Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

What's a realistic target weekly rent for London in July?

Search

What's a realistic target weekly rent for London in July?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14th, 2006, 02:18 PM
  #41  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've never seen or heard of an apartment rental in London where they add VAT on top of the stated price. But I'm not going to say it isn't possible.
 
Old Apr 14th, 2006, 03:57 PM
  #42  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In general, people renting vacation apartments collect hotel tax. Who knows if they really forward those taxes to the govt. or pocket it.

But I've seen on the same site some listings saying the prices include VAT and others saying they don't include VAT (of 17.5%).
scrb is offline  
Old Apr 14th, 2006, 05:24 PM
  #43  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72,790
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 7 Posts
scrb - you are wrong. E&E which I recommended, Hamlet.uk and Scala House which Lori recommended - none of those add VAT on top. And most other properties/agencies I've used haven't either. VAT is usually included in the flat rental.

janisj is offline  
Old Apr 14th, 2006, 05:48 PM
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VAT is included in Scala House prices as well as Hamlet. Perhaps if you deal with a private individual it is different but since we never do that I can't be sure about that. Scala House is large - it's a 9 story bldg. with 4 apts. on each floor and 2 on the top floor. Hamlet's owners own quite a few apts in that complex. These are business operations.
Lori is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 03:53 AM
  #45  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curious - I've never seen this phrase "sticker shock" before today (and now I've seen it twice, although possibly from the same poster) - where does that come from ?
caroline_edinburgh is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 03:58 AM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's what happens when you like the car but then look at what it says on the price sticker in the windscreen.

And if you don't get sticker shock, you'll get buyer remorse when you discover everyone else paid half what you did.

Salesmen have rarely enriched the language. Though BOGOFs and twofers did a bit.
CotswoldScouser is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 04:11 AM
  #47  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36,791
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
I haven't read all the posts so maybe this was already mentioned.
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/vac...mmodation.html

Some of these are studios while others are rooms with private baths and you have access to the cafeteria for breakfast or a kitchen on the floor. I was surprised how nice many were for the price. Most are available July and August only.
kybourbon is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 04:28 AM
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks flanner - must be just my ignorance then, due to never having had a car
caroline_edinburgh is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 04:52 AM
  #49  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Caroline: It's not only cars.

Boots make it very difficult to know the price of a pair of glasses until the salesman's had a chance to spell it, tell it and sell it. That's to avoid the sticker shock you'd have if they showed the price clearly.

Buy them, then find out what LensCrafters charge for the same glasses in the US and you get a mnear-fatal attack of buyer remorse.

Shopping is seriously damaging to your health.
CotswoldScouser is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 04:56 AM
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V. true about Boots opticians, flanner. I get my disposable contact lenses from there & following my last eye test, considered replacing my ancient glasses. I found a frame I liked which was actually half price & quite reasonable, but it ended up seeming impossible to get a pair of glasses for less than £300 !! (My last ones were 2 for about £80 I think ) So I didn't bother.
caroline_edinburgh is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 05:34 AM
  #51  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was away for the long bank holiday weekend so i did not have an opportunity to enter this debate.

>>>>>
Which "urban" areas grew together to make London?
>>>>>

easy...for starters, the city of london and the city of westminster, as well as dozens of other SEPARATELY administered entities. There is a metropolitan police force that covers the area that is commonly known as "London" but other than that there is little in the way of government in common with the whole of what is known as london. the current structure that includes the mayor was formed around 2000 for the purpose of promoting "london" and solving london-wide problems. most government services are within the realm of the borough (e.g. camden, westminster, etc). so the assertion that:

>>>>>
This describes the evolution of most major metropolitan areas.
>>>>>

is inaccurate and ignores the fact that london is a collection of separate entities that is much different from most cities. therefore, i see why ness has compared it to LA. As far as i know, the area called "LA" is also comprised of separate cities or towns that are commonly known as "LA". many important things are not within LA proper but within these separate cities and towns that are within LA county.

the main difference that i see is that LA proper (LA city limits) perhaps has more of an influence in what is commonly referred to as "LA". there is little or no notion of "london proper". however, enough of LA's significant "things" are located in separately administered cities that the comparasin with london is not inappropriate.
walkinaround is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 06:15 AM
  #52  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've stayed at a couple of the Citadines properties - both in what I considered handy locations near tube stops, grocery stores and walkable to many sites interesting to tourists.

www.citadines.com
SallyCanuck is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 09:44 AM
  #53  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I found a couple of hotels near Holborn for around 72 pounds a night.

I was hoping to be east of Hyde Park but I tried Kensington on Priceline and I ended up with Hilton Olympia way out near Hammersmith for $70 a night.

I could have afforded more but I guess for a savings of at least $75 a night, I could take longer subway rides in.

Now to figure out how to get on the line to Piccadilly Circus from Kensington High Street. Closest tube stations are Olympia and Kensington High Street according to the Hilton site.
scrb is offline  
Old Apr 18th, 2006, 10:33 PM
  #54  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Different people have different perceptions of what is central, based on their experience and interests. To me Holborn would be much more central and convenient than Kensington which a lot of visitors seem to favour.
caroline_edinburgh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scurry
Europe
14
May 26th, 2015 07:49 AM
kira23
Europe
25
Aug 14th, 2009 08:27 AM
kdm
Europe
13
Sep 29th, 2006 06:53 AM
JesseSlome
Europe
4
Feb 11th, 2006 07:25 AM
MelissaBeckoff
Europe
6
Jan 17th, 2006 04:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -