Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

California (San Francisco, Napa,Carmel/Monterey,Santa Barbara,San Diego)

Search

California (San Francisco, Napa,Carmel/Monterey,Santa Barbara,San Diego)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30th, 2013, 08:48 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
California (San Francisco, Napa,Carmel/Monterey,Santa Barbara,San Diego)

Hi Everyone,

I am looking to go to California this summer. Here is my current itinerary:

San Francisco - 3 nights
Napa Valley - 2 Nights
Carmel or Monterey - 2 Nights
Santa Barbara - 1 Night
Los Angeles - 1 Night
San Diego - 2 Nights

For Napa Valley - I can't figure out where is the best place to stay? We are wine lovers and heard Yountville might be the place to go... However, I also heard Calistoga and St. Helena is nice too. I just do not want to stay in downtown Napa. I want the rolling hills and wineries close by. Somewhere we can do biking would be nice too.

I am not sure whether I should stay in Monterey or Carmel.

We would like to do the 17 mile drive and Big Sur.

Any advice on my itinerary or places to stay would be appreciated. I have never done a trip like this before and we are going for our one year wedding anniversary at the end of August.

Thank you
Alexis2222 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 09:05 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too many cities; not enough time.

Your itinerary has you driving north to Napa from SF, then south past SF to Carmel. I think you should concentrate on one area: like northern CA, and drop San Diego. Maybe drop L.A, too. One night there will only be frustrating.

Or, you could replace Napa with wineries down by Santa Barbara.

Have you already bought airfare?
Tabernash2 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 09:23 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72,757
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 7 Posts
You have just over 1 day for Monterey / Carmel, almost no time in Santa Barbara, half a day in LA, 1.5 days in SD.

I agree with Tabernash. Cut back on destinations or add days . . .
janisj is online now  
Old May 30th, 2013, 10:28 AM
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

No I have not bought airfare.
Alexis2222 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 11:05 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 17,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you base yourself in SF, you could do a day trip to Napa, or Sonoma (which I prefer), instead of staying there, and then move south to Monterey/Carmel, but the southern portion of your trip does seem worryingly short. I think you could have a wonderful trip dividing your 11 nights between SF, wine country and Monterey/Carmel, have enough time to enjoy them, and save the southern part of the state for another trip.
NewbE is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 11:24 AM
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, it was my husband who absolutely wanted to go to San Diego, but after the comments here I think I convinced him to remove both Los Angeles and San Diego.
Alexis2222 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 11:45 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good decision. Maybe you can get to Yosemite now.
Tabernash2 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 01:13 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree - fewer destinations will make for a better trip. You'll just have to come back for another trip to CA to see the southern part

With 11 nights you could add Yosemite, or you could stick to the coast. You might want to go as far south as Cambria or Pismo Beach - drive through Big Sur, visit Hearst Castle.

Whether to stay in Monterey or Carmel...

Carmel is a very (super, uber) cute, romantic town with a gorgeous beach. It is upscale with plenty of galeries and shops.

Monterey is larger and busier. It is on the bay and has some nice rocky coastline and some beaches. More of the tourist attractions are in Monterey - most notably Canery Row and the aquarium. You have more of a diverse atmosphere in Monterey than in Carmel.

In between the two is Pacific Grove - nice small town with a beautiful, rocky coastline. It is quieter than Monterey, but not as upscale as Carmel. The downtown has quite a few shops and restaurants.

I personally prefer Monterey and Pacific Grove to Carmel, which is just a little too upscale for my tastes - and I can only handle so much cuteness before my teeth start to hurt It is nice and a lot of people absolutely love it, it's just not my style. All 3 towns are within minutes of each other though, so you can easily stay in one and visit the others.
november_moon is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 01:28 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>>All 3 towns are within minutes of each other though.
sf7307 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2013, 01:50 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why Napa? its crammed with tourists and limo's with wedding parties. If you like wine, head for Healdsburg in Sonoma County. Easier to get to, right up #101 from the Golden Gate bridge. Lovely rolling hills, great food, charming wineries. So much nicer than Napa.
kleroux is offline  
Old May 31st, 2013, 12:49 PM
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you so much for all of your feedback.
I am trying to revise my itinerary. We plan for August 17 to August 28.

Kleroux: I will take a look and research more on Sonoma instead of Napa.

I would love to go to Yosemite but I think I would be missing out on the drive through Big Sur. Not sure if i can add that in or I might have to do that on another trip.

November_moon : I really like your idea of : You might want to go as far south as Cambria or Pismo Beach - drive through Big Sur, visit Hearst Castle. I will look into that.

Anyone been to Paso Robles?
Alexis2222 is offline  
Old May 31st, 2013, 01:11 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been to Paso Robles. Nice small town (but so are so many).
sf7307 is offline  
Old May 31st, 2013, 01:24 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 27,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We also prefer to stay in Pacific Grove. For a beautiful B&B where they know how to treat their guests and have excellent breakfasts, views that are the best in town....try The Seven Gables Inn. We have stayed there twice and loved it both times.

http://www.thesevengablesinn.com/
DebitNM is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 09:53 AM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another vote for staying in Pacific Grove - the beaches are much less populated than in Carmel & very scenic, and it's close to the Aquarium which is a "must see" in my opinion.

Hearst Castle is fun/interesting, but if you can swing the cost, stay in Big Sur instead of Cambria. Cambria a cute beach town, but there's not much more than a boardwalk & some small restaurants - although the lodging is much cheaper than Big Sur. I would skip on Paso Robles personally.

If you need less expensive accommodations, keep your eye on travel deal sites like travelzoo, there are often lots of deals for Carmel/Monterey and Cambria - although in August it will be pricier.
CRIdo is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 10:17 AM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seven Gables is beautiful and in a terrific location. It is above my budget, so I have never stayed there, but if I could, I would
november_moon is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 11:07 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am very familiar with Paso Robles. In August, it is bound to be very hot. I would avoid it and stay on the coast in that region, Cambria would be my favorite. Cayucos is a smaller town on the coast. If your stays are Sunday - Thursday along the coast the prices will be a lower than Friday- Saturday.
trippinkpj is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 11:37 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 26,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are wine lovers and heard Yountville might be the place to go... However, I also heard Calistoga and St. Helena is nice too.

St. Helena is a charming little town, which I really like. Yountville is nice too, a little less charming, but with better restaurants. I think Calistoga is too far north for the best Napa wineries, but it might be the best option if you wanted to spend one day touring Napa and another day touring Northern Sonoma.

Why Napa? its crammed with tourists and limo's with wedding parties.

Nonsense.

If you like wine, head for Healdsburg in Sonoma County.

If you like wine, you would know that both Napa and Sonoma have excellent wineries.

So much nicer than Napa.

I have no idea why some insist upon slagging on Napa so much. I suspect they think it "cool" to say that they prefer Sonoma as if they are somehow clued into some secret, when Sonoma hasn't been a secret in years.

Personally, I have a great time in both Napa and Sonoma, but I like wine a heck of a lot more than I like silly reverse snobbery. In both places, the wineries we go to are invariably staffed by great people serving great wine. There are great restaurants in both places. And all these "tourists and limo's" must be heading to different wineries than I do. If being around <gasp> tourists like you is particularly bothersome, going on a weekday takes care of that better than switching valleys.

I would also note that the contrast offered up is grossly overplayed. Sonoma is not some low-key Eden and is probably the second most commercialized wine tasting experience you will find in the US. Is it marginally more low-key than Napa? Sure, but the difference is not nearly as great as some would have you believe. Sonoma and Napa are far more alike than they are different.

You want low-key? Keep driving up to Philo...
travelgourmet is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 12:17 PM
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I LOVE Cambria, we stayed at a fab "motel" this past November right opposite the ocean on Moonstone beach and next door to an amazing seafood restuarant ( the Seachest - closed Tuesdays) it's also only a few minutes drive away from Hearst castle. You could stay here 1 night and do HC either on the way or the following morning.

I also LOVE Carmel and like its cuteness, you can base here and do the 17 mike drive and visit Monterey. Great food in Carmel too.

I liked Yountville,( although we last stayed there 8 years ago) again great food and you can visit the Mumm winery too!
Smeagol is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 12:19 PM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just realised I didn't write the name of the "motel" in Cambria, it was called the sand pebbles inn, I would stay there again for sure. We had an upstairs seaview room.
Smeagol is offline  
Old Jun 5th, 2013, 02:02 PM
  #20  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does seem to be the "thing" to bag on Napa. My own father "doesn't drink" wine from Napa. Yeah, whatever dad. Miss out on some good wine in order to be "cool" No problem - more for me.

I do think that sometimes visitors get too focused on Napa - it is the big name area that they have heard of and that focus sometimes limits their thinking. So I do bring up other areas as possibilities, but not to convince people not to visit Napa, just to consider the other possibilities - make sure they know the options.
november_moon is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -