Dismantling the Saphan Taksin BTS station platform!!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dismantling the Saphan Taksin BTS station platform!!
http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/loca...removal-begins
I hope this link works. I just found this on a TA thread. Looks like the BTS will NOT be so handy to Sathorn Pier for those of you who like to stay along the river.
I hope hanuman and/or michaelbkk can shed some light on this.
I hope this link works. I just found this on a TA thread. Looks like the BTS will NOT be so handy to Sathorn Pier for those of you who like to stay along the river.
I hope hanuman and/or michaelbkk can shed some light on this.
#2
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The BMA will build a moving walkway, or "walkalator", to carry commuters from Saphan Taksin station to Surasak station 700 metres away once the station has been dismantled."
It will be interesting to see how much impact this has for us. It sounds like it will still work well for those of us along the river.
It will be interesting to see how much impact this has for us. It sounds like it will still work well for those of us along the river.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd prefer to hop on the BTS at the river, and not have to take the 'walkalator' for 700 meters. In that BKK heat, it would not be my favorite way to spend some time. I frankly think they've made a very poor decision in closing Saphan Taksin station.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like the station is already closed??? I agree with making the double track to cross the river. This is certainly needed, as trains must sit and wait to go across the one existing track.
The walkalator will most probably not be ready for a while IMO.
The walkalator will most probably not be ready for a while IMO.
#7
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has a tentative schedule been announced for the dismantling of the station and the completion of the moving walkway? We had planned to stay at the Shangri La for one night in early November because of its easy access to the BTS.
The walkway will be almost 1/2 mile long - I'm not crazy about the idea either...
The walkway will be almost 1/2 mile long - I'm not crazy about the idea either...
#8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only about 3 - 4,000 people use that station on an average day so not justifying the expenses. The station has been dismantled already and there will be a walkway built but not a moving walkway. You guys will just have to literally walk.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm now looking at the Marriott Courtyard. The article said it will cost 600 million Baht for the walkway - seems like a lot of money for a walkway that does not move so I'm thinking that it will be moving - but... its a show stopper for us and yes I agree with Craig - the river hotels are going to take a hit due to this.
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That river hotel shuttle service, if provided, will be sitting in traffic. Not a very smart move.... even though cost effective for low ridership. Yes, the river hotels will certainly take a hit.
#17
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, and it's an especially cumbersome process with packages from shopping sprees at MBK and Platinum Fashion Mall!! lol
hanuman, the article specifically refers to a 'walkalator' which is part walk- and part escalator (or people mover). I read into it something that moves people who are walking. What are you reading that I'm not seeing?
I still will continue to say 'in the city' and visit the river area when/if necessary.
hanuman, the article specifically refers to a 'walkalator' which is part walk- and part escalator (or people mover). I read into it something that moves people who are walking. What are you reading that I'm not seeing?
I still will continue to say 'in the city' and visit the river area when/if necessary.