Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > South America
Reload this Page >

Atacama v. El Calafate and Buenos Aires

Search

Atacama v. El Calafate and Buenos Aires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23rd, 2012, 02:30 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Atacama v. El Calafate and Buenos Aires

Considering two different itineraries right now:

1) 1 night Santiago, 4 nights in Torres del Paine then 3 nights in Atacama Desert, and 1 night Santiago; or
2) 1 night Santiago, 4 nights in Torres del Paine then 2 nights El Calafate then 2 nights Buenos Aires.

In your experience, which would you recommend and why? My travel agent recommends the Atacama option, but I am a little daunted by the FULL day of travel from Torres del Paine to Atacama (long drive, two flights, long drive over nearly a full day). I am also concerned about altitude sickness in Atacama.

Any thoughts are appreciated!
MustangSally99 is offline  
Old Aug 23rd, 2012, 11:47 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With 9 nights #2 makes a lot more sense than #1. There are also other options. It depends on the time of year and what you really want to see. But trying to squeeze both Patagonia and Atacama into 9 nights is not a good option.
Huentetu is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2012, 04:31 AM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are going the first two weeks of December. My main interest is Patagonia. But someday I do want to see Atacama and also the Altiplano and Uyuni salt flats. I suppose that could be an entirely different trip. I really want to see the nightsky in Atacama.
MustangSally99 is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2012, 05:08 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With just 9 nights I would always choose the one country over two countries option, i.e. stick to Chile only. Also, 2 nights in BA isn't much to see what that city has to offer.
pgriffin is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2012, 12:06 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You would spend most of a day traveling from Torres del Paine to El Calafate too. I think the bus from Puerto Natalas takes 5 hours, and it's an hour or so to get there from the park. Only two days in El Calafate, all you'd have time to do is see the glacier on the second day, having taken most of the first day to get there.

San Pedro is at 8000 feet, +/-, so most people don't have trouble there. We had two nights there to acclimate before we went up to the high country, 15000+ feet, so that would mean only on the last day could you go to the highest elevations.

I've been to all three places, and each have something to recommend them. The Atacama provides a contrast to Patagonia. From these two trips, I'd probably go for #1.
traveler318 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
filmwill
South America
79
Mar 16th, 2018 06:45 PM
swPA
South America
8
Apr 21st, 2014 12:41 PM
roosevelt
South America
9
Mar 19th, 2014 05:18 PM
arthi9487
South America
5
Nov 23rd, 2009 09:36 AM
MRoadster187
Mexico & Central America
4
Dec 14th, 2007 06:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -