Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   Europe (https://www.fodors.com/community/europe/)
-   -   An Ettiquet Question. (https://www.fodors.com/community/europe/an-ettiquet-question-494011/)

ira Jan 9th, 2005 02:21 PM

An Ettiquet Question.
 
Hi all,

If posting in caps is considered shouting, is posting in < B >bold< /B > OK?

ira Jan 9th, 2005 02:22 PM

.... is posting in <b>bold</b> OK?

ira Jan 9th, 2005 02:23 PM

<b>what if the whole message is in bold?</b>

m_kingdom2 Jan 9th, 2005 02:23 PM

Ira dear, it helps if you can spell it correctly, please, have some ettiquette.

ira Jan 9th, 2005 02:24 PM

<b><i>How about bold Italics?</i></b>

ira Jan 9th, 2005 02:26 PM

Hey m_k,

<b><i>If I hadn't had two Martinis, would I be posting this at all?</i></b> :)

111op Jan 9th, 2005 02:28 PM

I think bold is in, and ettiquet is really out, and m_k and dear <i> are, well, so </i> last year <i> <b>, like Dries van Noten castoffs.
</b></i>

elaine Jan 9th, 2005 02:36 PM

the 'dear' is deliberate, it helps to convey the attitude of condescension

ira Jan 9th, 2005 02:41 PM

&gt;..the 'dear' is deliberate, it helps to convey the attitude of condescension&lt;

&quot;Once upon a time, when Uncle was very young&quot;, one said Dear Sir or Dear Madam to provide a certain aura of respect to an otherwise unpleasant statement, in order to ward off the possibility of being horsewhipped. :)

cmt Jan 9th, 2005 02:51 PM

Miles Kingdom: When you choose to correct someone else's spelling, proper etiquette requires that you at least get it right yourself: etiquette, etiquette, etiquette.

&lt;&lt;Author: m_kingdom2
Date: 01/09/2005, 06:23 pm
Message: Ira dear, it helps if you can spell it correctly, please, have some ettiquette.&gt;&gt;



janeg Jan 9th, 2005 02:54 PM

Ah ha! I thought there were a few too many &quot;t's&quot; running around out there. But please explain to the country mouse here, what are Dries van Noten castoffs.

maitaitom Jan 9th, 2005 02:58 PM

&quot;f I hadn't had two Martinis, would I be posting this at all?&quot;

Damn, Ira, you're already two ahead of me. Of course, being in California I can catch up.
((H))

janeg Jan 9th, 2005 02:59 PM

Nevermind, I googled. Whoo Whoo. I shall stick with my Liz's &amp; Land's End. Thought I think I would accept Dries van Noten castoffs. Do they come in size 14? 8-|

elaine Jan 9th, 2005 03:12 PM

ira, I guess it's like saying &quot;with all due respect&quot; when you're about to say something disrespectful
=:)

ira Jan 9th, 2005 03:18 PM

&gt;... what are Dries van Noten castoffs?&lt;

Certain snakes, crabs and bugs grow by shedding their outer cartilage. These are known as &quot;castoffs&quot;.

Certain persons (usually, but not restricted to, prepubescent female persons), unable to determine who or what they are may become overly impressed by current fashions and attempt to imitate what was once known as &quot;the In Crowd&quot; (I'm in with the In Crowd).

Particularly susceptible persons (they know who they are), in both the American and European continents, have taken to wearing clothing made from the recent castoffs of the van Noten (a particularly unpleasant sort of reptile).

The goods therefrom dry out and fall apart in one season.

The poster simply made a typo. The intended phrase was &quot;Dried van Noten castoffs&quot;.

dcespedes Jan 9th, 2005 03:33 PM

Ira, don't drink and scribe ;) ...what a funny thread :-)

cigalechanta Jan 9th, 2005 03:39 PM

I love all my Dries Van Noten Clothes and wish I could afford more, even the vintage.
I love my gap jeans as well. Everyone has their own taste we and should not be judged by it unless you are Hannibal Lector :)

Patrick Jan 9th, 2005 03:40 PM

I had to check out this thread. I was sure that your &quot;Ettiquet Question&quot; was how to spell it.

elaine Jan 9th, 2005 04:18 PM

just rereading, and fear in my last posting I wasn't clear about 'dear', I was referring to your funny quote about
'Dear Madam&quot;

AnselmAdorne Jan 9th, 2005 04:28 PM

<i>&quot;If I hadn't had two Martinis, would I be posting this at all?&quot;</i>

Ira, back in the fifities (yes, I was alive then) Wayne and Shuster had a sketch called <i>Rinse the Blood Off My Toga,</i> which was about the assination of Julius Caesar. Wayne, playing the detective Flavius Maximus (a role model for Falco?) goes into a bar and says, &quot;Gimme a martinus.&quot; The bar tender says, &quot;Don't you mean martinis?&quot; And Wayne replies, &quot;If I want two I'll ask for them!&quot;

Anselm

Scarlett Jan 9th, 2005 04:33 PM

Ira, honey :) I think <b>bold</b> makes it seem as if you are thumping your fist on the table, or at least speaking a tiny bit louder to get that point across.
Italics are nice, they just sort of say it <i>softly &amp; gently </i>
As for etiquette, on these boards, if one manages not to call someone naff, daft, a troll, or a moron, you are being very mannerly.

elaine Jan 9th, 2005 04:37 PM

Scarlett or ira dears :-D

Is underlining possible around here?

Robespierre Jan 9th, 2005 04:42 PM

Sure. Like this: &lt;u&gt;the text you want underlined&lt;/u&gt;

elaine Jan 9th, 2005 04:44 PM

<u>like this</u>

thanks!

cigalechanta Jan 9th, 2005 04:47 PM

<u> thanks Robespierre</u>

Scarlett Jan 9th, 2005 04:57 PM

That is <b>SO</b> <u>Cool!!!</u>
<i>Thanks Robespierre!</i>

tedgale Jan 9th, 2005 06:02 PM

Anslem, re the above, do you remember:

&quot;I begged him, &quot;Julie, DON'T GO!!&quot;

(You have to be Canadian and middle-aged to &quot;get&quot; this)


Christina Jan 9th, 2005 06:26 PM

I find an all caps post just a little difficult to read because of the way we are used to reading type -- however, I don't go ballistic over it the way some folks do and wouldn't ever tell somebody off about it. For both caps and bold, I think the idea is they are fine if the idea is for emphasis, but not the entire post. I much prefer caps or bold to that internet convention of putting stars around words. I'm not going to post in bold or itelaics because I don't want to spend the time making those extra characters.

cmt Jan 9th, 2005 06:29 PM

&lt;&lt;I much prefer caps or bold to that internet convention of putting stars around words&gt;&gt;

I agree with that. I find that odd practice of using the asterisk before and after a word for emphasis, like this, *so* distracting and artificial.

Scarlett Jan 9th, 2005 06:49 PM

I have noticed those ** being used a &quot;kisses&quot; in some postings.
I really don't mind any of it. As long as I can read it, and it is cordial, I am content ~ sorry .

Robespierre Jan 9th, 2005 07:02 PM

Ancient History (circa 1980)

BOYS AND GIRLS, ONCE UPON A TIME COMPUTERS DIDN'T HAVE LOWER CASE. FOR EMPHASIS, WE USED *ASTERISKS* BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE ITALICS. WE WOULD UNDERLINE LIKE _THIS_.

I think some people continue the use of these conventions out of habit.

cmt Jan 9th, 2005 07:16 PM

No wonder it looks so alien to me. I took my first few tentative steps on the Internet in 1998 and didn't get a computer until 2000. I don't dislike all caps as much as I dislike the use of *asterisks* and _these things_ for emphasis. They remind me of the cutesie 1970s fad of pantomiming quotation marks in a conversation to mean &quot;quote.&quot;

crefloors Jan 9th, 2005 10:27 PM

tedgael: &quot;JULIE don't go&quot;!!!! LOL Well you might be right about the middle aged part but I'm not Canadian. Hadn't thought of that in years!!!! Too funny.

ira Jan 10th, 2005 05:38 AM

&gt;Ancient History (circa 1980)

&gt;...ONCE UPON A TIME COMPUTERS DIDN'T HAVE LOWER CASE.&lt;

Gee, I was introduced to my first computer (IBM 350) in 1961. It had both upper and lower case and could underline. No bold or Italics, though, on the printer.

AnselmAdorne Jan 10th, 2005 05:57 AM

tedgale, being Canadian and middle-aged (is that what this is called? I just took down my outdoor Christmas lights this morning and discovered some new aches and pains when I bent over to pick something up), I do remember &quot;Julie, don't go!&quot;

We didn't have a TV in the 50s, so I used to walk a block to the McLennan's, who had dazzled us all by acquiring a television. I seem to recollect Wayne and Shuster being on the Ed Sullivan Show. crefloors, is that perhaps where you might have seen them?

Anselm

Robespierre Jan 10th, 2005 06:11 AM

You were communicating on line with others in 1961?

<i><u><b>Formidable!</b></u></i>

<i>p.s.</i> The IBM 350 was a RamAc unit, not a computer. It was a component of the 305, which was. I cut my teeth on a 650, its predecessor.

tedgale Jan 10th, 2005 03:45 PM

Anselm: You mean your parents didn't by a television &quot;to watch the Coronation&quot;????

(Mine didn't either.)

But when we got one it was in Oakville and our rooftop antenna picked up signals from the US across Lake Ontario. Watched a.m. TV before school -- yippee!!

Then in December 1959, we moved to Ottawa where the TV day didn't start 'til 4 p.m. As soon as we got home from school we'd turn on the TV to warm up -- we watched the test pattern until the show started (repeats of I Love Lucy, I think)

Then Ottawa got a second English station -- no-one thought of watching the French station -- and we could watch Uncle Chichamus, of which I actually attended a taping (??) with my Grade 5 class.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 PM.