London - Travel Inn Putney Bridge
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
London - Travel Inn Putney Bridge
Have read good reports on this hotel in Budget Travel. Any comments? Does anyone know what the neighborhood is like? Any nearby restaurants, grocery, pubs, etc.?
#2
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Charmick - I notice you have posted this same question under a separate post.
Rather than getting several posts going, you can check on the status of a post by clicking on your screen name - this will bring up all the posts you contribute to. And if you want to keep a post near the top of the list, you can just reply to it by typing in "to the top" or "topping" or "ttt" and it will move up in the list on the lh side.
Rather than getting several posts going, you can check on the status of a post by clicking on your screen name - this will bring up all the posts you contribute to. And if you want to keep a post near the top of the list, you can just reply to it by typing in "to the top" or "topping" or "ttt" and it will move up in the list on the lh side.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree - you really only need to post once . . . .
re the Travel Inn - a Travel Inn is a Travel Inn - they are all pretty much the same. The only real differences being the locations. This is certainly an OK neighborhood -- but it is pretty far from any tourist sites. You would have to depend on the District line to get most places - for many first timers the District line seems to confuse folks. I'd guess that is because it has spurs that go off in several directions. But if you get to know the line it is pretty straight forward.
If you can get in, the County Hall Travel Inn would be the one to book -- right in the very middle of London across from Big Ben and next door to the Eye.
re the Travel Inn - a Travel Inn is a Travel Inn - they are all pretty much the same. The only real differences being the locations. This is certainly an OK neighborhood -- but it is pretty far from any tourist sites. You would have to depend on the District line to get most places - for many first timers the District line seems to confuse folks. I'd guess that is because it has spurs that go off in several directions. But if you get to know the line it is pretty straight forward.
If you can get in, the County Hall Travel Inn would be the one to book -- right in the very middle of London across from Big Ben and next door to the Eye.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Putney isn't central, it might be cheap, but it's not a place tourists should consider staying if they want to see London. You'll soon lose your savings on the rate by increased transporation costs. Forget it, start again.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
m_kingdom - you forget most of us mere mortals travel mostly by bus or tube. The Putney Br. Travel Inn is in zone 2 so the extra cost would really be minimal. However - the extra time needed to get places would be a problem.
#11
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The tube is vile, the other day I had an engagement in The City, I couldn't be bothered driving, it was lovely sunny weather, so I walked from Mayfair to my engagement. It took under and hour, and you see so much more when you're on foot.
#12
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But there's a big difference in the way a Londoner travels around London and the way a tourist travels around town. A Londoner would most likely have one destination in mind (work, the theatre, etc...) Walking or taking a taxi may well be the preferred method of travel.
But tourists generally have a whole day of getting around the city planned. Most tourists are on their feet from the time they leave their hotel in the morning until they collapse from exhaustion in the evening. Walking between all the sites in London is highly impractical. Public transportation is necessary, although I prefer the buses to the tube for the very reason that you see a lot more on a bus then underground on the tube.
But tourists generally have a whole day of getting around the city planned. Most tourists are on their feet from the time they leave their hotel in the morning until they collapse from exhaustion in the evening. Walking between all the sites in London is highly impractical. Public transportation is necessary, although I prefer the buses to the tube for the very reason that you see a lot more on a bus then underground on the tube.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mambo5
Europe
7
Jul 17th, 2006 11:43 AM