How Much is a Pack of Cigarettes In Las Vegas
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How Much is a Pack of Cigarettes In Las Vegas
Doing better with the smoking. Used to smoke a pack and a half every day, but after several failed attempts I've now cut back to "social smoking", a few cigarettes once or twice a week.
I know the moment I hit the tarmac in Las Vegas I'll be heading for the nearest cigarette stand. Generally, what's the price range out there for a pack of Marlboro Lights?
I know the moment I hit the tarmac in Las Vegas I'll be heading for the nearest cigarette stand. Generally, what's the price range out there for a pack of Marlboro Lights?
#4
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's my experience that cigarettes are usually cheaper in Vegas. The last time I went I brought a few packs and paid more for them at home, in Houston, than they cost in Vegas. I think they're like $3.00-$3.50 a pack.
#10
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Al, give up smoking inmediately ! You are among the ones that bores us non smokers with your f... smoke, everywhere, anytime, the one that polutes the pavement with thousands of cigarette's ends, the one that is killing himself and the others . . . I hate smokers, I could not be with a moker, f... smokers !! go to hell !!
#12
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good for you that you don't smoke a pack and a half a day anymore. Since you've come this far, why not give it up completely? It's so easy to slip back and smoke just a few more and a few more, then you're right back where you started. Do your health and your wallet a favor and quit completely.
#13
I don't think he was asking for advice on quitting. Al - cigarettes will definitely be cheaper in Las Vegas than in NYC. If you purchase them in the casino, they'll run around $5 per pack. They'll be cheaper outside of your hotel or casino.
#16
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why are you worried about how much cigarettes cost>>and you are going to the gambling capital of the world!!
quit now! so u can put money in the slot machines! instead!!! and it isnt detrimental to your health!
if u cant afford cigarettes now..dont go on a gambling spree to vegas!!
quit now! so u can put money in the slot machines! instead!!! and it isnt detrimental to your health!
if u cant afford cigarettes now..dont go on a gambling spree to vegas!!
#17
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I m sorry..but ask a stupid question..get a stupid answerLOL
I am glad we have a non smoking state (restaurants etc)non smoking!! I cant stand ashtray breath and people like you who stink up our cities!no offense Big Al!!
I am glad we have a non smoking state (restaurants etc)non smoking!! I cant stand ashtray breath and people like you who stink up our cities!no offense Big Al!!
#18
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've always had a theory, that the radical non-smokers are really ex-smokers who are afraid they might start again if they smell a little smoke.
Why do I continue to smoke? A few cigarettes now and then don't hurt anyone. Nobody ever died from smoking a pack every ten days.
To those who answered the question, thanks -- I'll figure about $5.
Why do I continue to smoke? A few cigarettes now and then don't hurt anyone. Nobody ever died from smoking a pack every ten days.
To those who answered the question, thanks -- I'll figure about $5.
#20
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The last part about "no one has ever died from smoking a pack every ten days" is not true, Al.
Lung cancer is a process which starts with a cell mutation, and the number of cells which must reproduce to replace the ones damaged by the smoke increases with the number of cigarettes smoked.
But the necessary mutations which cause lung cancer can be induced by only a few years of regular use. The latency period, however, can be many years.
The point is that you are already at least at moderate risk for lung cancer if you've been smoking for several years.
Every additional pack just adds to your total risk.
And the old saying that 5-7 years after quitting your risk goes back down to that of a non-smoker is now known to be UNtrue.
Lung cancer is a process which starts with a cell mutation, and the number of cells which must reproduce to replace the ones damaged by the smoke increases with the number of cigarettes smoked.
But the necessary mutations which cause lung cancer can be induced by only a few years of regular use. The latency period, however, can be many years.
The point is that you are already at least at moderate risk for lung cancer if you've been smoking for several years.
Every additional pack just adds to your total risk.
And the old saying that 5-7 years after quitting your risk goes back down to that of a non-smoker is now known to be UNtrue.