Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Canada
Reload this Page >

Happy wife, happy life? Not at the Post Hotel.

Happy wife, happy life? Not at the Post Hotel.

Apr 19th, 2006, 04:13 AM
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,663
Paul H, I went to the Post hotel website. There are many many images of the rooms. Every one shows a set of sheers and a heavy set of drapes as well. Didn't you try to close them? Perhaps they are just for show and do not close? Because it was obvious from the website that yes, the sun streams in and lights up the room thru those sheers, but you can always close the heavy fabric drapes. (I always bring one of those claw hair clips for the gap too - does your wife?)

Sincerely.
joan is offline  
Apr 19th, 2006, 09:35 AM
  #42  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9
The heavy drapes pull right across. I suggest anyone who is light sensitive not come to Alberta from mid June till mid August.. sun rises at 4:30 a.m. and sets late into the evening like 10:00 p.m. in June/early July. I love it. I find it energizing
amack is offline  
Apr 19th, 2006, 03:37 PM
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 133
Ah ha!!

Just like stanbr had his 'Perry Mason' moment with the sunrise time discrepancy, now I have mine. I see it now...

INTERIOR COURTROOM

DEFENSE ATTORNEY GOLDILOX: So you insist that the Post Hotel has light blocking drapes. And I quote from your post "Each and every room has sheers and drapes which block out the light."

AMACK: That is correct.

DEFENSE ATTORNEY GOLDILOX: Your Honor, I would like to enter into evidence Exhibit Q- a photograph of a room at the Post Hotel.

http://www.posthotel.com/slideshows/...whitehorn2.jpg

DEFENSE ATTORNEY GOLDILOX: Can you tell the court what the photo shows?

AMACK: (dejectedly) The light streaming through both the sheers and the drapes.

DEFENSE ATTORNEY GOLDILOX: The defense rests.
goldilox is offline  
Apr 19th, 2006, 03:51 PM
  #44  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 675
goldilox, that is priceless! I hope now the prosecution can rest and leave Paul alone. Case closed!
starfish1 is offline  
Apr 19th, 2006, 05:53 PM
  #45  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
Thankyou Goldilocks.
Paul_H is offline  
Apr 19th, 2006, 05:56 PM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 14,116
Any chance you will be in Durham soon, Goldilox?
cmcfong is offline  
Apr 19th, 2006, 07:44 PM
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,738
Goldilox, or should I say Perry Mason ? when you come to Portland Or, we will buy you a drink ! in the sunlight
Scarlett is offline  
Apr 25th, 2006, 10:19 AM
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,300
Poor little rabbit, not under threat by a wacko. Run rabbit run!
Curt is offline  
Apr 25th, 2006, 06:12 PM
  #49  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 35
Am I missing something here? I looked at the picture posted and clearly the light is shining through the sheers, but not the drapes, they are definitely open, NOT closed. I mean, I could care less how this whole thing ends, I am staying at the Post either way, come June. I just thought it fair to point out that the picture on Goldilox' link doesn't match the statements in the "mock courtroom" about the sun shining through the sheers AND the drapes. I've actually found this whole thing quite amusing! Thanks everyone.
kasperlie is offline  
Apr 26th, 2006, 07:49 PM
  #50  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
Have a look at the door. Not the windows, where the drapes are gathered, but the door, where the drapes are pulled halfway across. Have a look at the middle of the drapes, where they are not quite so gathered, in the not-quite-so-gathered way the window drapes would be if you were one of those tiresome, hard-to-please guests who like to do unreasonable things like trying to sleep. But we digreess. That bit that's not a dark as the bits that are gathered? That's light shining through.
Paul_H is offline  
Apr 27th, 2006, 01:40 AM
  #51  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
Digreess. Digress.
Tomaeto. Tomarto.
Paul_H is offline  
Apr 27th, 2006, 11:37 AM
  #52  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,087
Paul_H

I am happy to see you have kept a sense of humour after all of these remarks made by several of the posters. This is a board to express our opinions regarding travel, accommodations etc. You shouldn't have to go before the Spanish Inquisition. If people disagree just state your positive remarks - forget the personal attacks.
traveller69 is offline  
Apr 27th, 2006, 02:18 PM
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 72
Ok, I'll be the first to make a positive remark. I'm positively thrilled and count my lucky stars every morning to see the sun shining and to hear the birds chirping. Life is great!
gone is offline  
May 1st, 2006, 02:07 PM
  #54  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
In respone to Traveller 69,

You have to admit, the Spanish Inquisition thing does make it more interesting, though.
Paul_H is offline  
Jul 10th, 2006, 05:21 PM
  #55  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
Four and a half months after checkout, our complaint to the Post remains unacknowledged.
Paul_H is offline  
Jul 11th, 2006, 07:03 AM
  #56  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 25
I have just read this post with interest. I am also an aussie and I used to work at the Sheraton Hotel in Sydney.

Paul, perhaps it hasn't occurred to you that your original messages may have never reached the hotel managers, considering neither was there when you left both of them. If I were you, I would send another complaint letter/message advising of the 2 previous ones having gone unanswered, as your messages may have been innocently lost/misplaced.

My advice would be to ask for something in return. We used to receive many complaint letters, however unlike your complaint, all complaint letters were acknowledged in writing. However, only those who ever asked for reimbursement (ie free room, free meals for compensation etc) would in fact receive any reimbursement. They would usually be offered a free night's accommodation next time they visited, or more, depending on the extent of the complaint.

I am very surprised that a hotel of this calibre would choose to ignore your complaint, that's why I'm thinking that perhaps it never reached the manager. Considering you are still coming back to this thread 3 mths after you originally posted with a "still no reply" update tells me you are still upset over your stay, so perhaps you could give the hotel the benefit of the doubt, and write again and express your concerns.

Please keep us posted as to the outcome.

Also, don't just address your letter to "The Manager", find out the appropriate person's name and also copy the GM of the hotel.
AussiegallovesUSA is offline  
Jul 11th, 2006, 06:34 PM
  #57  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
Aussiegal,

I hear what you're saying but quite frankly, they've already been contacted in writing and on the 'phone, plus I've emailed them this thread - so if even there's no abject negligence at play here, I think I'd be favouring the word 'incompetent' over 'innocent'.

Either way, not a good look for a hotel of its alleged calibre.

Paul_H is offline  
Jul 14th, 2006, 09:58 PM
  #58  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,637
The last time we stayed at the Post Hotel we likrd the blackout shades so much we took them. Perhaps Paul and wife had our room

Andrewdavid
AndrewDavid is offline  
Jul 31st, 2006, 12:19 PM
  #59  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
Paul_H,

I have a reply to this thread. However, one important question to ask you first. Where are you from?
Hugh_Jass is offline  
Jul 31st, 2006, 12:36 PM
  #60  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,501
>>>>>>Where are you from?<<<<<<

I don't know in which city Paul_H lives, but in the original post he mentioned that Australia was home.

Judy_in_Calgary is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:21 PM.