Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

I'm looking for a two day scenic drive ending up in Seattle

Search

I'm looking for a two day scenic drive ending up in Seattle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 07:04 PM
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whitey, I'm weighing in late on this , but let me share my experiences.
First, Endless Ocean bores me, I must confess.
You have 2 ways to come north from SF, either up and over to I-5, or up Ca 1 and 101.
One way we like to come up is through the Napa Valley, on to Calistoga, and over on Ca 20 to I 5 at Williams. This is pretty, but better, has a lot of food stops along the way. You motor north with Mt. Shasta in view, hitting the mountains and on to Asland for the
bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 07:15 PM
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi BBQ,
Your message got a little cutoff, but thanks, I appreciate the input. I was wondering if the drive completely along the ocean needed a few inroads here and there to break it up a bit. I live a couple blocks from ocean here in RI, so I do get to see the water quite a bit on a daily basis. My plans are still wide open, so thanks to anyone with some ideas and comments.
Whitey
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 07:18 PM
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whoops!
...on to Ashland and the Rogue Valley for the evening. I've plugged the Ashland Area a fair amount on here, and I know it's a unique expierence you'd enjoy. From here, you'd travel to Grants Pass, then follow US 199 back to the Coast and through the top of the Redwoods at Jedidah Smith State Park(better than the National Park).
There you'd hit 101 and head North.
You could cut over at Or 18, US 26 and head into Portland, or keep going on 101 to Astoria.
The other way we have friends come is to take 1/101 from SF, then head to the Rogue Valley on US 199, coming to Ashland, then up I-5 to
Eugene, and back to the coast on 126, and on up.
This allows you to see some of Oregon's best known cities and attractions, as the coast is mostly devoid of folks.
Our favorite towns on the coast are Yachats and Astoria, for what that's worth.
You can do it in two days, but three would make
for a worthwhile trip.
I think you should reverse your route and stay on the West Coast up and down, but that's me.
The Great Basin is no Match for the Pacific Northwest.

bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 07:49 PM
  #24  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks BBQ,
I've been able to follow on the map most of your routes, but I can't locate Ashland; although I'm sure it's right in front of me and I'm just sleepy.
Whitey
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 07:51 PM
  #25  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just found it. Didn't realize it was in Oregon.
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 09:10 PM
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here ya go, Whitey.
http://www.sova.org
http://www.ashlandchamber.com
http://www.mtshastachamber.com/livehist.html
http://www.skimountaineer.com/Cascad...adeWebCams.php
http://www.viamagazine.com/top_stori.../ashland06.asp
You might consider Seeing Crater Lake and Bend also
Just a few links to gum up your plans.
We've done the coast all the Way from Marin to Victoria, but as I stated earlier, most of the folks are inland.
bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 21st, 2006, 10:05 PM
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 97,182
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
There is NO way that Seattle to San Francisco is an 8 hour drive!
suze is offline  
Old Jan 22nd, 2006, 12:10 PM
  #28  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBQ,
Thanks for the websites, some interesting history.
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 22nd, 2006, 12:11 PM
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I re-input SF to Seattle in Mapquest : 12 hrs 43 min. I must have read it wrong originally.
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 22nd, 2006, 12:20 PM
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's still not realistic. It's 6-7 hr from SF to RV, another 5-6 to Portland, and another 3-4 to Seattle, and that's if you are not stopping.
bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 22nd, 2006, 12:36 PM
  #31  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey BBQ,
I'll probably do the SF to Seattle trip only one direction. So with that in mind, would you suggest I drive Napa and then the I5 to Ashland and stay the night. Next day, loop around 199 through the Smith state park, then take my time along the Oregon coast, heading inland when I've seen enough of the ocean. If that sounds right, where's a nice town to stop in for the night if I don't make it to Seattle on the second day?
Thanks,
Whitey
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 22nd, 2006, 12:59 PM
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If things are going good, you should make it to Seattle middle of the 3rd day.
Yachats is my favorite town on the coast.
Tiny and cool.
http://www.yachats.org/
There's also Cape Kiwanda Inn and the Pelican Pub Brewery-
http://www.pelicanbrewery.com/
http://www.innatcapekiwanda.com/home.html
or Astoria-
http://www.rosebriar.net/discover.html
...or you could cut back in at 126 to Eugene, also cool, or hit I-5 and motor on to Portland for the night.
bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 22nd, 2006, 02:44 PM
  #33  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks BBQ,
You're the man..the brewery looks right up my alley!
Whitey
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 23rd, 2006, 02:45 PM
  #34  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From SF to Seattle, I would go up Hwy 1 from SF, up through Marin and Sonoma counties, and get onto 101 when 1 ends (you CAN just take 101 from the city if time is short, it just doesn't meet the coast for a while). Head up through the redwoods-this is an amazing, gorgeous drive. I'd stick to the Oregon Coast until you get short on time, then head up I-5 to Seattle. Definitely stop at Mt. Rainier or St. Helens on the way to Seattle.
christy1 is offline  
Old Jan 23rd, 2006, 03:01 PM
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SF to Seattle is 14 hours if you bomb straight through on the interstate. I too have made in 12, but that's risking a ticket the whole way. And bombing straight through on the interstate is BORING. It's only for people trying to make time, period.

If you're looking for scenery, take the coast route, and take two days. Even then, you won't be stopping for much; just driving. It's a MUCH longer and MUCH slower route.

If I were you, trying to get all the way over to Glacier, I would NOT go via Omak. The drive from Twisp to Omak is pretty, but very slow going. I would cruise straight down through Winthrop.

Unfortunately if you're trying to get as far as Glacier, you're going to have to make choices. For instance, you won't be able to fit in the lovely drive through Grand Coulee -- that's between the town of Grand Coulee and Coulee City. Gorgeous, but you've got a TON of miles to pick up. You have to choose: Grand Coulee Dam, OR Omak - Kettle Falls - Pend Oreille. I would choose the latter because I've seen the dam, but you haven't, so I dunno.

Just getting to Glacier is going to be hard enough. You definitely want to do US 2, I think; there are numerous scenic routes but you don't have time to do them all, or any but one, really. US 2 gives you a fast route but loads to look at. The stretch across the middle of WA is going to seem like driving on the moon to an Easterner (now, imagine more than twice as far, and you've got the REAL West of Montana). Basically, when you're calculating your time, I would assume that any travel on state highways (i.e., not on US 2 or the Interstate) is going to be in the 45-mph range. Mountain driving is slow going sometimes.
fnarf999 is offline  
Old Jan 23rd, 2006, 04:31 PM
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,397
Received 79 Likes on 8 Posts
Having driven between Seattle and SF using both I-5 and 101, oh, maybe, 60 or 70 times, my recommendation is to take 101. In strict driving terms, i.e., hours behind the wheel with the motor running, and not breaking any speed limits (well, within reason ) I have found the coast to be roughly 5 hours longer than taking I-5. (And from LAX, by the way, roughly 7 hours longer - that's all.) Now that's using I-5 for some distance - either to Olympia then cutting over, or, my favorite but requiring a couple hours of sensory deprivation on I-5 in the Chehalis-Portland and Portland-Eugene bits, is Oregon SR38 between Drain and Reedsport, along the beautiful Umpqua river canyon.

Obviously conditions will vary, as will things like traffic, road construction, etc., but saying that the coast is much, much slower than the freeway doesn't jibe with my experience. The OP wants an overnight anyway, so the coast is the ticket.

Stopping in Ashland, or using the US101-US199 crossover is okay, but the northbound timing from SF is poor. Leaving SF in the morning it's a long day to Grants Pass; if you overnight in the Redwoods then the Rogue Valley is too close to warrant a stopover. Besides, in the summer the Rogue Valley is often hot enough to melt your tires; not my kind of place. YMMV.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Jan 24th, 2006, 05:17 AM
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my experience, people who don't live around Mountains are fascinated by them, especially if they already live by the Ocean. The first sight of Mt. Shasta looming is just plain like nothing in RI,
I'll wager.
bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 24th, 2006, 09:47 AM
  #38  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the insight everyone, you've been great with the suggestions. I know it is early, but I've been shopping airfare a bit and it's quite expensive in comparitve terms flying out of Montana or Wyoming. As a backup plan, I thought I might consider extending the end of the trip, so as to fly out of a major city like Denver, Salt lake city, etc. Also as a backup, I thought I would explore bbq's suggestion of keeping the entire trip in the Pacific northwest as opposed to heading toward Glacier and Montana. Any thoughts? Thanks,
Whitey
whitey is offline  
Old Jan 24th, 2006, 10:06 AM
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do The olympic Penisula & Makah Nation.
http://www.northolympic.com/makah/
Take the ferry from Port Angeles to Victoria, them explore Vancouver Island and on over to Vancouver. then back and fly out of Seattle
bbqboy is offline  
Old Jan 24th, 2006, 10:11 AM
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.northolympic.com/makah/map.html
bbqboy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -