Britain's least popular tourist attractions
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Britain's least popular tourist attractions
http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/...=gallery&ino=4
I feel that I want to visit the poor things
I feel that I want to visit the poor things
#3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the looks of some of the places, but it's hard to track down actual info and know where/how to visit!
I have found http://www.northingsfarmmuseum.co.uk/nifm/ b/c agricultural stuff and railway .. I'd love to visit. It's only open a day a month in the warm months, so that's prob. a reason so few visit.
I have found http://www.northingsfarmmuseum.co.uk/nifm/ b/c agricultural stuff and railway .. I'd love to visit. It's only open a day a month in the warm months, so that's prob. a reason so few visit.
#6
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This story is illogical. Who initially designated them tourist locations and how can they be tourist sights, if no one visits them? And how about places that are not designated as tourist stops, that tourists do visit, how are they counted.
If there is one things these Brits don't get, it's irony.
If there is one things these Brits don't get, it's irony.
#8
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 7,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was in Durham this summer, and would definitely have gone to St. Andrew's Church to see the two 9th century Anglo-Saxon crosses, if I had known about them. I suppose I'll just have to go back!
The windmill shown is open only five days each year, so 125 visitors in a year is actually fairly respectable.
The windmill shown is open only five days each year, so 125 visitors in a year is actually fairly respectable.
#9
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 7,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've just done a little investigating, and can't find any St. Andrew's Church in Durham. No wonder it gets so few visitors!
There's a St. Andrew's Church in Bishop Aukland, but its web site says nothing about 9th century crosses.
And there's a St. Andrew's Church in Bywell, with some fragments of Saxon crosses, but the photo of the church looks nothing like the photo on the Independent web site.
There's a St. Andrew's Church in Bishop Aukland, but its web site says nothing about 9th century crosses.
And there's a St. Andrew's Church in Bywell, with some fragments of Saxon crosses, but the photo of the church looks nothing like the photo on the Independent web site.
#11
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
>>Who initially designated them tourist locations and how can they be tourist sights, if no one visits them? <<
The old term used to be "places of interest". They exist, and somewhere along the line someone, or the local community, decided they have some cultural value. Whether or not they are for "tourists" as opposed to everyone else is another matter.
The old term used to be "places of interest". They exist, and somewhere along the line someone, or the local community, decided they have some cultural value. Whether or not they are for "tourists" as opposed to everyone else is another matter.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAmbrose
Europe
10
Jan 10th, 2010 09:45 AM