AA1348 12/29/06

Jan 6th, 2007, 02:01 PM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
AA1348 12/29/06

I haven't heard of it until it became front page story on Wall Street Journal today. Apparently, it has been pretty big news in Dallas.

Go get the Weekend Wall Street Journal (1/6/07), or check out this long thread on Flyertalk.


Don't the AA managers:

1) know about Northworst Airlines?

2) know that passengers now have cellphones, webblogs, Flyertalk, etc?

It's unbelievable that they can still let this happen these days. A bunch of people need to lose their jobs.
rkkwan is offline  
Jan 6th, 2007, 06:06 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,659
I noted that there was one poster on that ft thread that was quick to try to shift the blame to the "airport control people" and away from AA.
mrwunrfl is online now  
Jan 6th, 2007, 06:33 PM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
What makes all this so ridiculous, and even less excusable than Northwest, is that AUS was functioning, and AA's flights from there to ORD or SLC were going out.

While there was thunderstorms, it wasn't like AUS was under several feet of snow (like what happened at DTW).
rkkwan is offline  
Jan 6th, 2007, 07:52 PM
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 448
It actually didn't get as much play as you would think. AA seems to have most newspapers here in some sort of trance. If this was CO in EWR or UA in ORD, they'd be all over it.

In AUS, AA is the 2nd largest carrier after Southwest. They have significant clout and to blame the controllers is absurd or an employee.
tmh is offline  
Jan 6th, 2007, 11:56 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,659
hmm, maybe it was Southwest's fault. they are out to get AA, aren't they?

here is a bit from the ft thread:

quote from the WSJ article

"A few passengers were allowed down the staircase in the plane's tail to the tarmac to walk dogs that had been in the cargo hold."
mrwunrfl is online now  
Jan 8th, 2007, 07:43 AM
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,601
Unbelievable, except the part that it's AA -- except apparently other airlines were involved.

If the pilot finally "took it on himself" to get to the terminal at 8:15, why not earlier than that? Not that it was at all the pilot's fault.

You can't do that even at a jail... although you can do it in an ER (but at least there are machines and toilet cleaning crews....).

I'd love to see a barrage of lawsuits, but seems to me the actions of the Austin people have to be examined too. With the Northworst/snow incident, the airline essentially "owned" the airport. Here it would seem to be both airline and airport who needed -- shall we say -- better guidelines? Or let's just say "common sense and decency"!
HKP is offline  
Jan 8th, 2007, 10:40 AM
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
The situation now is even worse when soemthing like this happens, compared to the NWA incident a few years ago, because of restrictions against liquids. I wouldn't have been thrilled if this happened to me pre-August 2006, but at least I would have had bottles of water. I would also have had food. Now I've given up on water, of course. Up to now, I had given up on food rather than try to puzzle out whether something is a solid, gel, or liquid, but maybe that's not a good idea.

My understanding is that the airlines escaped onerous regulations after the NWA incident because they promised to bring in their own. Obviously that didn't work.
WillTravel is offline  
Jan 8th, 2007, 11:03 AM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,291
I bet they sold all of their snack packs!
wally34949 is offline  
Jan 8th, 2007, 11:07 AM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
Yes, the airline industry as a whole lobbied very hard in Washington to fight off the "Passenger Bill of Rights" after the NW incident. That's why it's so shocking AA can let this happen. Unbelievable.
rkkwan is offline  
Jan 9th, 2007, 09:34 AM
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,190
Interestingly enough, the WSJ article didn't appear in the Fort Worth paper until today - not exactly new "news". Coincidentally, AA's corporate headquarters are in Tarrant County (Fort Worth)...
dorkforcemom is offline  
Jan 9th, 2007, 09:47 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,600
But of course it was the Dallas Morning News that broke the story last week...

Gardyloo is online now  
Jan 10th, 2007, 05:38 AM
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 377
While I'm no fan of AA, in today's climate, I could see that happening with just about any of the U.S. carriers (with the exception of NW). As rkkwan alluded to, the Passenger Bill of Rights was killed because of empty airline promises to improve. It's now time to bring this back and get it passed.

It's simple -- in situations like this, after a reasonable amount of time (say, NW's rule of 3 hrs.), the airlines should be required to allow passengers to deplane and provide them with suitable alternate means to get to their destinations.

I hope those passengers sue the pants off of AA! There's absolutely no excuse for this deplorable treatment!
LT is offline  
Jan 10th, 2007, 06:18 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,711
Sad to see that AA lost the DFW Beijing route.....
BeachBoi is offline  
Jan 10th, 2007, 01:07 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,659
Good news for Washington D.C. fliers:
mrwunrfl is online now  
Jan 11th, 2007, 03:50 AM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,291
This story made the NBC evening news last night. Keep us informed of what happens. I'll bet people in First Class get miles and people in coach get an apology.
wally34949 is offline  
Related Topics
Original Poster
Last Post
Air Travel
Aug 8th, 2012 03:43 PM
Air Travel
Mar 31st, 2008 09:18 AM
Air Travel
Feb 4th, 2008 03:05 PM
Air Travel
Apr 16th, 2003 05:39 PM
United States
Apr 15th, 2003 07:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM.