5 week Europe itinery with 2 children

Jan 26th, 2013, 07:30 PM
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
thanks for the tip we will do that instead
mase_777 is offline  
Feb 14th, 2013, 01:07 AM
  #22  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 22
Your itinerary is getting better. Planning the itinerary carefully is really important. And by the way don't forget to book your hotels or rentals early as I see you have a lot of stops. It can get quite a headache.
Emilittle is offline  
Feb 14th, 2013, 09:58 AM
  #23  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 25,218
The new itinerary is so much better. We took our kids, then 11 and 13, for 4 weeks in the late 90s, and have a similar travel style to yours. We hit London, York, Edinburgh, Paris and the Loire Valley, Interlaken, Venice, Florence, Rome and Viareggio on that trip. It was a great great trip, fondly remembered, and our kids continue to love to travel. You'll have a great time. (P.S. I wouldn't stay 4 days in Florence)
sf7307 is offline  
Feb 14th, 2013, 01:20 PM
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 75,913
Then fly back to London and get the eurorail to Paris for 6 days>

Well you could also drive to London's St Pancras International station, drop the car there and then catch Chunnel trains to Paris
PalenQ is offline  
Feb 14th, 2013, 05:08 PM
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 63,222
Driving to St Pancras from northern England is beyond daft . . .
janisj is online now  
Feb 15th, 2013, 11:53 AM
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 75,913
Driving to St Pancras from northern England is beyond daft>

why? with two kids most would rather drive and it won't takemuch longer than a train and you can drive right to St Pancras - coming by train means changing train stations once in London.

Beyond daft? Please explain why rather that just saying 'beyond daft' - why or why?
PalenQ is offline  
Feb 15th, 2013, 01:24 PM
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,313
It's beyond daft because no sane person travelling from northern England to Paris would drive down the M1 for 3, 4 or 5 hours into the centre of London, all the while dealing with busy traffic, having to pay the congestion charge, navigating their way, then haul their luggage onto on a train at St Pancras for another couple of hours, when they can quickly fly to Paris in one hour from a regional airport.

There are often better ways to travel around the UK than simply going through London when London isn't the destination. The Eurostar is quite irrelevant for those journeying to/from northern England or Scotland
sofarsogood is offline  
Feb 18th, 2013, 11:58 AM
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 37
I have been to 26 countries and Rome was by far my fave city, I would do more time there personally. The one-night stays might get taxing for your kids, but if they are good travelers, may not be a problem.
bethany1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.