Travel Tips & Trip Ideas Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

  • Announcement:
  • Recent Spam Attacks
    by mkataoka Fodor's Editor | Posted on Nov 28, 16 at 01:31 PM
View all Travel Tips & Trip Ideas activity »
  1. 1 A most peculiar suitcase--it comes with shelves!
  2. 2 Honeymoon on a Budget
  3. 3 TravelAgent
  4. 4 Your Favorite Rain coat?
  5. 5 Paris city to Orly airport transport
  6. 6 Bad Experience
  7. 7 Egypt or Singapore ?
  8. 8 Business trip in early March
  9. 9 Trip Report Mishap and Adventure studying English in Malta
  10. 10 Looking for clothing recommendations!
  11. 11 Family of 3-month long trip
  12. 12 Solo travel France / winter
  13. 13 What can i do to make Turkish airline to refund my unused tickets
  14. 14 Christmas warm weather
  15. 15 B. Hills/Badlands from Denver
  16. 16 Trip Report Goin' solo...nothing like it! (A trip report collection)
  17. 17 SiobhanP Back looking for old Friends!
  18. 18 Detroit to Glacier National Park
  19. 19 Bruges or Copenhagen?!
  20. 20 Europe in December with a toddler - need to make plans ASAP
  21. 21 Want to go Munich
  22. 22 Rockies, Teton, Yellowstone, Glacier Parks
  23. 23 Road trip to Utah from CA
  24. 24 suggestions about noise cancelling earphone
  25. 25 US (Road or Air) Trip Ideas for December
View next 25 » Back to the top

Portland, OR to California vs. Vancouver

Jump to last reply

Hello Friends,

This July my 19 yr old daughter and I are planning a trip to Portland, OR (business for me) and afterwards leisure going possibly to Vancouver and definitely California--ending in Los Angeles. We will have about 8 days for traveling. To keep costs down, would it be advisable to skip Vancover and go straight to CA? Would it be better to drive from Portland, OR to California of fly? If so, what are my options as far as driving routes and must see things between OR and CA and places to stay along the way? I'm really not fond of car rides that are longer than 5 or 6 hours. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.

Jerseygurl

  • Report Abuse

    You may want to post this query in another forum - this one doesn't get too much traffic. Try the US and Canada forums and see what your responses are.

    If you're needing to keep costs down, then it would be cheaper to skip Vancouver. Not sure why this would even be a question given the distances involved. ?? I live in Vancouver, it's gorgeous and I love it and I think everyone should visit, but if you have limited time and funds then adding a destination that is in the opposite direction of your "must see" LA doesn't make too much sense.

    As far as driving versus flying, do you want to spend more of your time in LA? Or are you more interested in the journey and the sights along the way?

    Think about it...
    To drive from Portland to Vancouver is about 5-6 hours. So that's pretty much one day eaten up. It'd take at least another 3 days of solid driving to get down to LA from Vancouver (with the 5 or 6 hours a day limit you mention). So, you will have spent at least 4 days of driving (without time to stop and see sights along the way). That leaves you 4 days to spend in Vancouver, LA and maybe San Francisco - only about 1 day in each place. It's crazy!!!

    The Oregon coast is beautiful, as is the Northern California coast.

    If I were you, with that limited time, I would drive from Portland down the freeway to San Francisco (day 1), spend a couple of days there (days 2,3), then head to the coast and drive down to Monterey and Carmel spend a day or two in Carmel (days 4,5) - then continue down the coast through Big Sur and further down to LA (day 6)and spend a couple of days there before departing.

    However, the costs of dropping off a rental car in a different city can be enormous. So you need to research that. I suspect it would be cheaper to fly from Portland to LA... but you'd miss a lot along the way.

1 Reply |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement