Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Would you stay in least expensive room in a luxury 5 star or top room in a top 4 star: Paris

Search

Would you stay in least expensive room in a luxury 5 star or top room in a top 4 star: Paris

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17th, 2007, 06:34 PM
  #41  
hdm
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But ira, if it's truly a 5-star hotel, every guest should be treated as the most important.
hdm is offline  
Old Jan 17th, 2007, 06:46 PM
  #42  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd stay in a 4 star...to be honest, no hotels in Europe are quite as nice as ours, so don't waste the money on something you'll prob. find mediocre anyways....enjoy your stay,..is awesome!
daisy12885 is offline  
Old Jan 17th, 2007, 07:05 PM
  #43  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey tripgirl, the one bit of advice I'd give, if they book the George V or the Plaza Athenee, is to use a Virtuoso agent. You get negotiated rates, complimentary breakfast, and an upgrade on check-in if it's available. The Plaza Athenee has a pretty special additional amenity. It's called "Concierge in a Pocket;" it's a PDA with a built-in GPS that contains maps, gives you walking directions to wherever you want to go, and provides tourist information as well as the location of restaurants and shops. Pretty neat!
travelhorizons is offline  
Old Jan 17th, 2007, 07:22 PM
  #44  
dgg
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Love this question...it's a chicken or the egg? I've been to Paris a few times but never stayed in a luxury hotel there. One thing I can recommend is never staying at a tour group hotel! As to the question at hand, why don't they look on Trip Advisor? They're usually pretty good. One thing I've found is to be careful not to assume the top rated hotels are the best, because sometimes there are a lot of budget people who post on it. You need to read all the postings, making special note to diregard some of the wackos who complain about silly stuff and give a hotel a low rating because they had to walk up and down the lobby grand staircase to get to the elevators...you know what I mean.
dgg is offline  
Old Jan 17th, 2007, 08:29 PM
  #45  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please, everyone--remember that in Paris there is no such thing as a 5* hotel, unless it's a particular chain's rating. The tourist board assigns 4*L (for luxury) as the top rating, given to hotels such as the Crillon and George V. So what you want to look at is the hotels officially rates as 4*L and forget the 5* category, which really does not exist.
Underhill is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 12:05 AM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Pavillion de la Reine is a lovely hotel in a prime location (though some rooms have some problems: ceiling slopes and elevator noise) but it's not "sumptuous." I don't think it's what your friends are looking for.
Dave_in_Paris is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 12:07 AM
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clarifying: Those "problems" are in some suites.
Dave_in_Paris is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 04:01 AM
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 23,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
The French hotel rating system is not based on the luxury of the building but of the services provided. The rooms of a 2 or 3 star hotel can be nicer than hotels with a higher star rating.

A 4*L rating means that a hotel has things like concierge service, 24-hour room service, the size of the reception, the presence of elevators, the number of languages spoken by the staff, etc. It does not mean that the rooms are necessarily charming, only that they have met minimum size criteria.
kerouac is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 04:42 AM
  #49  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This post is over a year old and you all are still arguing over 5 star vs 4 star... sheesh...

Anyway, they went with George V, had a great time, fab everything
tripgirl is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 05:40 AM
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 23,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I saw that the post was old, but it is always useful to point out that hotel rating systems are extremely variable in different countries. After all, Dubai claims to have a 7-star hotel.
kerouac is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 05:52 AM
  #51  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi hdm
>But ira, if it's truly a 5-star hotel, every guest should be treated as the most important.<

In a perfect world, yes.

ira is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 07:27 AM
  #52  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Came across this while taking a break from my "work"...Thank you all, and especially Ira, for the heartiest laughing I've had in weeks....

Stu T.
tower is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 04:35 PM
  #53  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tripgirl,
Geez- I wish I could get this much banter on my question of where to go with 8 days in France! We are considering Hotel Tremoille with a 20%discount off rack rate or Relais Christine (not sure what they'll offer off rack rate if anything). We can afford but are unwilling to pay the prices at FS and George V. DId your friends get a discount? Any other boutique hotels? We've seen thread after thread for D'Aubusson but it didn't really excite us. Thanks in advance...and I think you are great for doing so much research for your friends.
jdp867 is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 06:14 PM
  #54  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jdp,

I don't recall what they paid, but it still was expensive, but no worries about $ for them.

I like both choices Tremoille and Relais Christine; been to both and like them both.
tripgirl is offline  
Old Jan 18th, 2007, 06:20 PM
  #55  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The room itself is more important to me than the services of the hotel. I'm not one to ever use room service (I despise eating in a hotel room, no matter how palatial). Some really spectacular hotels can have some terribly small and almost shabby rooms.

Add me to the list that would rather come down a notch of the hotel itself and get the nicest room there.

And I also agree that if you are in the nicest room of a smaller fine hotel, you will get better service than in the big hotel anyway.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
excited_confused
Europe
9
Mar 6th, 2012 08:49 AM
JSmitty
Europe
7
Jun 9th, 2004 11:16 AM
travelerquestion
Europe
18
Nov 21st, 2003 09:55 AM
TwoCents
United States
7
Jun 19th, 2003 02:29 PM
Tami
Europe
14
Jan 24th, 2003 07:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -