Europe Forums

Post New Topic

Recent Activity

  • New Fodors vBulletin Forum
  • coming soon -- discuss!
View all Europe activity »
  1. 1 Trip Report Scotland - We're Here!
  2. 2 Train / Calabria
  3. 3 Game of Thrones Tour in N. Ireland
  4. 4 16 days in France and Italy
  5. 5 Sim card/Amsterdam
  6. 6 TIM in FCO - update
  7. 7 Spain itinerary and railway advise
  8. 8 Southern Italy Help - Part 2
  9. 9 Trip Report Short Trip to Usak, (Eastern Aegean Turkey)
  10. 10 Itinery help Crete
  11. 11 Burgundy or Languedoc-Rousillon
  12. 12 Trip Report Lisbon - a few tips
  13. 13 Two days around Oban - help with itinerary
  14. 14 Need help traveling from Austria to Switzerland
  15. 15 Help building itinerary Italy/Austria
  16. 16 Ideas for change in our Italian itinerary please
  17. 17 Avoid Europcar!
  18. 18 Trip Report Trip Report- UK Gardens in May
  19. 19 Train/car from Madrid to Toledo tomorrow
  20. 20 Cinque Terre trip/trains
  21. 21 European Vacation 2017
  22. 22 3 weeks with Kids - Austria Itinerary help
  23. 23 offline navigation for a tablet in Germany and Austria
  24. 24 Need help in completing trip details
  25. 25 Odd Question - freezer and microwave
View next 25 » Back to the top

Italy (Rome/Florence/Venice) vs Spain (Madrid/Seville/Barcelona)

Jump to last reply

Hi everyone,

I am planning to make a first trip to Europe next spring for two weeks. I cannot decide between these two destinations, which one do you think would be more memorable?

Italy: Rome, Florence and Venice.
Spain: Madrid, Seville, Barcelona

I know that both countries are amazing and that I have to make the decision myself, but I am just curious to read your personal taste and travel experiences.

Here are the main points I'm trying to compare for both trips:

1)- Which itinerary is easiest to do by public transportation

2)- Which country is easiest for someone who doesn't speak Italian and Spanish?

3)- Which country based on these three bases would give the opportunity for the easiest, quickest and best day trips.

4)- Is there a big difference between the expenses like hotels, restaurants, etc. (I read that Italy is more expensive, but is it a considerable difference?). I want to stay near the attractions/center of each city and although eating sometimes in restaurants would be great, I want to also buy a little grocery like fruits or bread and cheese, snacks, sandwishes, etc..

5)- Which of this itinerary has the most wow factor? I love to see history, beautiful scenery, piazzas, beautiful historic small streets full of shops, terraces, parks, churches, etc, In other words, I want to experience Europe and its charms and beauty... Are both equally stunning in your opinion, or are there some listed cities that you felt are kinda "meh it's beautiful but not spectacular"

6)- Which cities would be more walkable? Are there cities in the ones listed where each attraction is far from the other and where you have to take the bus or metro to go from each attraction to another? or are all cities walkable with a somewhat compact "old center" and attractions close to each others...

7)- Which country would have less tourists? Sometimes I read that there are huge lines and huge crowds in certain cities around the attractions, is Italy more crowded or are they both equally very crowded.

Which of these 2 itineraries would you personally recommend when you take into account prices, wow factor, things to do, and being easier by public transportation?

5 Replies |Back to top

Sign in to comment.

Advertisement