| flanneruk |
Mar 9th, 2005 10:02 PM |
No, of course London isn't less crowded in September (presumably you mean than July or August).
London half-empties in August. You can get a seat on the Tube, the roads are devoid of traffic, and you can eat at fashionable restaurants without a year's notice. Taxis are available easily, even when it's raining. On the other hand, theatres are at their dullest (who's going to waste original material on a bunch of tourists?), there are virtually no interesting art exhibitions and the recent boom in public lectures and debates goes on holiday like practically everyone else. And it rarely rains.
Touristy things and places may get fuller in August, though. Impossible to understand why: our weather's at its worst in August (London isn't designed for global warming summers), our life is at its most boring, and the parks look horribly parched. We get surprisingly little rain in Britain and have few lakes to hold rainfall: what rain we get flows quickly through our short rivers into the North Sea. So it's environmentally unacceptable to water public greenery artificially in midsummer.
All changes when we all come back from our holidays in early September and the weather breaks (traditionally throughout the late August holiday weekend). London reverts to its usual crowded, interesting, climatically tolerable and green self. I doubt hotel prices come down much: London also reverts to its role as Europe's commercial capital, so what the hotels lose in Japanese matrons they gain in Frankfurt bankers. But those Frankfurt bankers don't go to the Tower of London, so many of the tourist honey pots empty out.
Getting into restaurants or interesting plays and operas starts getting tough again - and stays that way till the end of June. The Tube goes back to its usual state of overcrowding. But no doubt the audience at the Changing of the Guard thins out.
|