Direct flight from Chicago to Joberg?

Oct 2nd, 2007, 03:47 AM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,422
Direct flight from Chicago to Joberg?

I thought I remembered reading here that there are now direct flights from Chicago. I assumed that meant that we didn't have to change planes in DC anymore??? Was I just dreaming this or did I misunderstand the info.
Lillipets is offline  
Oct 2nd, 2007, 04:39 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,170
Unfortunately, there are no direct flights from Chicago to JNB. South African was going to start direct flights last spring/summer but abandoned these plans.
Marija is online now  
Oct 2nd, 2007, 02:33 PM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,422
Thanks Marija

I'm disappointed to hear that but at least I know I wasn't dreaming it!
Lillipets is offline  
Oct 2nd, 2007, 06:36 PM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 172
I find this really confusing, but a friend in the airline business always points out that "direct" and "non-stop" are not the same. So if someone says a flight is "direct," you have to ask the next question . . . Is it also non-stop.

It beats me why direct flights frequently involve a plane change, but they sure do.
Pula is offline  
Oct 2nd, 2007, 07:56 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,373
"Direct" usually means one flight number. For example, South African flight 208 is nonstop from Washington DC to Joburg. Flight 207, the return, is direct in that it stops in Dakar en route (mainly for fuel.) Occasionally, you'll see flights with one flight number that actually require a change of planes somewhere - Iberia is notorious for this - many long distance flights to/from Barcelona actually stop and change planes in Madrid along the way.
Gardyloo is online now  
Oct 3rd, 2007, 03:26 AM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,422
I said direct but I really meant non stop. ARGH!
I was hoping for non stop. Maybe at some point in the future???? I can dream can't I?
After all I used to dream of going to Africa and now I'm planning my 3rd trip!
Lillipets is offline  
Oct 3rd, 2007, 07:48 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,373
ORD-JNB would be right on the edge of what's physically possible for current planes to handle nonstop, and even then it would only be nonstop eastbound; going westbound the prevailing wind would definitely require a fuel stop, as is now the case with the westbound SAA flights. AFAIK, the only longer current operating flight would be Singapore's Newark-Singapore service. On that flight they can't even fill the plane to capacity (meaning normal passenger loads and little room for cargo) so it loses money for the airline. I can't conceive of there being enough traffic to warrant service from ORD.
Gardyloo is online now  
Related Topics
Original Poster
Last Post
Air Travel
Oct 14th, 2010 03:55 PM
Oct 1st, 2007 07:23 AM
Air Travel
Feb 8th, 2007 02:21 PM
Air Travel
Jan 19th, 2006 10:18 AM
United States
Jun 4th, 2003 08:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM.