Travel Tips & Trip Ideas Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Travel Tips & Trip Ideas activity »
  1. 1 Self service laundry naples
  2. 2 The Internet is all abuzz about by NexGen
  3. 3 Road trip from D.C. to Maine
  4. 4 Trip to eurpoe and sweden
  5. 5 Is there a trick to booking a "comfort" seat?
  6. 6 Use of ATM cards in foreign country?
  7. 7 My Trip to Spain
  8. 8 5 Best travel apps? (open)
  9. 9 Senior lady travels solo
  10. 10 Destination Help (w/ specifics)
  11. 11 Ideas for 1 week trip
  12. 12 travel insurance
  13. 13 Any must-have item for travelling?
  14. 14 Ideas for Ladies Beach Destination October
  15. 15 2nd career ideas for travelers
  16. 16 Backpacking in Europe
  17. 17 Travelocity problems
  18. 18 need to Plan summer holidays
  19. 19 When do you start packing your suitcase(s)?
  20. 20 Sharing/organizing group travel photos
  21. 21 Active locals, beaches, jungle, limited industrialism - Can I have it all?
  22. 22 Food Delicacies of spain
  23. 23 Help planning a family trip to the Grand Canyon this summer!
  24. 24 Too old maybe?
  25. 25 July 2016 Honeymoon Destination...Too many options!
View next 25 » Back to the top

Portland, OR to California vs. Vancouver

Jump to last reply

Hello Friends,

This July my 19 yr old daughter and I are planning a trip to Portland, OR (business for me) and afterwards leisure going possibly to Vancouver and definitely California--ending in Los Angeles. We will have about 8 days for traveling. To keep costs down, would it be advisable to skip Vancover and go straight to CA? Would it be better to drive from Portland, OR to California of fly? If so, what are my options as far as driving routes and must see things between OR and CA and places to stay along the way? I'm really not fond of car rides that are longer than 5 or 6 hours. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.

Jerseygurl

  • Report Abuse

    You may want to post this query in another forum - this one doesn't get too much traffic. Try the US and Canada forums and see what your responses are.

    If you're needing to keep costs down, then it would be cheaper to skip Vancouver. Not sure why this would even be a question given the distances involved. ?? I live in Vancouver, it's gorgeous and I love it and I think everyone should visit, but if you have limited time and funds then adding a destination that is in the opposite direction of your "must see" LA doesn't make too much sense.

    As far as driving versus flying, do you want to spend more of your time in LA? Or are you more interested in the journey and the sights along the way?

    Think about it...
    To drive from Portland to Vancouver is about 5-6 hours. So that's pretty much one day eaten up. It'd take at least another 3 days of solid driving to get down to LA from Vancouver (with the 5 or 6 hours a day limit you mention). So, you will have spent at least 4 days of driving (without time to stop and see sights along the way). That leaves you 4 days to spend in Vancouver, LA and maybe San Francisco - only about 1 day in each place. It's crazy!!!

    The Oregon coast is beautiful, as is the Northern California coast.

    If I were you, with that limited time, I would drive from Portland down the freeway to San Francisco (day 1), spend a couple of days there (days 2,3), then head to the coast and drive down to Monterey and Carmel spend a day or two in Carmel (days 4,5) - then continue down the coast through Big Sur and further down to LA (day 6)and spend a couple of days there before departing.

    However, the costs of dropping off a rental car in a different city can be enormous. So you need to research that. I suspect it would be cheaper to fly from Portland to LA... but you'd miss a lot along the way.

1 Reply |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement