Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Travel Tips & Trip Ideas
Reload this Page >

A fun game! Who wants to play...

Search

A fun game! Who wants to play...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20th, 2007, 11:10 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A fun game! Who wants to play...

The rules are easy -- all you have to do is locate the items called "hidden costs" in the picture. Did you spot them all? Can you think of any additional ones that aren't shown?

Enjoy the game!

<b>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/pdf/20070625_essay.pdf</b>


<i>p.s. - please, no cheating or wagering</i>



-
bluestar is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007, 11:23 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is at least one other one. Many of the farmers in Mexico are burning off the algave fields to plant corn since they can make more money from the corn. Thus, the supply of tequila will decrease and of course the price will go up and those of us that like margaritas will have to pay more. Darn it!!
Reisender is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007, 11:25 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very funny. How about the hidden costs in petroleum fuels?

Dependence on foreign oil.

Oil wars in the middle east.

The human and financial cost of waring to secure the supply of the war.

Air pollution, green house gases.

Higher prices at the pump.

Our inability to control our own destiny.

I am sure that you will not be laughing a few years from now when we will need ethanol to keep America running and free.

jorr is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007, 06:25 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly this is true. We already are paying for corn-based fuel, in the form of higher taxes, higher gasoline prices and higher food prices. But to make matters even worse, because of the prodigious amounts of energy and fertilizer used in its cultivation, production and distribution, corn-based ethanol provides little or no net reduction in CO2 over the gasoline it displaces.

Just another one put over on the American people by the environmentalists, Congress and special interests like Archer-Daniel.
Jack is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007, 06:31 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jack, you're making sense. Are you sure you're not really Budman?
Budman is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007, 07:23 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually Jack (and Budman) the true environmentalists know that ethanol has more energy inputs than outputs and therefore does not make a viable &quot;replacement&quot; to oil. Blame the politicians please. They're the ones who are waving this as next big thing when its just a boondoggle, pork barelling.
irecommend is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2007, 10:19 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Higher gasoline prices? E-85 is about 40 cents less per gallon! Ethanol has 0 emissions of American blood and creates 0 profits for middle east anti-American interests and terrorism funding. The multi-millionaire bin-Ladin family profited off of us through oil and used it to attack us.

jorr is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2007, 10:23 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jorr,
Are you aware that the government is subsidizing the cost of ethanol?
Jack is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2007, 10:27 AM
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't you get less miles per gallon with ethanol? Doesn't the manufacturing of it actually cause more pollution because it's so corrosive that it can't be pipelined like regular gasoline but rather has to trucked to destination? Don't the risks of crop failure/drought/long-term climate-change present a new set of energy independence risks?
bluestar is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2007, 10:44 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jack, if you knew anything, you'd know that real environmentalists are NOT for ethanol- and know the difference.
lynnejoel1015 is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2007, 10:49 PM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah Jack. You big know nothing. Even a baby liberal can tell a real greenie from a fake greenie! Next thing you know, you'll be asking Ted Kennedy for permission to build those big, ugly old wind thingamjiggies on Cape cod!
degas is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2007, 10:49 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E-85 Ethanol or whatever blend big oil-big auto wants to pull over on us is just a ploy for big profits.

Read &quot;The Omnivore's Dilemma&quot; and &quot;The End of Oil&quot; to learn more about big agriculture and this farce.
lynnejoel1015 is offline  
Old Jun 23rd, 2007, 05:06 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Jack

The environmentalists are not to be blamed for ethanol, quite the contrary. The car makers and the gas companies prefer the ethanol route and the electric or hybrid one since, with ethanol, they do not have to make investments. Their current engines and processes are fine. Proof of that: President Bush is pro ethanol
travelingmad is offline  
Old Jun 23rd, 2007, 05:09 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I meant &quot;than&quot; the electric or hybrid...

sorry
travelingmad is offline  
Old Jun 23rd, 2007, 06:12 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive already said the same thing in this thread!
irecommend is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lincasanova
Africa & the Middle East
5
Nov 22nd, 2007 04:02 AM
stitchintime
Asia
10
Jan 5th, 2006 08:26 AM
jazzyred
Europe
10
Apr 28th, 2005 02:49 PM
platzer
Europe
7
Mar 11th, 2004 06:10 AM
Worts
Mexico & Central America
8
Jan 26th, 2003 09:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -