King's Cross Locale...
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
NO, NO, a thousand times NO! If you want safe, less expensive lodging look into the Bloomsbury area or South Kennsington. Earl's Court also has many, many hotels, but I would choose that either simply because its hotel city, especially if traveling alone.
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Wow am I ever glad I did't book a hotel in that area, it sounds as though I may have been shocked when I arrived!<BR>Thank you so much for your input - otherwise my London experience may have turned out vastly different!<BR>I was having trouble finding information about the Kings Cross area, so perhaps this is why...
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
I stayed at the London Ryan which is in the Kings Cross area for 6 days. A mixed area of run down buildings, apartments, and middle class housing. I would stay in the area again. <BR><BR>http://www.kingscrosslondon.com/
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
What hookers? Just working class people as far as I could see. Walked from Oxford street to Regents Park back to my hotel on Kings Cross road during the day and took walks around the block(1 to 1 1/2 miles) at night. North of Kings Cross station it was more run down but there was also a lot of rebuilding going on. <BR><BR>I suspect that Peter is a troll.
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
The King?s Cross Ryan and nearby hotels are on a nondescript road, with few restaurants, but perfectly safe. The area of Kings Cross that has the prostitutes and drug dealers is very small, directly on front of Kings Cross station, an area where now there are no hotels. So long as you approach the Ryan and its neighbours by bus, or walking from the south, you don?t notice the unsavoury area just by Kings Cross.<BR><BR>In fact, not that unsavoury. I cycle past it in daylight two or three times a week, and there is nothing to disturb me. Perhaps we cyclists are known for the purity of our interests ?<BR><BR>Ben Haines, London<BR><BR><BR>
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Jewels: Ben often defends Kings Cross on this board -- I think he may do it just so he can show us how brave he is because he cycles in the area a couple of time a week ;-)<BR><BR>But even Ben says "So long as you approach the Ryan and its neighbours by bus, or walking from the south, you don't notice the unsavoury area". In other words - IF you know EXACTLY where to walk or ride you will be OK. Well, for the first time visitor, especially female, that isn't good enough.<BR><BR>It is too easy to get into the wrong parts of Kings Cross. <BR><BR>If Kings Cross was the only part of London with budget accomodations, that might be a consideration. But there are hundreds of places just as inexpensive, in much better areas. There is no reason to have to stay in Kings Cross.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Ben - no offense intended. I was joking, for goodness sake! Didn't you notice the wink??<BR><BR>You provide lots of valuable information - but you must admit, Kings Cross is not a good location for a female (and especially a first-timer) visitor to London.