Cancun - low key beach suggestions
 

Three adult women thinking of a first time beach vacation in Cancun area - we are not familiar with the different areas and would like a place that is low key, safe with nice beach - any suggestions would be most appreciated -

Well I would not describe Cancun itself as "low key" since it has many high rise hotels. But since you used the word "area" maybe look into Isla Mujeres (mostly laid back with a beautiful calm shallow beach on Playa Norte), Puerto Morelos (small fishing village) or possibly Half Moon Bay in north Akumal.
Are you looking for a hotel, condo, or villa/house rental?
If hotel, are you looking for an AI (all-inclusive) and if so do you want AO (adults only)?
Also time of year and budget per night for lodging only would help others give better advice.

You might also consider Playa del Carmen as a lower key alternative to Cancun.

Playa, akumal are good options.

Isla Mujeres

What's wrong, you don't like Isla Mujeres?

Why would you recommend isla Mujeres suze, when you have never been ???

I didn't say I had been there. I didn't know there were rules on Fodor's that you had to have been to a place to be able to suggest it for someone else. These people said they are not familiar with the area.

I have read a lot both online and guidebooks for the Caribbean side. And Isla Mujeres looks beautiful. Everyone I know who has gone there loves it.

AND, most importantly and the purpose of my post, it fits the request of being near Cancun but more low key, safe, and with a nice beach.

There is room for everyone to make suggestions when a question comes up. You two don't need to strain yourself playing hall monitor.

My first question to the OP is what time of the year are you thinking of going. The reason I ask is that some of the outer lying island can be quite windy during the winter months. Some people don't mind that but I hate laying on the beach while getting beaten up with sand. The water can also be a bit too choppy to dive or snorkel for my taste.
That said, places like Cancun and Playa del Carmen can actually be somewhat low key if your going at a time when locals and those from abroad aren't on vacation. You can also find smaller or sometime larger hotels that are spread out enough that you can relax.

I also recommend the Playa del Carmen or Akumal areas. You don't say if you want an all inclusive resort, adults only resort, boutique hotel, etc.

I just got back from isla mujeres. Definitely a good choice for a low key alternative to Cancun. Very easy to get to - 20 minute ferry ride. Ferry operates every half hour.

We really enjoyed Tulum for low key beach time.

how about a married couple travelling with 17 year old son? We want to travel to Cancun area etc at spring break time but avoid the parties etc. The 17 year old will need activities. Any recommendations. I like the idea of Playa Del Carmen

fngee,
Are you looking for an all inclusive resort, condo, boutique hotel,etc?

I was thinking all inclusive.

Look into the Iberostar Paraiso resort. There are four family resorts in the complex and they are all wonderful. Lots of activities all day or you can just sit and relax. Great service, huge beach, and fantastic pools.

I do not get why certain posters must critique others for stating their opinions.
I am sure most have notice the obsessive compulsive attacks by one person against me for only giving my honest thoughts on one city.
Now others are attacking Suze for writing what she believes. I just don't get it. Why we can not all state our feelings without fear of these unwarranted attacks is beyond me.

It is kind of weird stewbear.

It is strange and I have never understood why they do this.

Rohelio has a huge problem if I make any comment about the Caribbean side of Mexico since I have not visited there myself. Then SambaChula gets in the action.

I don't have to have BEEN there myself to know that Isla Mujeres is a laid back island destination or that Cancun has high rise resorts on a beach (just two examples). I have never stated anything dishonestly or misrepresented myself. Simply passed on facts that I know from friends, guidebooks, forums like this one.

I sometimes comment on colonial city itineraries that sound interesting (again something I have not done yet but know from studying about Mexico and researching for things that interest me) and no one ever has a problem with that.

Just today on the Europe board someone planning a honeymoon asked about Mexico (as a budget alternative to Europe) but didn't want to "just lay around on the beach".

So I suggested they look at some of the colonial cities and listed names for a few places.

Since I have not been to them myself, that post would not be allowed under Rohelio's forum guidelines.

Don't see anything wrong with that suze. But yeah I guess it wouldn't meet the posting criteria explained above.

<meet the posting criteria explained above>

Well fortunately it is not the posting criteria for Fodor's.

I don't see anything wrong with suze's comments either, but then Rohelio has taken exception to my comments as well on occasion. No "heightened sense of credibility" or whatever. Oh well. Life goes on ;)

“I do not get why certain posters must critique others for stating their opinions.
….Now others are attacking Suze for writing what she believes.”

“Rohelio has a huge problem if I make any comment about the Caribbean side of Mexico since I have not visited there myself. Then SambaChula gets in the action.
I don't have to have BEEN there myself to know that Isla Mujeres is a laid back island destination”

In fact, Ilha Mujeres is very touristy these days and not particularly “laid back”, unlike say Hobox, which you might understand if you (suze) didn’t get your information solely from sources other than personal experience, and had actually visited.

And those “opinions”, based on nothing more than the inquiring OP’s own (lack of) experience in the destination, can be very misleading to a poster who knows little or nothing about the area in question. People come to these forums particularly to get first-hand information from someone who’s been to the place they’re inquiring about. If not, there is a vast internet of generalized info available.

Suze can certainly “believe” what she wants, but SHE HAS NEVER BEEN to places she insists on commenting about as if she had (despite the more recent caveats she seems to have been forced into stating). She can be of the opinion that the moon is made of green cheese, because she read it somewhere and saw pictures that represented it that way to her eyes, but that doesn’t make such a guess so.

Don’t you have enough travel experience, suze, to keep busy commenting on places you HAVE been?
OR just GO to the Yucatan finally, with a small part of all the time you purport to spend in Mexico. You might actually like it in "living color" as it were.

<places she insists on commenting about as if she had>

Totally untrue. I have never pretended I have been somewhere that I have not.


<all the time you purport to spend in Mexico>

Also not true. I do not "purport" anything. Never said or implied I spend a lot of time there, since I work full-time and only get 3 weeks vacation a year. That's as much time as I spend in "Mexico" and I spend it in Puerto Vallarta.

((In fact, Ilha Mujeres is very touristy these days and not particularly “laid back”, unlike say Hobox, which you might understand if you (suze) didn’t get your information solely from sources other than personal experience, and had actually visited.))

I guess it all depends on your perspective. I was just in Isla Mujeres over Thanksgiving and found it to be pretty laid back. I'm sure not as rustic and undeveloped as Holbox but definitely laid back compared to Cancun.

instead of criticizing other posters, why don't you just stick to providing whatever advice you think Is useful to the OP. There is nothing wrong with mentioning an area of Mexico that the OP may never have heard of. The OP can then research that area on her own to see if it's what she is looking for. Nobody appointed you the posting police. Geez

Again, people come to these forums particularly to get first-hand information from someone who’s been to the place they’re inquiring about, and with the expectation that responders will have experienced the place themselves in order to give information and especially personal impressions.

If not, they could well go to some travel agent who has not been to the place, or look at the vast amount of destination information on the internet.

OR they could use all of those resources.

There is no rule on Fodor's that says all posts must contain only "first-hand information".

"My sister loved Cozumel" when I helped her plan a day there off a cruiseship... and tell what, where, how, why, is a legitimate contribution.

So we should all write "speculation" about destinations asked about?
Yeah, well, in that case, I think St. Petersburg ought to be a great tropical vacation spot in January.

Nope, sorry, doesn't work like that. It only is helpful to others if what you say is actually correct. Regardless if you have visited St. Petersburg or not.

Samba - I think you ought to give it up man (or wo-man, as the case may be :) ). Give your advice, let other people give theirs. It all good.

"Nope, sorry, doesn't work like that. It only is helpful to others if what you say is actually correct. "

SO that's why you are writing non-sense about travel to Cuba? Because it's correct? jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja