Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Alaskan Cruise OR Yellowstone/GT??

Search

Alaskan Cruise OR Yellowstone/GT??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20th, 2005, 02:25 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alaskan Cruise OR Yellowstone/GT??

For those who have been to both Alaska & Yellowstone:

I'm trying to decide whether we (me, husband and then 18 year old son) will go on an Alaskan cruise or to Yellowstone/Teton NP for our '06 summer trip.

Originally we were planning on a 4-5 day land tour of interior Alaska (Denali), with a 7 night cruise (Whittier to Vancouver). Later thought it might not be a great idea to kennel our aging dog that long (about 14 nights). So we're considering the 7 night cruise only. Now thinking going to Yellowstone for 3-4 nights then Jackson Hole for 3-4 nights would fit the bill... seeing lots of natural, spectacular beauty and WILDLIFE. My questions are: which is a more beautiful, spectacular area to see? Which might afford me more wildlife viewing (I understand that while on the cruise, I'd have to pay BIG bucks for excursions - the bear sighting one is over $310 pp)! Will we still see marvelous, magnificent views in Yellowstone/GT - I've heard nothing but wonderful raves about Alaska.

Thanks for any insight or suggestions!

Lisa
LPOWMACBACK is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2005, 02:58 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 14,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My vote would be to go to Yellowstone/Teton. You will see lots of wildlife, probably spend less (we stayed at Signal Mountain Lodge in the Tetons and Old Faithful Lodge in Yellowstone) and not feel the pain of kenneling your dog (you might even consider a house/petsitter, one of your son's friend's possibly to minimize the difficulty for your dog...I do understand how that factors in). We did the Alaska cruise (7 days Holland-America) followed by a week in Denali-Kenai. The land portion was spectacular, the cruise not so much. We enjoyed our shore excursions to Sitka and the Mendenhall Glacier area and the naturalist's presentations, but generally we had bad weather and low visibility so there was not much to see. I am the first to admit that we would have rather been outside walking than hanging around the ship. Cruising isn't our typical vacation and we only did it to reach the regions we would otherwise not have seen (and of course, due to the weather we didn't see anyway).
cmcfong is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2005, 03:22 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First regarding the dog - I'd find someone to come in and house/dog sit while you are gone, rather than kenneling a aging dog. Often, the vet techs do this on the side. If not, ask your vet for a referral.

Your other thread asked about resorts in Yellowstone or GT. Considering your expectations, you may prefer the cruise. I've done Alaska (both times in winter and grew up camping. We took the ferry from Juneau to Haines to pick up the Alcan highway into the Yukon one November (driving on snowpack the entire way through a blue-tinted winter wonderland). The views from the ship/ferry are just spectacular and I'm glad I've been there. But, it sounds that for length of time you prefer to be gone, the Yellowstone/GT trip would be a better option for you at this time.

If you want to see WILDLIFE consider a Thanksgiving trip to Alaska. The Chilkat river at Haines does not freeze and all (or it seems like all) of the Bald Eagles in North America congregate there to spend the winter. Bald Eagles are everywhere - clustered together on bare trees as oranges on an orange tree!
starrsville is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2005, 04:25 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we did both during summer 02.

Alaska has more spectacular scenery, but Grand Teton is quite impressive and the gesyers of Yellowstone are great.

We saw more wildlife in Yellowstone/Grand Teton than in Alaska (altho we didn't go into the interior of Denali). Buffalo and elk everywhere. Also saw 3-4 bears, several moose (grand teton) and some deer. In alaska we saw moose, a wolk, and bald eagle
bigtyke is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2005, 04:35 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,394
Received 79 Likes on 8 Posts
Given your time constraints I'd go for Yellowstone etc. Note that it's a pretty different experience - high density tourism in the national parks, v. high density buffets and crowded ports on the 7-day boats. Depending on how and where you're traveling, the national parks option will probably be cheaper than 2 cabins on a cruise ship. Plus if it's a one-way cruise (Vancouver-Seward or v.v.) the lack of time in southcentral Alaska would leave you feeling cheated I'd bet, while the 7-day round trips (Seattle or Vancouver) show you southeast Alaska but nothing else. I'd wait for more time to do Alaska justice.

The only other thing I'd suggest you investigate is Banff and Jasper parks in Canada. Now that will knock your socks off, also plenty of creatures.
Gardyloo is online now  
Old Jun 21st, 2005, 11:31 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ttt. I'd never choose the cruise over traveling Alaska independently via car, rail, and/or local flights. Maybe Yellowstone would be best for this trip.
BayouGal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
perka86
United States
10
Feb 25th, 2018 08:52 AM
Aditjain
United States
11
Jun 4th, 2011 10:41 AM
Amere
United States
17
Mar 20th, 2011 06:36 PM
spirobulldog
United States
18
Apr 27th, 2008 04:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -