Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   Cruises (https://www.fodors.com/community/cruises/)
-   -   Tahitian Princess TR part two. (https://www.fodors.com/community/cruises/tahitian-princess-tr-part-two-644510/)

jacketwatch Sep 5th, 2006 03:33 PM

Tahitian Princess TR part two.
 
Hi guys; Time to report on the ship itself.
Lets begin with the physical appearance. First of all if you are looking for glitz and glamor then this is not the ship for you. The interior reminds you of an older, stately hotel. It is very clean and subdued in its decor. Even the casino seemed a bit sedate. If you like Vegasesque features you won't like this ship. Bear in mind it is the smallest ship in the Princess line along with its sistership the Pacific Princess. We learned during the "Meet The Captain" cocktail party that Princess is actually building a new SMALL ship with similar dimensions, i.e. 30K tons and a length of about 600 ft. which seems to buck the trend for all new ships being goliaths. What do you find with small vs. mega-liners? This is what we noticed; First of all you see the same people more often and this means you have more opportunities to meet and greet. It leads to a friendlier atmosphere I think. Secondly word on a smaller ship travels fast. As you recall from TR part one a woman suffered a cardiac arrest and died. It seemed in no time that everyone knew about it and everything else for that matter. Third you do feel the motion more, esp. if the seas are rough. For calm seas its no problem but if the waves and wind kick up you do notice it more, esp. if you are at either end of the ship. Amidships was much better so I would advise those going on smaller ships to be in the middle as much as possible. I wondered how the Paul Gaughin did in this weather. We saw her as we passed Raiatea the first time. She was docked but couldn't get out due to the choppy seas and the narrow inlet. She is only 18K tons and about 100 ft. less than the TP. Fourth its much easier to get the "lay of the land" as it were.
Next what about the service? In a word SUPER! If you read TR part 1 then you saw how wonderful that officer was in aiding us, esp. my wife in getting a more suitable room. Everyone working on that ship never once failed to be less than polite, accomodating and friendly. We felt welcomed and well considered. A few days into the cruise we took a galley tour and met the head chef. I was astounded when he asked my wife if she felt better. How he knew she had been ill I don't know but the fact that he did and asked was very impressive to us. Our cabin attendants were always polite, smiling and most importantly had our room spic and span. And our waiters were amazing! They were always on top of everything and worked tirelessly to be sure our needs were met. You know it seems that if you are friendly with them they more than return the favor to you. I really can't say enough about the overall excellence of the crew as a whole. Well done!
How about the shows? We actually missed about half of them but from what we saw we thought they were well done and professional. They acted well, danced well and performed capably overall. However as this is a small ship the stage was pretty small too. Personaly I prefer a bigger stage for that big productuion feel. The best performance came while in Raieatea when a local group of performers came on to show us native dances. They ranged from age 4 to about 18 and this was pretty neat to see.
OK what about the food. We were very pleased for the most part. I would avoid the scrambled eggs from the Panorama cafe but aside from that the breakfast selections were quite varied and really very good. I would go up there around opening time for coffee and pastries and bring that to our room. We would relax on the balcony, eat that then have our full breakfast in the main dining room. The selections were well made but I think their menu could be expanded. The coffee ( I am fussy about my coffee. I brought my own plus a French press to make it with) was suprisingly very good in the Panaroma cafe but pretty weak in the main dining room. I was very impressed with the buffet luncheons. It seemed there were 2-3 different salad selections every day w/o any repeating themselves. The Chinese cabbage/duck salad was especially good. They also have a great variety of main selections including things that you don't usually see such as Indian egg curry which actually even isn't on the menus of most Indian restaurants. Once day they had coconut shrimp which was fantstic and everyday they had a meat carving server dishing out whole roasted pig, scrumptious veal roasts, fresh turkey, roast beef and one day a whole tuna. Cold cuts and Pannini were always there.
We had dinner in the main dining room every night and what can I say except all was very well. There were always appetizers, salads, soups and entress selections followed by dessert of course. Again it seemed that there was very little repetition esp. for a 10 day cruise. As an aside my wife requested Indian food on our first night and did get it it every night thereafter. It was pretty good really and on day 8 I think the head chef and all his assistants paraded around the dinig room to receive a well deserved round of applause. Then we saw there were several Indian assistant cooks. No wonder the Indian food was so good. :-) I must add that on Italian night we were able to try the home-made lemoncello. :-) Momma mia! I bought a bottle today. :D
Overall I can see why this particular ship is so well rated on cruise critic. Actually as the FP destination is anything but glitz and glamor ala the Caribbean or Mexico this ships offerings fit percectly to this destination. If there are any questions I haven't addressed please ask. Cheers, Larry :-)

katybird Sep 5th, 2006 06:12 PM

Great review!
Is this ship fixed seating and/or anytime dining like the bigger Princess ships?

Percy Sep 5th, 2006 06:55 PM

Hi jacketwatch:

Good report as always.
I agree about the pro and cons of a smaller ship relative to the larger one.

I can understand about your wife getting seasick, and I guess this would be the main concern about a smaller ship , because seeing the same people more often on a smaller ship is okay.

I am assuming you flew from LA to Tahati..if so how long was the flight.?

Did anybody get the flu or any intestinal problem.?
People tend to get sick a bit more rapidly in the temperate climates.!


Yes I also want to know if Princess had "Anytime Dinning" or was it all fixed dinning.?!

Thank you very much.
Good report , I read it over a few times.
You really are a credit to this forum and a wealth of information when you do a report.

Percy

jacketwatch Sep 6th, 2006 03:45 AM

Hi Percy and thanks for the kind words. We did fly from LAX and the time was about 7 hrs. and 20 min. There was a young lad who did have some GI trouble whom we saw in the clinic the morning my wife went to see the MD but thats it and I saw him throughout the cruise so its seems it was a minor ailment. I heard of no other problems in this regard. Hand cleansing dispensers were everywhere and at meal times in the buffet area there was an employee actually dispensing it as you entered the line. As for the dining no there was not anytime dining except for the Panaroma cafe which you could go to whenever you pleased but its not like the larger Princess ships where you can have a served dinner from the main menu "anytime." You also have the options of Sabatini's or the steak house but at a surcharge of $15.00-20.00 pp I think. Cheers. Larry :-)`

Percy Sep 6th, 2006 12:39 PM

Thanks you very much jacketwatch.

I have saved your reports for future reading.!

Thanks
Percy


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 PM.