Travel Tips & Trip Ideas Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

View all Travel Tips & Trip Ideas activity »
  1. 1 Oregon coast trip destination advise please
  2. 2 A problem with booking.com
  3. 3 First solo trip, where should I visit?
  4. 4 Do you get your expired passport back?
  5. 5 Museum exhibitions
  6. 6 Best way to find new things to do in new city/country?
  7. 7 Best place for a solo traveler to find a travel partner
  8. 8 Best time to purchase ticket on British Air
  9. 9 Wheeled duffle options
  10. 10 Grad trip: African Safari vs. Europe
  11. 11 Fodor's: Please Stop with the Obnoxious Ads
  12. 12 Newbie Using Whats App
  13. 13 TripIt App?
  14. 14 Watch Out! There are VRBO.com Fees!
  15. 15 Money transfer
  16. 16 Itinerary Planning Apps
  17. 17 Why Do People Bother With Tripadvisor?
  18. 18 In search of international vacation ideas with toddler from NYC
  19. 19 Passport signature
  20. 20 Need advice! First time to Ireland, 10 day itinerary set
  21. 21 Switzerland-Paris10 days trip...queries
  22. 22 St. Louis MO to Yellowstone
  23. 23 May or June trip ideas with 2 adult children
  24. 24 Outdoorsy but with shopping
  25. 25 Travel ideas near spring break?
View next 25 » Back to the top

Portland, OR to California vs. Vancouver

Jump to last reply

Hello Friends,

This July my 19 yr old daughter and I are planning a trip to Portland, OR (business for me) and afterwards leisure going possibly to Vancouver and definitely California--ending in Los Angeles. We will have about 8 days for traveling. To keep costs down, would it be advisable to skip Vancover and go straight to CA? Would it be better to drive from Portland, OR to California of fly? If so, what are my options as far as driving routes and must see things between OR and CA and places to stay along the way? I'm really not fond of car rides that are longer than 5 or 6 hours. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.

Jerseygurl

  • Report Abuse

    You may want to post this query in another forum - this one doesn't get too much traffic. Try the US and Canada forums and see what your responses are.

    If you're needing to keep costs down, then it would be cheaper to skip Vancouver. Not sure why this would even be a question given the distances involved. ?? I live in Vancouver, it's gorgeous and I love it and I think everyone should visit, but if you have limited time and funds then adding a destination that is in the opposite direction of your "must see" LA doesn't make too much sense.

    As far as driving versus flying, do you want to spend more of your time in LA? Or are you more interested in the journey and the sights along the way?

    Think about it...
    To drive from Portland to Vancouver is about 5-6 hours. So that's pretty much one day eaten up. It'd take at least another 3 days of solid driving to get down to LA from Vancouver (with the 5 or 6 hours a day limit you mention). So, you will have spent at least 4 days of driving (without time to stop and see sights along the way). That leaves you 4 days to spend in Vancouver, LA and maybe San Francisco - only about 1 day in each place. It's crazy!!!

    The Oregon coast is beautiful, as is the Northern California coast.

    If I were you, with that limited time, I would drive from Portland down the freeway to San Francisco (day 1), spend a couple of days there (days 2,3), then head to the coast and drive down to Monterey and Carmel spend a day or two in Carmel (days 4,5) - then continue down the coast through Big Sur and further down to LA (day 6)and spend a couple of days there before departing.

    However, the costs of dropping off a rental car in a different city can be enormous. So you need to research that. I suspect it would be cheaper to fly from Portland to LA... but you'd miss a lot along the way.

1 Reply |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement