| Rex |
May 13th, 2000 09:44 AM |
I may be biased in favor of the advantages of having a car, but I cannot believe that the Orvieto option is the best choice. <BR> <BR>I favor one of two extremes: <BR> <BR>1. Don't start your rental in Florence. Use the train to get to Rome. Yes, that means loss of the flexibility to see the Tuscan countryside - - but you have the return trip northbound. Rent upon leaving Rome. Getting OUT of Rome is the least challenging aspect of driving there (though even this can be a "headache", as you call it). and allow an extra day (or 2 or 3 or more?) to stop along the way - - in Assisi, in Tuscany, in Verona, etc, etc. <BR> <BR>or <BR> <BR>2. If you want the sheer fun of having a car, go ahead and rent in Florence, and fear not taking your car into Rome. Yes, you may find that it takes FOREVER to make your way into Il Centro Storico. But you know - - it's only time. You CAN drive your car right up to the front door of virtually any hotel in Rome, unload your stuff and carry straight into your room (instead of schlepping from train to taxi, etc, etc) and then go park your car. You may get yelled it a little bit about "you can't stop and unload here" - - but the truth is, yes you can. No one will come arrest you and throw you in jail. You just need a combination of those priceless Italian shrugs of the shoulders, and trying to act since when you say "we're hurrying, we're hurrying" (si, si, andiamo pronto, capisco, pronto, pronto). The place you have to park your car may be 200, 400, even 800 meters away and you'll simply have to walk back to your hotel. The parking will be expensive, and in all probability, there will be no reason for you to touch your car during your 3 days in Rome. But you CAN do it.
|