CAn I leave my running shoes at home?
Aug 15th, 2007, 08:16 AM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CAn I leave my running shoes at home?
We are spending three weeks in Italy: Venice, Florence, Tuscany, Rome and Calabria. I always wear my Birkenstock sandals to walk in (I can go all day in them, no problem) and hate wearing shoes and socks. We are planning a day in Cinque Terra...that is the only place I think I may need running shoes (athletic shoes) for the hiking. I am trying to save space. Can I leave my running shoes at home?
Aug 15th, 2007, 08:45 AM
#3
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you planning to take at least one other pair of shoes, or just the sandals? Personally, I wouldn't travel with only one pair of shoes for a multitude of reasons. But that's just me. If it happens to be raining, I don't want to be walking around in wet sandals.
I hiked the trail in the CT and wore athletic shoes. I wouldn't recommend wearing sandals for that, but that's not to say I didn't see people in flip flops or sandals. I guess it depends if you even are planning on hiking the trail, and if so, what sections.
Enjoy your trip! Don't stress about the little things. Like kenderina said - worst case is that you have to buy pair over there!
I hiked the trail in the CT and wore athletic shoes. I wouldn't recommend wearing sandals for that, but that's not to say I didn't see people in flip flops or sandals. I guess it depends if you even are planning on hiking the trail, and if so, what sections.
Enjoy your trip! Don't stress about the little things. Like kenderina said - worst case is that you have to buy pair over there!
Aug 15th, 2007, 08:55 AM
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the tips. I am planning on bringing more than one pair of shoes, but only sandals...comfortable ones that I can walk on on the cobblestones. Now I can stress about other things, like my luggage, carry on and purse!
Aug 15th, 2007, 08:57 AM
#5
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I hiked in the Cinque Terre a few years ago, a park official checked to make sure I was wearing appropriate footwear before allowing me on the trails. I don't know if that still happens, or whether Birkenstocks would be considered appropriate. . . .
Aug 15th, 2007, 08:59 AM
#6
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Birkenstock sandals have got to be the ugliest sandals there are. In the land of gorgeous and classy shoes like Italy, I would be embarrased to wear Birkenstock for everything, every day, everywhere. I get the comfort thing, so save it. My opinion.
Aug 15th, 2007, 09:19 AM
#8
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A rainy day in Rome or a Tuscan hill town is perfect for atletic/running shoes. I'm not so sure about sandals.
If you've worn them on rainy days without a problem, leave your running shoes at home.
If you've worn them on rainy days without a problem, leave your running shoes at home.
Aug 15th, 2007, 09:25 AM
#9
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha, that's true, Crocs are definitely uglier, but they're plastic, what do you expect.
I really wouldn't take only sandals on a trip, especially not if you plan on doing what you are calling hiking. Birkenstocks are not good for that, and I don't know what kind you have (they do have more than one model), but the usual ones are not good for hiking and not that flexible. Saying you can walk all day on them at home isn't the same thing as heavy-duty walking/hiking in rough terrain on vacation. So, if you have time (not sure when you leave), just try hiking on some moderate terrain with those shoes for several hours and see how you like it.
I really wouldn't take only sandals on a trip, especially not if you plan on doing what you are calling hiking. Birkenstocks are not good for that, and I don't know what kind you have (they do have more than one model), but the usual ones are not good for hiking and not that flexible. Saying you can walk all day on them at home isn't the same thing as heavy-duty walking/hiking in rough terrain on vacation. So, if you have time (not sure when you leave), just try hiking on some moderate terrain with those shoes for several hours and see how you like it.
Aug 15th, 2007, 09:55 AM
#10
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dear cipparone, there are several discussion threads here about shoes...search "comfortable shoes" and you will get many suggestions of great supportive and fashionable shoes to wear:
Keens "Barcelona"/Mary Janes, Mephisto "All Rounders", NAOT, Josef Seibel, Born, Ecco "Receptors", Think sandals, Clarks "Artisan" and "Privo" lines, Dansko has some cute cushioney "Mary Janes" and my all time comfort shoe the Finn Comfort...pricey, but with foot problems and a closet of shoes I cannot wear, I was lucky enough to find FC!! I just ordered the "Jersey" from Zappos.com! It's all about comfort--you are the one who ultimately decides, and I wouldn't worry about what others think!! JMO
Keens "Barcelona"/Mary Janes, Mephisto "All Rounders", NAOT, Josef Seibel, Born, Ecco "Receptors", Think sandals, Clarks "Artisan" and "Privo" lines, Dansko has some cute cushioney "Mary Janes" and my all time comfort shoe the Finn Comfort...pricey, but with foot problems and a closet of shoes I cannot wear, I was lucky enough to find FC!! I just ordered the "Jersey" from Zappos.com! It's all about comfort--you are the one who ultimately decides, and I wouldn't worry about what others think!! JMO
Aug 15th, 2007, 09:56 AM
#11
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<Birkenstock sandals have got to be the ugliest sandals there are. .... My opinion. >
Viajero2 - I understand that is your opinion, and that is fine, but how does that help the OP? Why even post?
Viajero2 - I understand that is your opinion, and that is fine, but how does that help the OP? Why even post?
Aug 15th, 2007, 10:08 AM
#12
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I winced when I read someone's advice to buy hiking shoes in Italy. The thought of hiking the CT trail (especially the Vernazza-Corniglia or Vernazza-Monterrosso legs) with new shoes not yet broken in makes my feet hurt. This is just a word from a woman of a certain age (long past chic) with hard to fit feet.
Aug 15th, 2007, 10:22 AM
#13
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't understand in the OP post it to be serious hiking on a trail. I know the Cinque Terrae area is a hilly one, but I don't think you need real hiking shoes to go on the streets, but maybe you do need athletic shoes 
Aug 15th, 2007, 06:51 PM
#15
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sorry if I gave the impression that one needed hiking boots for the CT trails--just something sturdy with a little support such as running or walkign shoes. It's just that my feet don't take well to even sneakers that are not broken in. Remember, old lady speaking.
Aug 15th, 2007, 07:12 PM
#17
If you're under 30, you can probably do the CT trails in flip-flops. Anything older than 30, and you're going to need your running shoes -- not hiking shoes, just good, supportive, well-made running shoes. I'm sorry, but Birkenstocks ain't gonna cut it on those trails!
