Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List?

Search

Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 06:20 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List?

Pretty scary stuff....

http://cbsnewyork.com/topstories/loc...036144559.html
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 06:48 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup- we really live in the land of the free
brando is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 07:12 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup.

This is the new blacklist -- instead of not being able to work in Hollywood, we won't be allowed to fly there.
sfowler is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 07:17 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only 210 days until November 2nd!
jnn1964 is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 07:43 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While I don't disagree that the handling of the no-fly list has been poorly executed, we can't be blind to the fact that it is no longer September 10, 2001.

The problem with the list is that mistakes like this, divert focus away from serious flaws in airline security. Resources will be diverted from real issues to something like the list that essentially has limited practical value.

That said, having a methodology to determine potential problems isn't irrational. The old days of "CODE", the only training I received while working for two airlines in the late '80s, has clearly passed. The bottom line is we need to have a way of identifying potential problems that is more sophisticated than "did you pack your own bag."

BTW, CODE stands for Cash, One-Way, Difficulty with English. We were told took view that as the sign of a potential threat.
Ryan is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 08:42 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately, the old days of racial profiling for terror suspects are long gone, thanks to PC'ness. So, the feds have to get more, ahem, creative. Of course, there will be occasional errors made, as these ladies discovered.

I'm looking forward to the start-up of TSA allowing frequent flyers to pay a little cash and have a background check done in advance to be cleared through airport security more quickly.
ChristieP is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 08:58 AM
  #7  
weenie57
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That is a scary article! I feel bad for anyone of color flying today, especially if you appear middle eastern. It's hard. I saw on the news a man who has the same name as someone on the list, but he is not a terrorist, just a regular American citizen. Needless to say, he has a little trouble flying anyplace!

It appears that even the Iraqis in their new constitution will have more rights than us...Article 15 states, ?No one may be unlawfully arrested or detained, and no one may be detained by reason of political or religious beliefs.? I guess what amazes me is that the conservative Republicans claim to believe in smaller government...
 
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 09:55 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If one person gets thru' and causes a disaster-are all the people going to say'oops-sorry'

I don't think so, then we will have to blame someone and then have Congressional hearings,onandon.

Do it right from the beginning-there are people that have publicly stated many times that they want to kill us-who is going to be the one to let them thru the gate if they have a doubt.?
maryann is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 09:58 AM
  #9  
weenie57
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, the other thing I don't understand is why would a terrorist fly using his real name? I mean I know they did on Sept 11, but that was then, this is now.
 
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 10:04 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And why would a terrorist, hell-bent on becoming a martyr, getting his 72 virgins, and knowledgable of the "1-way ticket" automatically making you suspicious not just buy round trip tickets? (woops! I now might be blacklisted!)
rb_travelerxATyahoo is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2004, 02:06 PM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Similar story, and ACLU's involvement:

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/...y_x.htm?csp=28

Maybe this is a tactic to "pursuade" people to signup (and PAY) to be a "Trusted Flyer" ??
rb_travelerxATyahoo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andrew
Air Travel
7
Jun 15th, 2009 04:48 PM
notoairtran
Air Travel
11
Jan 10th, 2005 04:32 AM
Litespeed_Chick
United States
21
May 28th, 2004 12:33 PM
abc
Air Travel
4
Oct 28th, 2002 10:59 AM
Tom
United States
12
Jul 24th, 2002 10:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -