 2016 04:43 PM

Napa Valley
 
How many days do you suggest to spend in the Napa Valley area? If we can only spend 2 days is this enough to see something? I can rearrange things if I need to. Thanks!

janisj Feb 21st, 2016 04:55 PM

>> If we can only spend 2 days is this enough to see something?<<

What sorts of things do you want to 'see'? It is mostly about the vineyards and wineries and dining - and that can be done as a day trip, or a couple of days or however long you have.

MmePerdu Feb 21st, 2016 05:42 PM

There are some charming towns in the Napa Valley, but with such a short visit I'd choose nearby Sonoma, similar attractions but a smaller area to cover and a very nice intimate town with history, as well as wine.

MichelleY Feb 21st, 2016 05:45 PM

Two days is fine for Napa.

MmePerdu Feb 21st, 2016 05:58 PM

My last Sonoma experience, looking forward to more in a couple of weeks:

http://www.travelgumbo.com/blog/road...ay-in-sonoma-1

gaila Feb 22nd, 2016 04:48 PM

Thank you all ... Nice photos !

NewbE Feb 22nd, 2016 07:44 PM

Does your two days mean two nights? Because there are so many terrific dining options, I would want two dinners, myself. But the short answer is, sure, two days is fine. Enjoy!

JulieEC Feb 23rd, 2016 01:17 PM

I second the recommendation of Sonoma. We just spent a month in that area and preferred the intimacy of Sonoma.

Beyond wineries and restaurants, we enjoyed visiting Jack London's home which is now a state park. And there are some nice restaurant choices nearby in Glen Ellen.

gaila Feb 27th, 2016 02:22 AM

Thank you! Now can you recommend some of the wonderful restaurants?

JulieEC Feb 27th, 2016 02:35 AM

Have you narrowed down your itinerary? We found no end to good food.

gaila Feb 27th, 2016 02:46 AM

Hmmm... maybe Napa Valley and Sonoma . Sounds like that's what most recommend.

JulieEC Feb 27th, 2016 04:12 AM

We enjoyed the Rutherford Grill. It's in Napa actually, up near St. Helena (which is a very pretty town). Near there, we tasted olive oil in addition to wine. I'm not sure how common this is, but at the Rutherford Grill, you can bring in your own bottle of wine. It's a bit of California meets comfort food. I had a wonderful kale salad and my husband loved his roasted chicken. Then they do this corn bread that is ridiculous.

Glen Elen is a very nice small town for restaurants. We ate at the Glen Ellen Inn and had a very good meal in a lovely setting. Friends have said they like a place in town more (but I forget which one...I think their choice was highly rated on TripAdvisor).

The town of Petaluma is nice. It was the backdrop of some number of movies. A bit more old west. A bit larger. We ate at Central Market twice--farm to table sort of restaurant.

I might recommend heading up thru Napa. Spend the night near St. Helena/Glen Ellen (and if you want to walk, stop at the Jack London State Park). Then head back through Geyserville (small town but a few very nice restaurants) , Healdsburg (a bit bigger and very charming town with some nice small vineyards outside), Petaluma, and Sonoma town (which is perhaps the most charming of all).

It is an area you can cover in 2 days or 2 years. We are now living in Guatemala and wearing off our Northern California excesses. The food and drink is outstanding. Enjoy!!

NewbE Feb 27th, 2016 10:08 AM

We always make a point of having lunch or dinner at Diavola in Geyserville: everything from pizza to entrees to dessert, to beer and wine selections, is great.

Our top choice in Sonoma is Scopa, in Healdsburg. Tiny, so reservations essential most nights. For something fancier in Healdsburg, we like Charlie Palmer's Dry Creek Kitchen; no corkage fee if you bring your own Sonoma wine.

We enjoyed Zazu when it was in Santa Rosa, I understand it's moved to the Barlow complex in Sebastopol.

travelgourmet Feb 27th, 2016 12:12 PM

Just to get something out of the way... Sonoma is significantly larger than Napa Valley, so I have no idea why someone would say there is less ground to cover. I mean, Sonoma County is almost three times the size of Napa and roughly three times the population. And the wineries are less concentrated to boot.

That being said, if you wanted to do Sonoma, I find the area north of Santa Rosa to be more rewarding for tasting than the Southern part. Healdsburg is an excellent choice for a place to stay in Sonoma.

If you wanted to stay in Napa (I find tasting in Napa to be more rewarding), I like staying in St Helena. There are some good restaurants in town, including Market which we enjoyed on a recent stay. Yountville is also a good option to stay in. If you wanted to break the bank, the Restaurant at Meadowood is absolutely phenomenal.

In general, two days would be enough time to get a feel for one of the valleys. I'd probably not do both in that amount of time, but it certainly is possible.

janisj Feb 27th, 2016 02:09 PM

>>I mean, Sonoma County is almost three times the size of Napa and roughly three times the population. <<

That is more than a bit deceiving since that includes the areas of Sonoma County along the 101 corridor and across the mountains / along the coast.

The Valley of the Moon/Sonoma Valley is a fraction of the county.

MmePerdu Feb 27th, 2016 02:21 PM

"Sonoma is significantly larger than Napa ..."

I was referring to the town, not the county, why I said "nearby Sonoma" rather than nearby Sonoma County. I find the town of Sonoma and the area around it more satisfying for a short visit than Napa, city or county. I might, however, choose a town in Napa Valley, Calistoga, for example. I think it does help the conversation to be specific when a name without specifics can mean so many things to some here.

travelgourmet Feb 28th, 2016 06:56 AM

<i>That is more than a bit deceiving since that includes the areas of Sonoma County along the 101 corridor and across the mountains / along the coast. </i>

The fact remains that it is around 55 miles from the southern Sonoma wineries to the northern Sonoma wineries, while Downtown Napa to the northern Napa wineries is around 30 miles. And Napa has a lot of land that doesn't have any wineries either. Touring Napa wineries basically involves two roads of only 30 miles long, which is why I don't think the statement that there is a lot of ground to cover in Napa is at all accurate.

<i>I was referring to the town, not the county, why I said "nearby Sonoma" rather than nearby Sonoma County.</i>

<snip>

<i>I think it does help the conversation to be specific when a name without specifics can mean so many things to some here.</i>

I agree, and I think saying "nearby Sonoma" is not specific enough when the conversation is wine tasting and the entire region is routinely called "Sonoma".

MmePerdu Feb 28th, 2016 07:52 AM

Oh, my.

"...the entire region is routinely called "Sonoma"."

As a 4th generation Bay Area Californian, I think not. But maybe among outsiders. Carry on.

JulieEC Feb 28th, 2016 08:00 AM

Oy vey.

To the OP.... You have 2 days with one valley which is 55 miles and another which is 30.

I believe if you don't rent a Hugo, you should be fine.

I'm convinced you will love either. So enjoy!

MmePerdu Feb 28th, 2016 08:11 AM

"...you will love either."

I absolutely agree.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM.