1 Day in Venice - Worth It?

May 15th, 2007, 01:10 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 42
1 Day in Venice - Worth It?

My husband and I are taking a cruise this summer out of Civitavecchia. We bought our plane tickets already and we are arriving in Rome Friday morning and embark on Monday evening.

For the past 6 months, I've been planning on spending 3 days in Rome. Recently I had the bright idea to see if we could maybe squeeze a trip to Venice in. We can if we take an overnight train Saturday, get there Sunday morning, stay the night and take an early morning train on Monday to the port.

The cost is about the same since not staying in a hotel on Saturday offsets the train ticket costs.

But is it worth all the hassle for just one day in Venice? Will we be able to really enjoy it? I must say I've always dreamed of seeing Venice, but I'm afraid we'll be so exhausted from squeezing 3.5 days in Rome to 1.5, then spending a night on a train (I also don't want to get burnt out before our 12 day cruise). And this will be my hubby's first time in Europe, we don't speak Italian, and we've never been on a train. Will we be able to get ourselves there and back?

I need your expert opinions before I spend a bunch of time and effort completely replanning this portion of the trip. Thanks!
shey is offline  
May 15th, 2007, 01:24 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 52,517
hi, shey,

the short answer is No!

don't do it. There is soo much to do and see in rome, and you have so little time there anyway, to waste so much of it going back and forth to Venice seems criminal.

we had 6 days in Rome last year and barely scratched the surface.

not being rude, but if you can afford a cruise, you're likely to be back. Save Venice for another time, and give yourselves the real treat of staying put in Rome.

you'll kick yourselves if you try to squeeze in Venice this time.

regards, ann
annhig is offline  
May 15th, 2007, 01:27 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 313
I wouldn't bother. You'll barely scratch the surface of Rome in 3 days. A day in Rome can be done, but not enjoyable. It is like a tourist marathon. Rome is a wonderful city but it is also exhausting. When you are pressured to fit in all the sites in 1.5 days it is even moreso.

Enjoy the time you have in Rome and Save Venice for another trip when you'll have more time to enjoy it as well.
ripit is offline  
May 15th, 2007, 01:30 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 268
I suppose you could see Piazza San Marco and quite a few pigeons, but the best part of seeing Venice is walking the back streets and getting "lost". The thought of being under the pressure of trying to do everything in one day would defeat the purpose of the visit. You'd be better off renting a video and not going to all the effort. If you actually do go to Venice for one day, you could say you've been to Venice, but you almost certainly will not have seen Venice. Better to spend the day in Rome. See the Galleria Borghese, Trastevere, the tombs of the Popes and St. Peter's. Skip the Fontana Di Trevi, Sistine Chapel, the Roman Forum, and the Colosseum. The first two are overcrowded. The other two are boring. Three days is hardly enough to see Rome. Why rush through just to take a peek at Venice. Doesn't make sense.
nrwayne is offline  
May 15th, 2007, 01:55 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 158
i spent 4 days in rome and saw so much and i could spent another 40 days and not seen everything. it depends on what you do in rome, if you go to st peters and the vatican museum that will take one complete day, the waiting in line and going through it all.
then there is so much to see in rome.
venice is particular, one day, maybe 2 is more than enough. its different and unique. but if you want to see rome you will need more than 3 days. we spent 4 days and i mean all day from 9am to 9pm walking, taking the bus, eating, seeing the sights etc. and i still could have stayed to see more.
primobacio14204 is offline  
May 15th, 2007, 02:18 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,433
Another vote for saving Venice for another time.

You could spoil a visit to Rome by cutting the time too short, have an unsatisfactory quick look at Venice, give yourself extra trouble, and make a sizeable dent in your holiday budget.
Padraig is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 06:50 AM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Thanks everyone for your help. That's the way I was leaning but just needed confirmation that it was the right choice.
shey is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 07:06 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 75
I agree with everything said here, and would like to add that time goes by differently in Italy.
I can't exactly say that it goes by faster or slower in Italy, because it does both.
But what is certainly true is that trips to Italy work the best when you allow plenty of time. If you plan less "to do's" on your trip, you will enjoy Italy more. Tripling or even quadrupling the amount of time you would normally allot per city here in the States should give you enough room for comfort and trip "accomplishment". Italy afficionados will understand what I mean!
Have a wonderful trip!
Cheers,
Ellen
ellencraig is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 07:08 AM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,137
Plus I wouldn't rely on an Italian train to get you across the country for your cruise departure the same day. Strikes happen!
Mimar is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 07:53 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,149
Save Venice for another time.
PamSF is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 08:08 AM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 77,645
1 day, one hour, 1 minute in Venice is worth it - the world's most serenely gorgeous city.

