Day trip suggestion from London

Old Mar 10th, 2016, 10:56 PM
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"even in the Cotswolds, if you leave the "Quintessentials", not even far, one is again alone."

Even at lunchtime on the fairest Easter bank holiday, even starting just 150 yards of central Burford or Bibury, we rarely meet more than one or two other people in a four hour walk.

The nonsense about the crowded Cotswolds is a delusion peddled by people too lazy and incurious to venture even a yard away from the charabancs they were trucked in on.

The paths are (almost) used only by those who live here. And since the area's charm - ultimately - stems from its staggeringly low population density, I have those paths virtually as an exclusive domain for me and my dogs
flanneruk is offline  
Old Mar 10th, 2016, 11:09 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,159
Received 25 Likes on 3 Posts
It certainly doesn't have to take "6 or 7 hours". It looks fine and you can stop where you like for as long as you like, needn't linger for hours. Many people love Warwick Castle. I don't and, if it's a nice walk you're looking for, there are thousands of great ones, literally everywhere. But if that one appeals to you, it'll take as long as you want it to.

If you find it taking longer than you want, or decide to spend your time visiting places along the way, you can always cut the walking short by taking a quicker route. I do it all the time. Just have a better map with you than the little one in the description, like the Streetmap version or buy the "suggested map" if you like maps.
MmePerdu is online now  
Old Mar 11th, 2016, 09:31 AM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 67,392
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 7 Posts
>>It certainly doesn't have to take "6 or 7 hours".walk doesn't take 6 or 7 hours. It will take 2 hours at a reasonable speed. But it does not include visiting Warwick Castle or anything IN the town. So thinking one would travel all the way from London to walk 2 hours and miss everything else doesn't seem reasonable. If one is planning this as a day trip -- then 6 or 7 hours 'on the ground' is about right.

And IF one isn't interested in exploring Warwick/the Castle and is going only for this walk . . . there are hundreds of other/better 2 hour walks a lot nearer to London than Warwick.
janisj is online now  
Old Mar 11th, 2016, 10:26 AM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,159
Received 25 Likes on 3 Posts
My point was to consider, as you plan for a walk, whether walking in a beautiful place is your priority, or is walking in Warwick in particular, or in a place where you can stop in to visit something, important to you. Deciding on an emphasis, and how long you'd like to spend doing it, will make all the difference in your choice of place.
MmePerdu is online now  
Related Topics
Original Poster
Last Post
Oct 30th, 2016 09:55 PM
Sep 25th, 2004 08:21 AM
Feb 5th, 2003 10:16 PM
Linda X
Oct 20th, 2002 02:18 PM
Jun 25th, 2002 10:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM.