Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Another NY hotel question

Search

Another NY hotel question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7th, 2007, 12:15 PM
  #1  
dmlove
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Another NY hotel question

I've read all the recent threads about "reasonably priced" NY hotels. We are going for 5 nts over Thanksgiving weekend. Typically, we consider ourselves "upper range of middle" or "lower end of high" -- Marriotts, for example. We have stayed at and liked the Times Square Hilton, the Westin Times Square and the Renaissance Times Square. Years ago, we stayed at the Shelburne Murray Hill, which was great for a family, but was a little old and tired for my taste.

Location doesn't matter as long as it's in Manhattan and reasonably near the subway.

So, with that all said, all of the following are available for 3 adults in one room (couple and 20-year old daughter). Are the more expensive of these worth up to $200 a night more than the less expensive?

Flatotel Jr. Suite $370
Affinia 50 Jr. Suite $378
Affinia Dumont 1 BR Suite $393
Roger Williams 2 dbls. $394
Affinia Manhattan 1 BR Suite $423
Bedford Tower King Suite $427
Omni Berkshire Deluxe King $437
Time 1 BR Suite $454
Benjamin 1 BR Sutie $490
Fitzpatrick Suite $569

Among the Affinias, what's the difference amont the 50, the Dumont and Manhattan (besides location, of course). Is one newer than the others? Different styles? Size of rooms? I guess those questions go for all of the above.

Thanks.
 
Old Aug 7th, 2007, 12:42 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My first question is are the suites listed below real "suites" -- i.e., with a separate room -- or are they "one-room suites" -- the hotel industry jargon for a larger room with a small sitting area? If they are real suites, it might be worth the money and I'd take the Benjamin or Fitzpatrick as I've heard very good things about both (and stayed in a suite at the Fitzp myself).

If not, I'd probably go for the Roger Williams. Friends have stayed there and loved it and you're getting a good rate. My other choice would be the Omni Berkshire as it's a lovely hotel.
lisettemac is offline  
Old Aug 7th, 2007, 01:47 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 8,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We stayed at the Flatoel and liked it very much. It was extrememly attractive, and our standard room was quite large.
abram is offline  
Old Aug 8th, 2007, 03:38 PM
  #4  
dmlove
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Add to the list the Doubletree Metropolitan and the Residence Inn.

Oh, and in addition to the other hotels I've stayed at previously, add The Wellington (through Priceline) which was a little on the "tourist class" side for me.

Any more advice?
 
Old Aug 8th, 2007, 04:59 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been to the Flatotel, the Bedford and the Roger Williams. All are nice. The Flat and the Bedford have rooms that are larger than the typical NY hotel room, so you won't feel like sardines in a can, like you might in one of the chains. The higher prices are normally for hotels with more amenities, so it depends on what you want from your hotel, whether you want to pay. The nice thing about the Bedford is that it is in a quieter area (of course, quiet is relative in NY). Check out this site for good prices and no extra fees (plus pay when you stay at the hotel instead of in advance): CRSHotels.com. Have fun in NYC!
indietraveler2 is offline  
Old Aug 8th, 2007, 07:39 PM
  #6  
dmlove
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks. I need NO amenities! Won't have time to work out, won't be there long enough to need to do laundry, never eat in hotel restaurants, won't be around for room service. I like the room to be nicely decorated, with comfortable beds, pillows and linens, with a good shower and enough room that 3 people won't be tripping all over each other.
 
Old Aug 8th, 2007, 08:15 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
indietraveler2 is here marketing his/her website.

Hey indie, PAY for your ads you bum!
TxTravelPro is offline  
Old Aug 8th, 2007, 08:21 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dmlove,
You can hardly compare some of these hotels.
I have stayed in the Affinia 50 and it was perfectly fine. Very large with a full kitchen. The Benjamin is a higher end hotel. For 120.00 more a day, I would stay at the 50 and have a good dinner
Be sure to take home those leftovers for breakfast or brunch!
TxTravelPro is offline  
Old Aug 8th, 2007, 08:25 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reading your last post let me add... the beds at the 50 are great, there is NO restaurant, I have always had a decent shower and PLENTY of room!
I have had 5, yes 5, people in their standard suite (2 queen beds and 1 queen sofa bed).
TxTravelPro is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2007, 08:23 AM
  #10  
dmlove
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
TxTravelPro, thanks -- I know these hotels don't all fall in the same category, that's one of the reasons I was asking, i.e. whether the more expensive hotels are so much nicer than the less expensive hotels that I should spend the extra $$. I appreciate your thoughts.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carlota
United States
5
Sep 29th, 2006 04:12 AM
rosetravels
United States
8
Jan 17th, 2006 10:26 AM
traveler100
United States
14
Jan 16th, 2006 12:42 PM
Heavens
United States
6
Jan 11th, 2005 10:28 AM
flowergirl
United States
11
Jul 21st, 2003 04:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -