| Bill_H |
Jun 8th, 2010 01:48 PM |
200-400 f/4 VR (if that's what you have) is probably perfect (I'm a Canon user and only wish Canon had something this good). 70-200 is a nice 2nd lens for landscapes etc, or for when a bear gets really really close.
<b>I know that the bear viewing is close</b>
I've been to both Brooks (several times) and Hallo Bay (fall) and basically at Brooks you can use all the focal length you can carry (I usually used a 500 mm w/ 1.4x t/c). You are supposed to stay at least 50 yards from single bears and 100 yards from moms with cubs except for when the bears approach the platforms. Occasionally while walking the trails you'll find yourself very close to bears but you are not supposed to tarry and photograph them at leisure at close range. Instead you are supposed to move quietly off. So you'll be close at times, but can't stay close to shoot without getting a warning or ticket from the Rangers.
At Hallo Bay, again having a long lens is very useful (probably your 200-400 with the 1.4x) as much of the time the bears are a ways off. However sometimes these bears will walk right up to you, within a few yards, and the 70-200 will be enough.
FWIW, as a Canon shooter my ideal gear would be 500 f/4 IS, 300 f/2.8 IS and 70-200 f/4 IS, but I had trouble flying with and carrying all of this plus a heavy tripod with Wimberly pivot head, two pro bodies, etc etc. For Nikon shooters the 200-400 and a 500 or 600 f/4 would be perfect, but the 200-400 VR is the most versatile all-around weapon, with f/4 speed and excellent image quality. So what you have is very good.
|