Tripod or not to tripod

Reply

Nov 1st, 2004, 04:36 AM
  #1
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21
Tripod or not to tripod

Is it worth carrying tripod for indoor/evening/night photography? I have read that tripods arenot allowed inside monuments. Is it allowed in temples at night?

Thank you.
sunil_sivadas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 1st, 2004, 05:50 AM
  #2
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11
Hi,

I'm planning a trip myself, so I don't have first hand experience. Check out
www.photo.net and do a search for "Egypt". Lots of good discussion on this and other Egypt photo related topics.
steven03 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 1st, 2004, 11:27 PM
  #3
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21
hi steven
thanks for the pointer.
sunil_sivadas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 2nd, 2004, 03:42 AM
  #4
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,960
We saw people with tripods - so they must be allowed in some places. However, traffic flow and sheer number of people make them difficult to use without obstructions by passers-by and annoying for people who trip over them.
gail is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 2nd, 2004, 08:06 PM
  #5
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 125
Officially, tripods aren't allowed in temples, museums, historical sites, etc. However, baksheesh goes a long ways, so you might want to risk it.

I didn't take mine but still managed to get many decent night photos. I brought a small hand towell that I would rest on walls and other semi-flat surfaces. It worked good enough. Yes, I would have preferred the tripod, but I know I also would have been denied entrance in many places - so, I think I made the right tradeoff. You can view these photos here:

http://www.brucegcollier.com/galleri...level2_all.htm

Carry some fairly high-speed film, too. I got some of my evening shots handheld...

Have a great trip. Egypt is one of a kind.

Regards, Bruce
www.brucegcollier.com
bg_collier is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 4th, 2004, 04:43 AM
  #6
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21
Hi Bruce

Thanks for the tips.
What speed films did you carry? 400,800,1600?

Thanks
sunil_sivadas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 6th, 2004, 04:21 PM
  #7
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
A small, lightweight alternative to a tripod is a ClamPod - a clamp with a standard mount on it. You can buy one, or you can weld a screw on a pair of ViseGrips for 1/4 the cost.
Robespierre is offline  
Reply With Quote
Nov 7th, 2004, 05:17 AM
  #8
rfb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
While you can't beat a tripod for best quality, unless you are a professional, high speed film is your best bet. After a while, lugging a camera bag around becomes a real pain; a camera bag, water and a worthwhile tripod will soon put a real damper on your trip.

 
Reply With Quote
Nov 7th, 2004, 12:04 PM
  #9
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 125

Hi Sunil,

You're welcome.

I now carry print film in 400 speed (as well as slower) as the quality has gotten as good as the ISO 100 of only a few years ago. On that particular trip, however, I did not have anything but 100 and 50. I was able to get some decent early-evening shots handheld with ISO 100 film. Not recommended, but it did the trick.

Regards, Bruce
www.brucegcollier.com -- Fine-art Travel Photography
bg_collier is offline  
Reply With Quote
 



Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:04 PM.