South of Italy vs North of Italy
Feb 1st, 2012, 01:54 PM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
South of Italy vs North of Italy
Can anyone give feedback on whether or not visiting the south of Italy is better than visiting the Amalfi Coast? Or is that even a good idea to add a Southern City in the same trip as Northern Italy? For instance fly into Sicaly, visit the black sand beaches in Palermo then head up North to Venice, Florence, and end in Rome? (16 total days including travel?)
Feb 1st, 2012, 01:58 PM
#2
i think we need a little more information, Mirta.
what time of year, who's travelling [ie size of party, composition] what do you like to see/do, where travelling from and to, what you have already booked, if anything, etc. etc.
what time of year, who's travelling [ie size of party, composition] what do you like to see/do, where travelling from and to, what you have already booked, if anything, etc. etc.
Feb 1st, 2012, 04:40 PM
#6
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In March there really isn't any place in europe that has beach weather - it's a temperate climate - not a semi-tropical one like FL.
And you are trying to stuff too much into too few days. It re4ally doesn;t make sense to go to Sicily for less than 5 days or so.
If you want beach weather = go in early May in the south and late May of June farther north.
And you are trying to stuff too much into too few days. It re4ally doesn;t make sense to go to Sicily for less than 5 days or so.
If you want beach weather = go in early May in the south and late May of June farther north.
