Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Trying to mentally gauge the size of Italy!

Trying to mentally gauge the size of Italy!

Jan 21st, 2007, 01:07 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,559
Trying to mentally gauge the size of Italy!

I am trying to get a feel for how big Italy is. Would traveling in Italy be generally comparable in size to traveling in California? My Nat'l Geographic atlas has different scales for USA and Europe.

vivi is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 01:23 PM
  #2  
rhapsody
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In my atlases, both are the size of my forefinger. Wait, you are right, the scales are different

Seriously, italia is roughly as big as arizona.
 
Jan 21st, 2007, 01:23 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Italy = 116,000 square miles
California = 163,707
Arizona = 114,006

or the equivalent of two of Georgia or Illinois

http://www.enchantedlearning.com/usa/states/area.shtml

(Ain't Google grand?)

starrsville is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 01:29 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
California is slightly "longer" and a bit "wider". Total land are is about 156,000 square miles for CA, and 115,000 for Italy.

And CA is basically one big piece of land, while Italy has two very large islands - Sicily and Saridinia.

When you travel, land area and size aren't the only thing. For example, Italy has some highspeed rail (Florence-Rome-Naples and Milan-Turin). California has none. And the sizes of cities are very different. You can spend a couple of hours driving and still in the LA Metropolitan. In Italy, a few miles can bring you from one important historical town to another one.

Roads are different too. Speed on the autostrada can be a little higher than on the interstate, but no significant difference. But once you get on the smaller roads, your speed can drop trememdously because they often go through towns, and can be narrow.

And you can take trains and buses to virtually any town. Public transportation is much more spotty in California.

So, area and distance is only one part in planning travel.
rkkwan is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 01:37 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 118
rhapsody and starrsville give you good answers when comparing Italy to Arizona; at least according to the CIA Worldfactbook (https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications...k/geos/it.html).
capkirk1 is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 02:57 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,433
vivi; I don't recall the exact question but I once posted something like this with the train schedules.

Watch the sunrise over Mt. Vesuvius in Naples.

Train to Rome, hop on the metro, walk thru the Roman Forum and around the Colosseum, metro back to station.

Train to Florence, walk over and see Michangelo's David with a reserved ticket and walk back to station.

Train to Venice, walk from the station to Piazza San Marco, enjoy a nice dinner and watch the sunset over drinks.
Regards, Walter
ParadiseLost is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 02:59 PM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,559
Thanks for the replies. I had looked up the square mileage in the atlases, I guess I was just trying to put Italian travel into the context of the extensive travel I done in CA as Italy and CA seem like they are shaped the same. I don't know why I am stymied about planning my trip to Italy ( my 5th trip to Europe.) I have several good guidebooks, Streetwise maps, and I have read a lot on various travel sites. But for some reason I have a mental roadblock when it comes to Italy! Maybe becuase it is so diverse--beaches, alps, ruins, churches, hill towns, canals...
vivi is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 03:16 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
It's basically meaningless to compare Italy to Arizona in terms of travel. Shape is different, geography is different, population is vastly different (Italy has more than 10x the population), amount of stuff to see is different, transportation can't be any more different...

So, when you're planning travel, stop thinking about size. It's so irrelevant, unless you're just driving and doing nothing else.
rkkwan is offline  
Jan 21st, 2007, 04:16 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 538
I did a mapquest.com search on directions in Italy for Venice to Naples - the distance is 455 miles, 6 hrs. 16 mins., pretty much autostrada the whole way. I can't remember the source but I seem to remember reading that Italy is about 600 miles long. From my perspective that would be like driving from Atlanta, GA to Washington, DC, depending on stops and speed, about 10-11 hrs.
toni_g_b is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jake1
Europe
19
Aug 5th, 2008 06:29 AM
sarge56
Europe
73
Oct 9th, 2007 11:17 AM
didi
Europe
7
May 8th, 2006 05:28 AM
dcappolino
Europe
10
Jun 1st, 2005 02:52 PM
jmb67
Europe
33
Nov 25th, 2003 06:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:49 PM.