Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   United States (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/)
-   -   Disney or Universal (https://www.fodors.com/community/united-states/disney-or-universal-445274/)

tnantx Oct 7th, 2008 10:11 AM

Disney or Universal
 
We are taking our 10 and 11 year old girls soccer team to LA for a tournament in January (over MLK weekend). Most are staying Monday and we plan to go to either Disney or Universal for the day (might go on Sunday as well depending on when the finals are). I tend to want to go to Disney as I think it is more age appropriate but others are inclined to Universal for the cost factor (already spending $$$ for the weekend and tournament). What do you all think?

coldplay Oct 7th, 2008 10:15 AM

Universal is more apropriate to 10 and 11 year olds, the Anaheim Disney is not as good as the Florida one and is geared more to younger children. Universal is amazing.

halfapair Oct 7th, 2008 11:03 AM

What would your kids prefer? Have they been to D-land before and would like to see Universal?

Both are great for them. There is plenty at both parks for kids in their age range.

sylvia3 Oct 7th, 2008 12:41 PM

Universal, hands down!

janisj Oct 7th, 2008 02:11 PM

&quot;<i>Universal is more apropriate to 10 and 11 year olds, the Anaheim Disney is not as good as the Florida one and is geared more to younger children.</i>&quot;

That is silly - Disneyland is not &quot;geared&quot; to younger children. SOME of Disneyland is for young ones, but most of it if for anyone of any age. Disneyland is great - FL DW fans do try to convince otherwise.

I would normally recommend Disneyland. But honestly - my decision would be more geared to <u>where</u> we were staying. If up north - I'd go to Universal. If South LA/Orange County - I'd go to Disney.

Both are fun.

beachbum Oct 7th, 2008 03:33 PM

I'm trying to understand the recommendation for Universal. We took our mid-late teens kids to both parks last year, and after Disneyland, Universal was a complete let down. What do they have there, maybe a dozen attractions (rides and shows)? Even City Walk, which years ago was great fun, has lost most of its appeal.

Go with Disneyland.

toncasmo Oct 7th, 2008 03:41 PM

DISNEYLAND all the way- no thought needed!!

Ryan Oct 7th, 2008 03:50 PM

If I'm not mistaken they are about 40 miles apart. You might want to factor in where you'll be staying in relation to either place.

My vote would be for Disneyland with California Adventure thrown in.

logandog Oct 7th, 2008 03:54 PM

Disneyland.

Netfeather Oct 7th, 2008 04:02 PM

Disney offers a ton more to do for kids and adults.

happytrailstoyou Oct 7th, 2008 04:33 PM


I can't believe there is a quandary: Disneyland.


bennnie Oct 8th, 2008 07:57 AM

We went to DL this August with our 15 and 12 year old daughters. We didn't buy the park hopper as it would have added too much to the cost of the ticket. We were there from 10am to 11pm - there was so much to do. We all loved it even though we had been to WDW 4 times before.

Another option to consider is Knotts Berry Farm. There were crazy roller coasters galore but tamer entertainment too. About the same price as Universal and a lot of bang for your buck. Not sure about the hours in Janaury.

lvk Oct 8th, 2008 08:25 AM

I know it wasn't one of your original options, but I second the suggestion of Knott's. At $23/ticket for up to age 11, it is a fraction of the price of the two other parks. It has great rides, and since the lines are usually much shorter, you get more action for that money.

My kids (now 13 &amp; 15) have always preferred Knott's over all of the Southern Cal. theme parks. www.knotts.com/park/guest/ticket.shtml It has something for all ages. Our German houseguests did both Universal and Knott's last month and gave Knott's much higher grades.

My daughter went to DL with friends last weekend and said she couldn't shake the feeling of being &quot;ripped off&quot; (of course it may be because Mom made her pay for 1/2 of her $69 ticket out of her own earnings. :) )

If you have your heart set on one of the two brand names, then I would have to go with Disneyland for your kids' age group.


HillaryJane Oct 8th, 2008 09:38 AM

Disneyland...you will be let down by Universal for sure! Spend the $$ on Disney

Hill
www.edufire.com

logandog Oct 8th, 2008 10:03 AM

I think it's an issue of quality, from the architecture to the landscaping to the attractions. You just won't find the depth and complexity of &quot;Indiana Jones&quot; or&quot;Pirates&quot; at Universal.
For real film and TV buffs, Universal offers more with it's backlot tours,
Disneyland has a certain magic about it for all ages. When you through in California Adventure ther is no contest.

lvk Oct 8th, 2008 10:07 AM

If you &quot;throw in&quot; California Adventure, you are talking $96 per person. The OP's group was concerned about the cost factor.

logandog Oct 8th, 2008 10:43 AM

value factor

Guenmai Oct 8th, 2008 11:49 PM

I definitely vote for Disney. I'm from L.A. area and have been going since the late 50s when I was a very small child and I still love to go. It's for ALL ages. And it's great to go to the original one. I haven't been to the Florida one, but was at the opening for the one in Paris back in the 90s and it wasn't Anaheim. Smiles! Happy Travels!

missypie Oct 9th, 2008 05:40 AM

Disneyland, for sure. Quite a few of the rides at Universal are scary...maybe too intense for 10 year olds. Plus, when we were at Universal at a not busy time (so no long lines) we truly ran out of things to do. There is a LOT of walking at the CA location and just not a lot of attractions.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:15 AM.