Have you been any of these places before? If not, I think you should drop Switzerland and add a day or two to Paris and a day to Italy. Two days is really not enough time for Switzerland.

I'd look to the Jura alps rather than Switzerland, this area to the north east of Mont Blanc avoids the cost of Switzerland and yet the mountain meadows are wonderful, full of wild flowers, bees etc and yet with great views of the mountains. Start at Bescancon, then follow the Doubs river to Pontarlier and then Les Fourgs, if you then walk to the East you will find yourself on the winter cross country skiing race route and some fo the finest Franche comte country you will find, lots of small hotels, fine food and pleasant people.

For transportation you can easily get from Paris to Zurich or to Geneva or even Lausanne via TGV services within 4-6 hours.

Since you are continuing eventually to Venice and if you still want to see part of Switzerland what you might do is this: take a TGV connection from Paris to Geneva or Lausanne and continue on to somewhere along the north shore of Lac Leman; perhaps Vevey or Montreux. You could even go as far as Brig/Zermatt. The Vevey/Montreux option means you could also take an excusrion up to Rochers de Naye for the fabulous views.

There are EASY connections from these towns by rail through Brig and the Simplon Tunnel into Italy and Milan where you can change for a fast connection onward to Venice.

I'd agree with kybourbon - With a minimum of 5 locations (more if you generalize and list "Switzerland") that's a tremendous amount of travel in just 15 days in Europe. I would also eliminate Switzerland and save it for another trip. When you add in travel time - be it train, plane, etc... your will spend 1/4 of your vacation just getting to different cities. I'd see more and travel from spot-to-spot less...

I agree with eliminating Switzerland. You don't have enough time to do it justice. Add time to Paris. It is definitely worth more than two full days. Do you plan to visit the Tuscan countryside while in Siena? If so, it would best be seen if you rent a car.

I think with one less stop, your trip is a good one. Enjoy!

Thank you ALL for your responses! We have never been to Europe before and want to see as much as possible -- without of course running into train/plane/automobile fatigue

My husband is HOT on seeing Switzerland. I wonder if there is any way to fit just one piece of it in?

You can fit one piece of it in if you take something else out.

As it is you have very minimal time everywhere except Siena. (IMHO a first trip to Paris should be at elast 4 days/5 nights to see much of anything and even begin to get a feel for the city.)

this looks a lot more like a forced March than a romantic trip.

Thanks so much!!

If you really want to see Switzerland, then forget Paris, as you really only have one day there anyway, considering jet lag and arrival logistics on the first day. Why bother? Fly into Switzerland instead and do Paris some other time.

We did a similar trip last summer for our anniversary: Paris, Switzerland (BO area), Venice, and Rome over a period of 3 weeks. With everything to see, 4-5 nights in each location would be a minimum in my book. You could probably get away with 3-4 nights in Venice, though.

We loved each location. I have to say though, we really loved the BO area in Switzerland for its breathtaking beauty. It also gives you a break from the cities you will be visiting. I would save it for another trip if you can't stay longer to appreciate the area.

The itinerary is wonderful - they just need more days to do it. You did it in 3 week s- makes sense - not generous but sense - but not in 14 days on the ground.

If Swizterland is a must, I'd suggest eliminating either Siena or Venice, and adding the time to Paris. Just remember that every time you change locations, you'll lose about half a day to travel, hotel check-in/out, etc.

If you do go to Switzerland, I agree with the suggestion to visit the Berner Oberland. We really enjoyed our time in Wengen, which is high in the mountains. Some people also enjoy this area staying in the valley of Lauterbrunnen,, or at the gateway to the mountains between the lakes in Interlaken. However, keep in mind that Switzerland is a very expensive country so food and lodging will really cost you here. Travel through those mountains can also get very pricey, and be slower than you think, so plan out this portion of your trip carefully before you definitely decide to keep it on the list.

Also, what time of year will you be taking this trip? If in the summer, keep in mind that most places will be very hot (Switzerland should be the one exception), which will slow you down a little. Temps will be similar to those in Baltimore. So think about a tourist who wanted to visit DC, Baltimore, Philly, New York, and the Adirondacks in two+ weeks. It is theoretically doable, but how much will they really enjoy the trip? I think you'll have a better time if you cross at least one place off the list.