Mandatory fly suits, secure shoes and regulation luggage?
Nov 22nd, 2004, 08:21 AM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mandatory fly suits, secure shoes and regulation luggage?
What would you think about standardized air flight attire - something like long-johns, that everyone would have to wear under their clother in order to fly commercially? Airline security are now interested in being able to see the "contours" of a persons body to determin if they are packing heat. What about standardized carry on luggage i.e. same for everyone and all checked baggage be flown seperately on planes designated for the purpose? Would it mean shorter lines and more security?
Nov 22nd, 2004, 08:32 AM
#2
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Possible Problem: having the TSA SEE my amazing contours in close detail may cause mass inspector defections.
However, I'm not opposed to the Laker Girls flying nude in order to promote greater flight safety.
However, I'm not opposed to the Laker Girls flying nude in order to promote greater flight safety.
Nov 22nd, 2004, 08:41 AM
#4
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shortly after 9/11 when the Administration was grappling with the security situation the Sec of Transportation proposed that all passengers flying be "wanded" before being allowed to board.
The airlines, particularly the then CEO of Delta, were vociferously against such a policy and the general "objection" was "the flying public wouldn't stand for it."
Personally, I think they probably would have but the airlines have been wrong before on issues, especially ones they (make that us) are supposedly "paying for."
Nice idea, yours, but I doubt it would be allowed to work.
The airlines, particularly the then CEO of Delta, were vociferously against such a policy and the general "objection" was "the flying public wouldn't stand for it."
Personally, I think they probably would have but the airlines have been wrong before on issues, especially ones they (make that us) are supposedly "paying for."
Nice idea, yours, but I doubt it would be allowed to work.
Nov 22nd, 2004, 09:56 AM
#8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Calamari,
With the proper 'flysuit' design, tailored with lots of girdling and handstraps to squeeze flesh in and keep arms off the armrests, the airline industry could effectively reduce seat width and add in perhaps one or two additional seats per row. Of course, heavy coats and/or outerwear would be banned.
And, as a bonus, security queues would be shorter because all the bodies would be individually compacted. Flysuits would be issued at check-in and required apparel for passing through security.
Brilliant idea. Quite efficient. Perhaps the ticket price could vary by flysuit size.
- Sharon
With the proper 'flysuit' design, tailored with lots of girdling and handstraps to squeeze flesh in and keep arms off the armrests, the airline industry could effectively reduce seat width and add in perhaps one or two additional seats per row. Of course, heavy coats and/or outerwear would be banned.
And, as a bonus, security queues would be shorter because all the bodies would be individually compacted. Flysuits would be issued at check-in and required apparel for passing through security.
Brilliant idea. Quite efficient. Perhaps the ticket price could vary by flysuit size.
- Sharon
Nov 22nd, 2004, 10:11 AM
#9
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just flew to IND from DCA on Thursday and the security line went the full length of the terminal. The TSA had just started the "body contour" thing, but no one knew that they had to disrobe until they were at the security portal. The undressing took forever.
I expected that they would just ask people to take off baggy sweaters or suit jackets, but they asked me to remove the very sleek, fitted cardigan I was wearing. I had to go through in the tank top of my twin set. I didn't really mind, except I hadn't shaved my armpits that day
Soon, all the TSA people will quit- between the unappetizing-looking disrobed people, the foot odor and the grouchy types who are still surprised that the security is meant for everyone and they aren't exempt.
I was surprised at how far they had people strip down. A guy in front of me had to go through in a wife-beater undershirt (he was quite buff so it was okay.)
In the future, I will create my own "fly suit" of easy-to-remove layers, just like I now wear slip off shoes on flights. Sort of like the layer I wear when I go shopping somewhere like Loehman's with a communal dressing room.
Maybe m_kingdom will have some advice for us on the right catsuit look for winter???
I expected that they would just ask people to take off baggy sweaters or suit jackets, but they asked me to remove the very sleek, fitted cardigan I was wearing. I had to go through in the tank top of my twin set. I didn't really mind, except I hadn't shaved my armpits that day
Soon, all the TSA people will quit- between the unappetizing-looking disrobed people, the foot odor and the grouchy types who are still surprised that the security is meant for everyone and they aren't exempt.
I was surprised at how far they had people strip down. A guy in front of me had to go through in a wife-beater undershirt (he was quite buff so it was okay.)
In the future, I will create my own "fly suit" of easy-to-remove layers, just like I now wear slip off shoes on flights. Sort of like the layer I wear when I go shopping somewhere like Loehman's with a communal dressing room.
Maybe m_kingdom will have some advice for us on the right catsuit look for winter???
Nov 22nd, 2004, 10:15 AM
#10
Crikey, great idea. And what about SleePods(c)? Your own tubular lie-flat bed, akin to those Japanese hotel thingys. Stacked two or three high, you could probably fit as many into a 757 as seats in a 777, plus the empty ones could be filled with cargo or traveling pets, thereby making more room in the hold for "business class" baggage. Everybody gets personal IFE, and you'll never be bothered by your seatmate's nattering. Loo breaks and meal times might be a tad more awkward than currently the case, unless you pop for the PodPal(c) in-flight amenity kit, which contains a bag of pretzels, a bottle of water (booze $10 extra) and the Pod-a-Loo Pak(c) personal relief suite.
PremiumPod(c) class passengers get tanning lamps built in, so that when they arrive in Malaga they'll look like they live there.
I can see it now. "How was your flight Mr. Smith?"
"Tubular."
PremiumPod(c) class passengers get tanning lamps built in, so that when they arrive in Malaga they'll look like they live there.
I can see it now. "How was your flight Mr. Smith?"
"Tubular."
Nov 22nd, 2004, 10:30 AM
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Degas, you never fail to entertain, but I thought for sure the "packing heat" thing would get more of a response from you darling.
Would it be capitalizing on fear or simply meeting a need if designers came up with chic flight suites with mathcing carry-on and shoes?
Would it be capitalizing on fear or simply meeting a need if designers came up with chic flight suites with mathcing carry-on and shoes?
Nov 22nd, 2004, 10:37 AM
#14
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL Gardyloo!
I actually think the pods would be more comfortable, but the bucky neck pillow people would be out of business.
Perhaps they could make an absorbent undergarment out of natural buckwheat to solve the potty problem?
I actually think the pods would be more comfortable, but the bucky neck pillow people would be out of business.
Perhaps they could make an absorbent undergarment out of natural buckwheat to solve the potty problem?
Nov 22nd, 2004, 10:39 AM
#15
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes. Yes. That's the ticket. The carry-on could be purchased pre-packed in ladies or mens with a complete set of one size fits all ready-to-wear travel apparel. Perfect solution to put an end to the big question and debate of whether or not to wear the lime green leisure suite and would also eliminate the fear of seeing too many white sneakers.
- Sharon
- Sharon
Nov 22nd, 2004, 11:49 AM
#19
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder how the lines will be affected with the most recent guidelines allowing private contractors to take over TSA functions again,,,,,,
why is it that we need to take off our buckles and shoes and all, correct me if im so wrong, but i havent noticed such paranoid security in major airports like paris, rome, madrid....
why is it that we need to take off our buckles and shoes and all, correct me if im so wrong, but i havent noticed such paranoid security in major airports like paris, rome, madrid....
Nov 22nd, 2004, 12:20 PM
#20
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why is it that we need to take off our buckles and shoes and all, correct me if im so wrong, but i havent noticed such paranoid security in major airports like paris, rome, madrid....
Have you not been paying attention to world events and the attempted shoe bombing?
Have you not been paying attention to world events and the attempted shoe bombing?
