Search

Napa?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7th, 2017, 07:09 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Napa?

Coming to CA from the east coast, first time. Is Napa a good place to stay on its own, with dining and entertainment, or should we stay in SF and come to wine country for a day trip? Looking to stay 7-10 days. Thanks in advance!
mrspresident is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017, 08:27 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm no expert, but I could easily spend three days in Sonoma, two days in Napa, and a couple of days in Mendocino just looking at scenery without ever tasting a drop of wine.

The only circumstance in which a one day excursion would be worth it to me would be a tour of high end wineries that I couldn't easily get into on my own.

But any time is better than no time!
Ackislander is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017, 09:05 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 17,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it's hard to answer without knowing how into wine you are. We just spent 10 days divided between St. Helena (in Napa), Booneville (near Mendocino) and Healdsburg (in Sonoma), driving around, walking in towns and among redwoods, and tasting a LOT of wine. Dining options abound. But again, maybe you just want a quick dip into wine country? I'd suggest a couple of nights in that case. If you've never been to SF, you must spend at least a few days there.
NewbE is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017, 09:23 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be bored silly after 3 days of wine tasting (actually after 1 - I'm being generous) but the area north of San Francisco is fabulous if you're looking for a combination of charming little towns, scenery/nature and wine and great food. Why not split it up differently - maybe 3 days in San Francisco and the rest north of the city?
sf7307 is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017, 12:57 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,334
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I agree with sf7307. A day or two of wine tasting is enough for us. If you have never been to SF, then spend some time in the City.
MichelleY is offline  
Old Jan 8th, 2017, 08:38 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with 7-10 days, I would definitely do at least 2-3 nights in San Francisco, one of the most amazing cities anywhere. I would spend the rest of the time exploring Napa, Sonoma, and the coast. Healdsburg would be one of my choices for a town to stay at in wine country.
zootsi is offline  
Old Jan 9th, 2017, 06:33 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 49,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What time of year are you going?

Hopefully not within the next few weeks. Currently they are having serious flooding.

'The best time to visit Napa is September through November or March through May. Napa's peak tourist season corresponds with the region's harvest season (August through October). During this busy time, expect high prices for everything, including food, accommodations and wine tours.'

DH and I went in December one year and loved it, it was very quiet no crowds, some light rain, some beautiful sunny but cools days. But the vines are cut back and barren.
nanabee is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jonescm128
United States
7
Oct 28th, 2018 06:34 PM
southgeorgiagirl
United States
10
Feb 4th, 2009 09:54 AM
tlf18
United States
32
Jul 19th, 2005 12:39 PM
lomillerin
United States
5
Apr 17th, 2004 04:08 AM
alsbach
United States
6
Jun 3rd, 2003 04:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -