Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Air Travel
Reload this Page >

definition of internationl "secure" area with international airports

definition of internationl "secure" area with international airports

Old Feb 25th, 2014, 03:40 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definition of internationl "secure" area with international airports

I thought I understood that when one was in transit internationally, landed/connected at an intervening airport and remained in the "international area" of this airport(if it has one) and did NOT enter the country by clearing customs/passport control one is technically not "in" that country. Since I am applying my own definition to this I will hear/listen to corrections to that definition. I am leading to this--and specifically Canada, and specifically the Toronto airport. Recently my wife was booked on a flight from dfw to Istanbul via Toronto. It is a given that she is on a Canadian "list" of nationalities which "require" what is apparently called a transit visa. My question is, if she was not scheduled nor had any intent to actually enter the country of Canada(and she didn't)(i.e., stay in the "international area") why was ANY kind of visa required? We have encountered visa "situations" before but it was only when actually entering the country in question. If someone could clarify this for me I would appreciate it. Thanks
rickypat is offline  
Old Feb 25th, 2014, 06:10 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Canada is one of few countries that do not have passport control for leaving the country. There is so true "transit"
area like in airports of other countries. When you fly into Canada, you must either go through Canadian immigration to enter Canada; or if you are at a few terminals, you go through US immigration to enter US. That's why you need a visa.

Not directly related to your question, but here in Hong Kong, even though there IS true secured transit area where the passenger does not enter HK, passengers from a handful of countries STILL need transit visa even just to change planes.

Some countries just don't want transit passengers from certain countries to come through their airport and ask for asylum, for example.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Feb 25th, 2014, 06:11 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry. I meant to say "NO true transit area" in Canada.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Feb 25th, 2014, 07:55 AM
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what you are also saying, I think, is that there is no true "international area" in the Toronto airport, even they kinda/sorta indicate there is. I've never been there--don't know--the subject was my wife. I was in Hong Kong many years ago, but she has never been. Thank you.
rickypat is offline  
Old Feb 25th, 2014, 05:56 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basically yes.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Feb 25th, 2014, 10:59 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought I understood that when one was in transit internationally, landed/connected at an intervening airport and remained in the "international area" of this airport(if it has one) and did NOT enter the country by clearing customs/passport control one is technically not "in" that country.

UK law requires a visa for some nationalities EVEN if they are staying airside, UK law can also detain and arrest people even if they stay airside.
alanRow is offline  
Old Feb 26th, 2014, 12:54 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are many countries who require a transit visa, not just the UK.
Odin is offline  
Old Feb 26th, 2014, 04:40 AM
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to alanrow---your premise is where I began with this question, because that was my understanding as well. Apparently Canada has a different twist to the idea. And yes, I understand that some countries require a visa even if one remains "international".
rickypat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
icebreaker
Asia
5
Jul 19th, 2013 10:59 AM
mzubair6594
Asia
6
Jan 24th, 2012 07:59 AM
sylvia3
Asia
7
Jul 10th, 2009 06:39 AM
cindy1
Asia
8
Jul 12th, 2005 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -