Guardian UK: The end of the budget airline?

May 29th, 2008, 12:46 PM
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,300
Guardian UK: The end of the budget airline?

The end of the budget airline?
Dan Milmo in Houston, Friday May 23 2008

The list of bankrupt airlines is growing by the week, but the biggest casualty of the oil squeeze in the airline industry could be the cheap fare and the holiday plans of a generation weaned on affordable air travel. A decade of low ticket prices has fuelled the Tallinn stag do and made Ryanair an unlikely linchpin in the market for continental second homes. It has also led to a 200% growth in UK regional airports. But airline executives warn that fares have to rise.

This raises serious questions over the business models of two of the most financially robust carriers in the world: Ryanair and easyJet. The dominant players in the European budget airline market rely on low fares to pack their aircraft, wringing profits out of passengers by charging for add-ons such as luggage check-in and hotel bookings.

British Airways, Air France-KLM and Australia's Qantas are hoping to trade their way out of trouble by raising fares, but that approach is anathema to Ryanair and easyJet. According to analysts at the investment bank Credit Suisse, they have to take action.

"Without the benefit of fuel hedging, and in the absence of mitigating action by management teams, we do not believe that any airline can be profitable in the medium term not even easyJet and Ryanair," said Credit Suisse, acknowledging that Ryanair will slip into a loss if oil trades at $140 a barrel. Even Michael O'Leary, the combative chief executive of the Irish carrier, was forced this week to concede that the oil price was "really hurting".

EasyJet admits fares will have to rise, but says it will still be cheaper than competitors. "In the long term no industry can exist if it doesn't cover its costs. However, that cost is very different for different airlines and it is incumbent now on all airlines to look at all areas of their costs base to see where other costs can be axed to keep fares low," said Toby Nicol, easyJet's director of communications. ....(more)

The complete piece is at:

martytravels is offline  
May 29th, 2008, 12:51 PM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 288
I'm not sure about the European industry, but in the U.S., the airline that is doing the best (in terms of managing fuel costs and, IMHO, in terms of customer service), is Southwest Airlines, a budget carrier.
Trekker5211 is offline  
May 29th, 2008, 04:20 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
What was the last time you compared Southwest fares to legacy domestic fares?

Budget? - don't think so.
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
May 29th, 2008, 05:55 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,374
Southwest made a huge bet on oil prices when they bought their long hedges. Other airlines either obeyed the dictates of the green-eyeshade crowd in their bean-counting offices (AA most notably) or else were indisposed in bankruptcy court, to do the same.

When Southwest's hedges expire (next year and the year after) their shareholders will get a seriously cold shower.

We might as well get used to economic pricing of things like air travel and artichokes.
Gardyloo is offline  
May 30th, 2008, 01:30 AM
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,176
The author of the piece quoted seems to miss the basic point.

Unless - which no-one believes - oil prices fall sharply, ALL airlines are going to hike their fares, and passenger numbers will fall.

That's going to hurt most those airlines least able to react quickly. Ryanair et al, with no unions, no legacy of pension committments, post-retirement health benefits or rash promises to fly former customers for free, can chop what it likes a lot easier than anyone else.

It'll be a smaller airline, there won't be any more flights from Liverpool to Cracow and the French market for country houses will collapse. But Ryanair will still be the world's largest carrier of international passengers and just about the most reliable money-maker (or at least loss-avoider) in the aviation industry.

The question isn't about the viability of Ryanair. It's who else will survive as an independent airline. At least one of the global majors won't: nor will lots of second division players - budget and legacy alike.
flanneruk is online now  
May 30th, 2008, 02:20 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,751
Certainly the oil price is going to hurt many. But airlines in some parts of the world are doing ok. Air Asia as a budget carrier recently added a checked bag charge, but it was $1 ! , Tiger Airways are doing ok and adding more routes, they still have very cheap fares.
JamesA is offline  
May 30th, 2008, 07:59 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,826
JamesA: I have seen reports that AirAsia is actually in some pretty serious financial trouble.
travelgourmet is offline  
May 30th, 2008, 11:23 AM
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,466
Travelgourmet - i am in the process of booking some flights on Air Asia for November. Do you think i should hold off them based on your comment re they may be in financial trouble?
Smeagol is offline  
May 30th, 2008, 11:36 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,826
I really don't know.

What I saw was not much of a comment. It was just an aside in the midst of a larger article, so I wouldn't make too much of it. They do have some deep-pocketed backers, including Richard Branson.

Besides, my experience is that the flights are pretty darn cheap, so at the prices they charge, I would probably just book it, risks be damned.

UPDATE: Apparently, they just announced earnings and recorded an 86% increase in profits. This isn't a guarantee, but I would feel pretty darn confident.
travelgourmet is offline  
May 30th, 2008, 12:49 PM
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,466
many thanks for the update, your right the flights are cheap so i may as well go for it.
Smeagol is offline  
May 30th, 2008, 08:23 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,751
Have never heard of anything about Air Asia not doing well, "and recorded an 86% increase in profits". They have more aircraft on order and providing a good service. Many on the Asia forum have taken recent flights with them and quite satisfied.

They do have 'cheap flights' and the almost fly for free, but book a flight when there are few seats left and for example Bangkok to Phuket at $130 return is just a little under what Thai were charging a few years back.

The budget airlines have those amazing offers to attract customers, not everyone gets the very low deal, when they manage though to fill a plan they are on average getting an ok fare. They have so few extra costs to worry about and their costs are just lower all round.

Air Asia X launched budget into Gold Coast Australia, within months increased flights and adding Perth in November ( earlier if they can find aircraft ). Tiger now also operate domestic within Australia as well as their Singapore hub.

I agree with flanneruk that an airline in the market without all that 'financial baggage' is in a better place to survive.
JamesA is offline  
Related Topics
Original Poster
Last Post
Air Travel
May 20th, 2012 05:08 PM
Air Travel
Feb 7th, 2011 02:00 AM
Air Travel
May 8th, 2010 08:36 AM
United States
Dec 11th, 2009 09:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 PM.