Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Do you feel safer when flying a foreing airline??

Do you feel safer when flying a foreing airline??

Jul 14th, 2004, 01:51 PM
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,563
NO. American airlines have more security precautions than any other except El Al. I'd never trust Air France or Olympic or Iberia or Alitalia or AerLingus over a US airline on a transatlantic flight to or from the US. Others may have equal security.

Have you people forgotten that Air France flights to the US were prevented from leaving Paris late last year because they were potential terrorist targets and the security at CDG was poor?
BigRuss is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 03:31 PM
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,995
For those who are afraid of USAirways: they recently joined Star Alliance, which includes Lufthansa and many other "foreign" airlines. With code sharing, etc., I think it could be very murky as to what constitutes USAirways flight vs European carrier.
grandmere is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 03:37 PM
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
When I play golf I go a-"foreing".

And when my people hunt and gather we go a-foraging!!



Beatchick is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 03:50 PM
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,473
...and depending on how good your stroke is, you may go "foraging" for your golf balls.
Jocelyn_P is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 04:27 PM
  #45  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
Jocelyn, good one!

As Johnny Carson would say:
HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
Beatchick is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 04:42 PM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,106
I fly whichever airline gives me the best schedule, price, seat selection, and, last consideration, service. Foreign or domestic makes no difference.

Oh, yes, only the name airlines if it is a foreign airline. A lot of the domestic airlines in Asia, Africa, and South America are puddlehoppers with crazy schedules and even crazier pilots! Not to mention the terrible stuff that passes for "food"...
easytraveler is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 04:56 PM
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,098
Some airlines are obviously less likely to be targeted by terrorists than others, so if you're playing the odds you would go for one of those. But, either way, the odds of your particular flight being targeted by terriorists is pretty small.
RufusTFirefly is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 08:17 PM
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 373
The Air France and British Air flights that were cancelled or delayed last year came from information provided by the U.S. government that later turned out to be a case of mistaken identity. Politicians are right. We do have short memories.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,107239,00.html
usbeauty is offline  
Jul 14th, 2004, 08:37 PM
  #49  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,922
As for safety records, Qantas, the second-oldest airline in the world after KLM, has never had a fatality in 84 years of operation. Should that make me feel safer with them, or worry that their turn must be due soon?
Neil_Oz is offline  
Jul 15th, 2004, 01:25 AM
  #50  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 380
A couple posters stated that they would choose Air France over an american carrier in order to reduce the risks of hijacking, but I don't think it's sounds. Air-France planes have been hijacked in the past, including by islamists. There has been islamist terrorist attacks in France. In particular, Algerian islamists have a grudge against France, due to the support given by the french government to the Algerian one. So, if one wants to avoid being tagetted by terrorists, Air France isn't a particularily good choice.

Both the UK and Italy are present in Irak, so British Airways and Alitalia aren't safe bets, either. One could probably find a country whose airlines are less likely to be targetted (say Lufthansa), but it wouldn't be an absolute guarantee (a plane could be targetted just because it's leaving/ heading to the USA, for instance).

Given that the likehood of a hijacking is already extremely low, and that the risk is non-zero regardless of the company you choose, I don't think that the supposed lower risk is worth the inconvenience of having to fly only on a limited number of carriers.

Besides, anyway, the risk of getting killed in your car while going to the airport is vastly higher than the risk of ending in a hijacked flight. Still people are affraid of the second and don't care about the first.

So, such a choice doesn't seem rationnal to me. Note that I can understand an irrationnal fear. I, for one, am affraid of flying on *any* plane, and terrorism has nothing to do with it. So, I wouldn't cast stones from my glass house if someone has such fears, but I still don't think that choosing Air France over United Airlines should be presented as a rationnal choice.


clairobscur is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:56 AM.