But only in your scenario if you'll never get back to Italy again. Otherwise, like a scrumptious dessert, save it for later.
PalenQ is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 10:51 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 445
I would also suggest saving it for another trip. It's a bit of a journey even on the Eurostar. Also, once you get there, you'll be sad that you don't have more time to explore... Why not go back next year? =)
hlocke1 is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 01:44 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 62

I think it all depends upon your preference. We just got back from a trip from Rome/Florence/Venice (in one week no less!).

Venice, by far, was our favorite city. Our experience was that it was far cleaner and more "italian" (ie you feel like you're in Italy) than Rome. Rome, IMO, felt like NYC with a bunch of ruins scattered through it. I'm not a history buff so ruins were neat to see, but if you may never return back to Italy, I would *definitely* do Venice. I had a friend do a tour and he and his wife only did Venice in one day and they still thought Venice was their favorite.

I have to agree with the last poster that Venice is really a very, very special city!
gamidtown is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 01:48 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,464
You can get a very false and negative impression of Venice if you go as a "day tripper". I did it twice and although I enjoyed the experience, the city did not GRAB me the way it did others.

Last spring, I went back for 4 days (still not long enough) and was finally seduced by its charms.
OReilly is offline  
May 16th, 2007, 01:51 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 656
I love Venice and can't imagine not seeing it. However, for such a short period of time I would only do it if you are absolutely sure you will never be back again and this is your only chance to see it in your entire lifetime. Venice should be savored, not rushed through like a theme park. I would plan a second trip and make Venice the centerpiece so that you can wander and really get to know this charming city.
jdraper is offline  
May 17th, 2007, 01:47 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 66
Have to agree with everyone else. Venice is amazing but you can't do it justice in a day. It would be like taking a bite of the most magnificant piece of chocolate and not only were you restricted to one bite, but you had to spit it out without being able to digest it. Stick to to Rome and save Venice for another trip.
BigBlueMarble is offline  
May 17th, 2007, 06:35 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 77,645
Author: Henda
Date: 05/17/2007
I am furious. I have organised a trip to Europe for my boss and now he wants to return a day earlier because in half a day he's seen Venice. Can you believe it!!
PalenQ is offline  
May 17th, 2007, 06:47 AM
  #18  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,583
I always love these questions. Can you fully see and experience Venice in a day? Of course not.

Is one day in Venice better than NO days in Venice. Of course so.

We ran into my partner's dematologist and his wife and three young children in Venice two years ago. They spent a week in a villa somewhere near Lake Garda and only got to Venice for a day. Venice is all they can talk about -- their favorite part of a two week trip to Italy.

If you have longer -- stay longer, but please don't avoid going to Venice because you ONLY have one day.
NeoPatrick is offline  
May 17th, 2007, 06:59 AM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 53
I agree with those who made the point that Venice is always worth seeing -- if only for one hour! It is so magical, and so totally different from any other city in the world, that no words can actually trasmit the experience. Besides if you took the sleeping car from Rome, you would arrive perfectly rested -- sleeping cars are a very civilized ways of traveling -- and fit for the fight!! By all means, go for it.
furs is offline  
May 17th, 2007, 11:55 AM
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 313
The one thing to keep in mind is that since travel time is so limited, every choice one makes involves compromise. Yes, Venice is spectacular and all else being equal is easily worth a day if that is all you can spare. However, all is not equal, as the OP only has 3 days total to see Rome and Venice.

The real question is not whether Venice worth visiting with only one day (I think it is), but whether Rome can be seen in 1.5 days enjoyably? In my experience, no (I've done it). If the OP had 5 days total in Rome and wanted to spend one of those days in Venice, I'd say go for it. But as it is, 3 days is probably the minimum amount of time one can realistically visit Rome without feeling like they are running the tourist gauntlet.
ripit is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 AM.