Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

London to Paris. Fly or chunnel?

Search

London to Paris. Fly or chunnel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19th, 2005, 09:03 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
London to Paris. Fly or chunnel?

We are a family of five; kids are 16, 14 and 11. We will be in London for 2 weeks in August, but want to take a short (3 night) trip to Paris during that time. Are there advantages, in terms of time and/or money, between taking the chunnel or flying?
peebness is offline  
Old May 19th, 2005, 10:12 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compare all the costs and convenience issues. I suspect flying will be cheapest, but maybe you can find a special deal for the train. The two airlines to consider are BMI and EasyJet. Many here do not like to fly the route, but I found it easy and convenient. Once I arrived at CDG, I took the Air France bus to my hotel.
WillTravel is offline  
Old May 19th, 2005, 11:13 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The main advantage to taking the Eurostar is that it takes you from the centre of London/Paris straight to the other city centre. No airport transfers, no train tickets to purchase. With five of you, it may be less hassle to catch the train. Also, sometimes special discounts are offered on the British Eurostar website that aren't offered on the French one, and vice versa, so check the website as well as the travel agency.
hopeless_nomad is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 05:35 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you might get youth discounts on the train, which you wouldn't get, or not so much at least, on the plane. Also the center to center thing and shorter check-in time for the train is a huge advantage. Third of all: I think this high speed train goin under a chunnel is a quite more unique experience than flying.
stardust is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 05:44 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just got back from a London/Paris jaunt and using the EuroStar train. My son got a great rate as a student on the train, and my rate wasn't bad---because I booked in advance. The train ride was nice---got to see the countryside in England and in France, and I think faster than flying. Also got to do some great people watching on the train. I think your children would love it---they can get some great snacks on the train which is fun for kids.
adamsparks is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 05:50 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would recommend the train...it'll save you time getting to/from the airport, and let you have a new experience of taking the Eurostar through the Chunnel, which is neat. It'll also probably be cheaper, especially if you buy before you go.

My husband and I have used Mele, an agent in Hawaii who will ship your tickets to you and get the best rate. You can buy up to 180 days in advance (it used to be 120 days, but they changed it -- I'm going in September and already have mine).

Check her out at http://www.meleterc.com/

Another upside is your kids will get to see a little bit of the French countryside from the ground.

Good luck!

Jules
jules4je7 is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 07:58 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a standing start in downtown London, there is no question you can be in central Paris faster by train. With the student fares, it's also likely to be cheaper. And, as pointed out above, it's more fun and interesting.

You can check Eurostar fares for various countries by deleting any eurostar.com cookies you've accumulated, and then sign in as if you were from US, UK or France. Check the specials - some of them are remarkably cheap.
Robespierre is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 08:45 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way, my husband and I booked RT tickets (Leisure Fare) 2nd class for $94 each. I'm sure it would be less for kids especially if you book in advance.

In our case, we're not going back to London -- but we booked RT anyway because it was $150 one way -- we just won't get on the return train.

Good luck.

Julie
jules4je7 is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 10:22 AM
  #9  
rex
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, I hate to be the language police on this... but I'm surprised that no one else yet has commented on the <u>distinctly</u> &quot;out-of-fashion&quot; use of the term &quot;chunnel&quot; - - presumbly created by newspaper headline writers to save space.

You don't <i>take</i> &quot;the chunnel&quot;; you take the train called the Eurostar.

And it travels by way of <i>the channel tunnel</i>.

Best wishes,

Rex
rex is offline  
Old May 20th, 2005, 12:16 PM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for your input, practical as well as semantic. It seems to be unanimous that The Eurostar (!) is the way to go.
peebness is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crazy4vacations
Europe
26
Jan 18th, 2015 03:03 PM
swtyboo
Europe
9
Jul 28th, 2010 07:30 AM
upergirl
Europe
9
Jun 21st, 2007 03:27 PM
Danaedward
Europe
11
Apr 23rd, 2003 10:51 AM
europegirl
Europe
11
Feb 4th, 2003 08:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -